A stepwise approach to the laboratory diagnosis of Buruli ulcer disease.

OBJECTIVE: In view of technical and financial limitations in areas of endemicity, the current practice and recommendations for the laboratory diagnosis of Buruli ulcer disease (BUD) may have to be reconsidered. We reviewed diagnostic results in order to explore options for a modified, more practicable, cost-effective and timely approach to the laboratory diagnosis of BUD. METHODS: Diagnostic specimens from 161 clinically diagnosed BUD patients from four different treatment centres in Ghana were subjected to laboratory analysis. The positivity rates of the laboratory assays were compared. RESULTS: The number of laboratory-confirmed clinically diagnosed BUD cases with one positive confirmative test was 20% higher than that with two positive confirmative tests. The specificity of microscopy (MIC) and PCR was 96.6% and 100%, respectively. Subsequent analysis of specimens from surgically excised pre-ulcerative tissue-by-tissue MIC and tissue PCR rendered 65% laboratory-confirmed BUD cases. Subsequent analysis of diagnostic swabs from ulcerative lesions by swab smear MIC and swab PCR rendered 70% of laboratory-confirmed BUD cases. CONCLUSIONS: The specificity of the diagnostic tests used in this study suggests that one positive diagnostic test may be considered sufficient for the laboratory confirmation of BUD. Subsequent application of different diagnostic tests rendered a laboratory confirmation of 65% pre-ulcerative and of 70% ulcerative lesions. Implementation of a stepwise, subsequent analysis of diagnostic specimens will result in considerable cost saving compared with simultaneous testing of specimens by several diagnostic assays.

Post-surgical assessment of excised tissue from patients with Buruli ulcer disease: progression of infection in macroscopically healthy tissue.

OBJECTIVE: The current standard of treatment of Buruli ulcer disease (BUD) is surgical excision of lesions. Excision size is determined macroscopically assuming the complete removal of all infected tissue. However, dissemination of infection beyond the excision margins into apparently healthy tissue, possibly associated with recurrences, cannot be excluded in this way. To assess the central to peripheral progression of Mycobacterium ulcerans infection and the mycobacterial infiltration of excision margins, excised tissue was examined for signs of infection. METHODS: 20 BUD lesions were excised in general anaesthesia including all necrotic and subcutaneous adipose tissue down to the fascia and at an average of 40 mm into the macroscopically unaffected tissue beyond the border of the lesion. Tissue samples were subjected to PCR and histopathology. RESULTS: Although the bacillary load decreased from central to peripheral, M. ulcerans infection was detected throughout all examined tissue specimens including the peripheral segments as well as excision margins of all patients. During the post-operative hospitalization period (averaging 2 months) no local recurrences were observed. CONCLUSION: Available data suggest a correlation of surgical techniques with local recurrences. The results of this study indicate the unnoticed early progression of mycobacterial infection into macroscopically healthy tissue. Thus, the removal of all infected tissue cannot always be verified visually by the surgeon. Provided that long-term follow up of patients with positive excision margins will establish the clinical relevance of these findings, on-site laboratory assessment of excised tissue in combination with follow up may contribute to reduce recurrence rates.