Harnessing new mHealth technologies to Strengthen the Management of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Vietnam (V-SMART trial): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) remains a major public health problem globally. Long, complex treatment regimens coupled with frequent adverse events have resulted in poor treatment adherence and patient outcomes. Smartphone-based mobile health (mHealth) technologies offer national TB programmes an appealing platform to improve patient care and management; however, clinical trial evidence to support their use is lacking. This trial will test the hypothesis that an mHealth intervention can improve treatment success among patients with MDR-TB and is cost-effective compared with standard practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A community-based, open-label, parallel-group randomised controlled trial will be conducted among patients treated for MDR-TB in seven provinces of Vietnam. Patients commencing therapy for microbiologically confirmed rifampicin-resistant or multidrug-resistant tuberculosis within the past 30 days will be recruited to the study. Participants will be individually randomised to an intervention arm, comprising use of an mHealth application for treatment support, or a 'standard care' arm. In both arms, patients will be managed by the national TB programme according to current national treatment guidelines. The primary outcome measure of effectiveness will be the proportion of patients with treatment success (defined as treatment completion and/or bacteriological cure) after 24 months. A marginal Poisson regression model estimated via a generalised estimating equation will be used to test the effect of the intervention on treatment success. A prospective microcosting of the intervention and within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis will also be undertaken from a societal perspective. Cost-effectiveness will be presented as an incremental cost per patient successfully treated and an incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained. ETHICS: Ethical approval for the study was granted by The University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (2019/676). DISSEMINATION: Study findings will be disseminated to participants and published in peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12620000681954.

Immunological Assessment of Lung Responses to Inhalational Lipoprotein Vaccines Against Bacterial Pathogens.

Lipopeptides or lipoproteins show potential as safe and effective subunit vaccines for protection against bacterial pathogens. Provided suitable adjuvants are selected, such as the TLR2-stimulating molecules Pam2Cys and Pam3Cys, these may be formulated as inhalational vaccines to optimize localized pulmonary immune responses. Here, we present methods to assess antigen-specific memory lymphocyte responses to novel vaccines, with a focus on immune responses in the lung tissue and bronchoalveolar space. We describe detection of T-cell responses via leukocyte restimulation, followed by intracellular cytokine staining and flow cytometry, enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay (ELISpot), and sustained leukocyte restimulation for detection of antigen-specific memory responses. We also detail assessment of antibody responses to vaccine antigens, via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based detection. These methods are suitable for testing a wide range of pulmonary vaccines.

Management of Australian Adults with Bronchiectasis in Tertiary Care: Evidence-Based or Access-Driven?

PURPOSE: Australian data regarding the management of patients with bronchiectasis is scarce. We sought to compare the management of adults with bronchiectasis attending tertiary Australian centres with recent national and international guidelines. METHODS: The Australian Bronchiectasis Registry is a centralised database of patients with radiologically confirmed bronchiectasis unrelated to cystic fibrosis recruited from 14 tertiary Australian hospitals. We excluded children (<18 years) and those with incomplete data, leaving 589 adults for cross-sectional analyses. We compared the proportion of patients receiving certain therapies, as compared to the proportion eligible for those treatments according to the current guidelines and baseline clinical information available from the registry. RESULTS: Pulmonary rehabilitation was attended by 22%, although it was indicated in 67% of the cohort. Airway clearance was undertaken in 52% of patients, although 71% reported chronic productive cough. Sputum bacterial culture results were available for 59%, and mycobacterial culture results were available for 29% of the cohort. Inhaled antibiotics were used in half of potentially eligible patients. Despite guideline recommendations against routine use, inhaled corticosteroids were used in 48% of patients. Long-term macrolides were used in 28% of participants. CONCLUSIONS: Discrepancies exist between guideline recommendations and real-world treatment of bronchiectasis in Australia, even in tertiary centres. These findings suggest the need for increased patient referral to pulmonary rehabilitation, increased attention to airway clearance, increased collection of sputum samples (especially for mycobacterial culture) and rationalisation of inhaled corticosteroid use. These findings encourage a review of treatment access and will inform ongoing education to promote evidence-based care for people living with bronchiectasis.

Household contact investigation for the detection of tuberculosis in Vietnam: economic evaluation of a cluster-randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Active case finding is recommended as an important strategy to control tuberculosis, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries with a high prevalence of the disease. However, the costs and cost-effectiveness of active case finding are unclear due to the absence of evidence from randomised trials. We assessed the costs and cost-effectiveness of an active case finding strategy in Vietnam, where there is a high prevalence of tuberculosis. METHODS: We conducted an economic evaluation alongside the Active Case Finding in Tuberculosis (ACT2) trial-a pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial in 70 districts across eight provinces of Vietnam. Patients aged 15 years and older with smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis were recruited to the trial if they lived with one or more other household members. Household contacts were verbally invited to the clinic by the index patient with tuberculosis. ACT2 compared a combination of active and passive case finding with usual care (passive case finding) of household contacts of patients with tuberculosis from a health system perspective. Clustering occurred at the district and household level. Districts were the unit of randomisation, and we used minimisation to ensure balance of intervention and control districts within each province. In the intervention group, participants were invited to attend screening at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months. We determined health-care costs with a standardised national costing survey and reported results in 2017 $US. The primary outcome of our study was disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted over a 24-month period. ACT2 was registered prospectively with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN126.100.00600044. FINDINGS: Between Aug 11, 2010, and Aug 11, 2015, 10 964 index patients and 25 707 household contacts completed the ACT2 study. There were 10 069 household contacts in the intervention group and 15 638 household contacts in the control group. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per DALY averted was $544 (330-1375). INTERPRETATION: Active case finding was shown to be highly cost-effective in a setting with a high prevalence of tuberculosis. Investment in the wide-scale implementation of this programme in Vietnam should be strongly supported. FUNDING: Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

The Delivery of High-Dose Dry Powder Antibiotics by a Low-Cost Generic Inhaler.

The routine of loading multiple capsules for delivery of high-dose antibiotics is time consuming, which may reduce patient adherence to inhaled treatment. To overcome this limitation, an investigation was carried out using four modified versions of the Aerolizer® that accommodate a size 0 capsule for delivery of high payload formulations. In some prototypes, four piercing pins of 0.6 mm each were replaced with a single centrally located 1.2-mm pin and one-third reduced air inlet of the original design. The performance of these inhalers was evaluated using spray-dried antibiotic powders with distinct morphologies: spherical particles with a highly corrugated surface (colistin and tobramycin) and needle-like particles (rifapentine). The inhalers were tested at capsule loadings of 50 mg (colistin), 30 mg (rifapentine) and 100 mg (tobramycin) using a multistage liquid impinger (MSLI) operating at 60 L/min. The device with a single pin and reduced air inlet showed a superior performance than the other prototypes in dispersing colistin and rifapentine powders, with a fine particle fraction (FPF wt% <5 µm in the aerosol) between 62 and 68%. Subsequently, an Aerolizer® with the same configuration (single pin and one-third air inlet) that accommodates a size 00 capsule was designed to increase the payload of colistin and rifapentine. The performance of the device at various inspiratory flow rates and air volumes achievable by most cystic fibrosis (CF) patients was examined at the maximum capsule loading of 100 mg. The device showed optimal performance at 45 L/min with an air volume of 1.5-2.0 L for colistin and 60 L/min with an air volume of 2.0 L for rifapentine. In conclusion, the modified size 00 Aerolizer® inhaler as a low-cost generic device demonstrated promising results for delivery of various high-dose formulations for treatment of lung infections.

Household contact investigation for tuberculosis in Vietnam: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis is an infectious disease that continues to cause considerable morbidity and mortality globally. Only 65% of patients worldwide are currently diagnosed. Contact investigation is a strategy that aims to increase case detection and reduce transmission of tuberculosis, yet there is little evidence to show its effectiveness. METHODS/DESIGN: We will conduct a cluster randomized controlled trial of contact investigation within the national tuberculosis control program of Vietnam. Household contacts of patients with smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis will be invited to attend district tuberculosis units for symptom screening, examination, and chest radiography on four occasions over a two-year period. The primary endpoint is clinically confirmed tuberculosis among contacts during the 24 months of follow-up, ascertained using capture-recapture analysis. Microbiologically proven tuberculosis and treatment completion rates among contacts diagnosed with tuberculosis will be secondary endpoints. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will be estimated. The study will have 80% power to detect a 50% increase in the primary endpoint in the active intervention arm compared with the control arm. The study will include 8,829 contacts in each of the active screening and control groups, within 70 districts in 8 provinces in Vietnam, in both rural and urban settings. DISCUSSION: The effectiveness of contact investigation as a tool for improved tuberculosis case finding has not been established. This cluster randomized trial will provide valuable operational information for national tuberculosis programs in high-prevalence countries, in order to select the most cost-effective strategies to improve tuberculosis case detection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The ACT2 study has been registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12610000600044).