The burden of illness of rheumatoid arthritis in Latin America-A systematic literature review.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease which, when left untreated, may result in the destruction of multiple joints and damage a wide variety of body systems, including the skin, eyes, lungs, heart, and blood vessels. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of disease burden for RA in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, and Venezuela. PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for publications in English, Spanish, or Portuguese from 2008 through June 2018. A total of 1700 records were retrieved and 36 articles were included. The estimated prevalence of RA for these countries ranged from 0.15% (Colombia) to 2.8% (Mexico). The Global Burden of Disease initiative 2019 estimated that RA accounted for 0.13% of world disability-adjusted life-years. For Latin America, these figures were higher: Argentina 0.16%, Brazil 0.16%, Colombia 0.21%, Mexico 0.30%, and Venezuela 0.24%. RA has a negative impact on physical, mental, and emotional well-being as shown by substantially lower scores on measures of quality of life (SF-36) compared with the general population. The annual direct cost in Mexico was estimated at US$3599 per person. For patients with severe RA in Brazil these costs were approximately US$10 000. Data from other studied countries were similar. Though evidence of the full cost and impact of RA in Latin American countries is scarce and additional studies are needed, the burden of RA in these regions is significant and comparable to other parts the world.

Burden of Disease for Psoriasis in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico.

OBJECTIVES: Psoriasis (PsO) is a chronic, inflammatory, multisystem disease with predominantly skin and joint manifestations. The disease is also associated with lower quality of life, lower work productivity, and higher healthcare costs. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review of the disease burden for PsO in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico. METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, SciELO, and LILACS were searched for publications in English, Spanish, or Portuguese from 2003 to July 2018. RESULTS: A total of 680 records were retrieved and 13 articles were included. In Latin America, PsO has a negative impact on the physical and mental well-being as shown by substantially lower scores on measures of quality of life (eg, 12-item Short-Form Health Survey) for patients than the general population. Patients with PsO reported higher levels of presenteeism, activity impairment, and work productivity loss. The estimated annual costs per patient with PsO in Colombia were $3497.58 and $2160.92 for the private sector and public scenario, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although evidence on the full cost and impact of PsO in Latin America is scarce and further research is needed, the burden in these regions is significant and comparable with that in other parts of the world.

Costs and resource use of community-dwelling patients with Alzheimer's disease in Japan: 18-month results from the GERAS-J study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the longitudinal societal costs and burden of community-dwelling patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and their caregivers in Japan. METHODS: GERAS-J was an 18-month, prospective, longitudinal, observational study. Using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), patients routinely visiting memory clinics were stratified into groups based on AD severity at baseline (mild, moderate, and moderately severe/severe [MS/S]). Healthcare resource utilization and caregiver burden were assessed using the Resource Utilization in Dementia and Zarit "Caregiver" Burden Interview questionnaires, respectively. Total monthly societal costs were estimated using Japan-specific unit costs of services and products (patient direct healthcare use, patient social care use, and informal caregiving time). RESULTS: Overall, 553 patients (156 mild; 209 moderate; 188 MS/S) were enrolled. MMSE scores declined (1.73, 1.38, and 0.95 points for the mild, moderate, and MS/S AD groups, respectively) and caregiver burden and resource utilization increased over 18 months in each of the AD severity groups. Cumulative total societal costs per patient over 18 months were 3.1, 3.8, and 5.3 million Japanese yen (29,006, 35,662, and 49,725 USD) for mild, moderate, and MS/S AD, respectively. Both patient social care costs and caregiver informal care costs increased with baseline disease severity, with >50% of total costs due to caregiver informal care in each disease severity subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Total treatment costs increased with AD severity over 18 months due to increases in both patient social care costs and caregiver informal care costs. Our data suggest current social care services in Japan are insufficient to alleviate the negative impact of AD on caregiver burden.

Cost per cumulative clinical benefit of biologic therapies for patients with plaque psoriasis: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Measuring cumulative clinical treatment benefit over time captures speed and magnitude of effects. Assessing the cost of biologics relative to their cumulative clinical benefits versus a single time point represents an alternative to evaluate the value of a given biologic used to treat psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To compare cumulative benefit and cost per cumulative benefit of biologics in treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis from a network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS: Biologics included in the analysis were ixekizumab, adalimumab, guselkumab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, risankizumab, and certolizumab pegol. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) responses over the initial 16-week treatment period were obtained from 31 articles. Cumulative benefits for PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 responses were measured as area under the curve (AUC) using the trapezoidal method. Bayesian-based NMA modeled percent maximum AUC through week 16 (%Max_AUCW16). The AUC estimates over 16 weeks were converted to total skin clearance threshold days achieved for PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 with each biologic. Cost per cumulative benefit was estimated by multiplying number of doses (per FDA label) by nationally representative discounted wholesale acquisition costs (WACs) for 16 weeks of treatment divided by %Max_AUCW16. The primary cost analysis used WACs, including week 16 doses. Co-primary cost analysis used discounted WACs, including week 16 doses. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using WACs and discounted WACs, excluding doses administered at week 16. RESULTS: Among biologics with available week 16 AUC data for PASI 90 and PASI 100, cumulative benefits over the initial 16-week treatment period ranged from 20.2% (certolizumab pegol) to 47.0% (ixekizumab) for PASI 90 and from 7.4% (adalimumab) to 22.2% (ixekizumab) for PASI 100. The total number of estimated PASI 90 and PASI 100 days achieved over the first 16 weeks of treatment was highest with ixekizumab (53 days and 25 days, respectively). In the primary analysis, guselkumab had the lowest cost per cumulative benefit (95% credible interval [CrI]; $99,742 [$89,941-$111,653]), followed by ixekizumab ($108,906 [$95,928-$126,093]) and adalimumab ($111,233 [$97,549-$129,022]) for PASI 90, and ixekizumab had the lowest cost per cumulative benefit ($230,884 [$191,611-$291,115]), followed by secukinumab ($238,945 [$204,029-$288,072]) and risankizumab ($279,968 [$250,683-$316,872]) for PASI 100 responses. In the co-primary analysis, ixekizumab had the lowest discounted cost per AUC (95% CrI; $60,988 [$53,719-$70,612]), followed by guselkumab ($66,827 [$60,260-$74,807]) and secukinumab ($69,622 [$61,783-$79,786]) for PASI 90, and ixekizumab had the lowest cost per cumulative benefit ($129,295 [$107,302-$163,024]), followed by secukinumab ($148,146 [$126,498-$178,605]) and guselkumab ($188,190 [$166,791-$215,969]) for PASI 100 responses. Conclusions: Among biologics studied, ixekizumab demonstrated the greatest cumulative clinical benefit, maintaining the lowest cost per cumulative benefit for PASI 100 responses and lowest discounted cost per cumulative benefit for PASI 90 and PASI 100 responses for moderate to severe psoriasis over the initial 16-week treatment period. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company (Indianapolis, IN). Blauvelt has served as a scientific adviser and/or clinical study investigator for AbbVie, Aclaris, Almirall, Arena, Athenex, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Dermavant, Dermira, Eli Lilly and Company, Forte, Galderma, Incyte, Janssen, Leo, Novartis, Ortho, Pfizer, Rapt, Regeneron, Sandoz, Sanofi Genzyme, Sun Pharma, and UCB Pharma and as a paid speaker for AbbVie. Burge, Zhu, Malatestinic, Brnabic, Guo, and Janardhanan are employees and shareholder of Eli Lilly and Company.

Reweighting Randomized Controlled Trial Evidence to Better Reflect Real Life - A Case Study of the Innovative Medicines Initiative.

Evidence from randomized controlled trials available for timely health technology assessments of new pharmacological treatments and regulatory decision making may not be generalizable to local patient populations, often resulting in decisions being made under uncertainty. In recent years, several reweighting approaches have been explored to address this important question of generalizability to a target population. We present a case study of the Innovative Medicines Initiative to illustrate the inverse propensity score reweighting methodology, which may allow us to estimate the expected treatment benefit if a clinical trial had been run in a broader real-world target population. We learned that identifying treatment effect modifiers, understanding and managing differences between patient characteristic data sets, and balancing the closeness of trial and target patient populations with effective sample size are key to successfully using this methodology and potentially mitigating some of this uncertainty around local decision making.

Combination of several matching adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) with an application in psoriasis.

In health technology assessment (HTA), beside network meta-analysis (NMA), indirect comparisons (IC) have become an important tool used to provide evidence between two treatments when no head-to-head data are available. Researchers may use the adjusted indirect comparison based on the Bucher method (AIC) or the matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC). While the Bucher method may provide biased results when included trials differ in baseline characteristics that influence the treatment outcome (treatment effect modifier), this issue may be addressed by applying the MAIC method if individual patient data (IPD) for at least one part of the AIC is available. Here, IPD is reweighted to match baseline characteristics and/or treatment effect modifiers of published data. However, the MAIC method does not provide a solution for situations when several common comparators are available. In these situations, assuming that the indirect comparison via the different common comparators is homogeneous, we propose merging these results by using meta-analysis methodology to provide a single, potentially more precise, treatment effect estimate. This paper introduces the method to combine several MAIC networks using classic meta-analysis techniques, it discusses the advantages and limitations of this approach, as well as demonstrates a practical application to combine several (M)AIC networks using data from Phase III psoriasis randomized control trials (RCT).

Costs and Resource Use Associated with Community-Dwelling Patients with Alzheimer's Disease in Japan: Baseline Results from the Prospective Observational GERAS-J Study.

BACKGROUND: As the Japanese population ages, caring for people with Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia is becoming a major socioeconomic issue. OBJECTIVE: To determine the contribution of patient and caregiver costs to total societal costs associated with AD dementia. METHODS: Baseline data was used from the longitudinal, observational GERAS-J study. Using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score, patients routinely visiting memory clinics were stratified into three groups based on AD severity. Health care resource utilizationwas recorded using the Resource Utilization in Dementia questionnaire. Total monthly societal costs were estimated using Japan-specific unit costs of services and products (patient direct health care use, patient social care use, and informal caregiving time). Uncertainty around mean costs was estimated using bootstrapping methods. RESULTS: Overall, 553 community-dwelling patients withADdementia (28.3% mild[MMSE21-26], 37.8% moderate[MMSE 15-20], and 34.0% moderately severe/severe [MMSE < 14]) and their caregivers were enrolled. Patient characteristics were: mean age 80.3 years, 72.7% female, and 13.6% living alone. Caregiver characteristics were: mean age 62.1 years, 70.7% female, 78.8% living with patient, 49.0% child of patient, and 39.2% sole caregiver. Total monthly societal costs of AD dementia (Japanese yen) were: 158,454 (mild), 211,301 (moderate), and 294,224 (moderately severe/severe). Informal caregiving costs comprised over 50% of total costs. CONCLUSION: Baseline results of GERAS-J showed that total monthly societal costs associated with AD dementia increased with AD severity. Caregiver-related costs were the largest cost component. Interventions are needed to decrease informal costs and decrease caregiver burden.

Alternative Weighting Approaches for Anchored Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons via a Common Comparator.

BACKGROUND: Adjusted indirect comparisons (anchored via a common comparator) are an integral part of health technology assessment. These methods are challenged when differences between studies exist, including inclusion/exclusion criteria, outcome definitions, patient characteristics, as well as ensuring the choice of a common comparator. OBJECTIVES: Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) can address these challenges, but the appropriate application of MAICs is uncertain. Examples include whether to match between individual-level data and aggregate-level data studies separately for treatment arms or to combine the arms, which matching algorithm should be used, and whether to include the control treatment outcome and/or covariates present in individual-level data. RESULTS: Results from seven matching approaches applied to a continuous outcome in six simulated scenarios demonstrated that when no effect modifiers were present, the matching methods were equivalent to the unmatched Bucher approach. When effect modifiers were present, matching methods (regardless of approach) outperformed the Bucher method. Matching on arms separately produced more precise estimates compared with matching on total moments, and for certain scenarios, matching including the control treatment outcome did not produce the expected effect size. The entropy balancing approach was used to determine whether there were any notable advantages over the method proposed by Signorovitch et al. When unmeasured effect modifiers were present, no approach was able to estimate the true treatment effect. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the Bucher approach (no matching), the MAICs examined demonstrated more accurate estimates, but further research is required to understand these methods across an array of situations.

Quality of Life and Economic Burden of Respiratory Disease in Asia-Pacific-Asia-Pacific Burden of Respiratory Diseases Study.

OBJECTIVES: Asia-Pacific Burden of Respiratory Diseases is a cross-sectional, observational study examining the burden of disease in adults with respiratory diseases across six countries. The aim of this study was to describe health care resource use (HCRU), work impairment, cost burden, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) associated with respiratory disease in the Asia-Pacific. METHODS: Consecutive participants aged 18 years or older with a primary diagnosis of asthma, allergic rhinitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or rhinosinusitis were enrolled. Participants completed a survey detailing respiratory symptoms, HCRU, work productivity and activity impairment, and HRQOL. Locally sourced unit costs for each country were used in the calculation of total costs. RESULTS: The study enrolled 5250 patients. Overall, the mean annual cost for patients with a respiratory disease was US $4191 (SGD 8489) per patient. For patients who reported impairment at work, the mean annual cost was US $7315 (SGD 10,244), with productivity loss being the highest cost component for all four diseases (US $6310 [SGD 9100]). On average, patients were impaired for one-third of their time at work and 5% of their work time missed because of respiratory disease, which resulted in a 36% reduction in productivity. Patients with a primary diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease had the greatest impact on HRQOL. CONCLUSIONS: In the Asia-Pacific, respiratory diseases have a significant impact on HCRU and associated costs, along with work productivity. Timely and effective management of these diseases has the potential to reduce disease burden and health care costs and improve work productivity and HRQOL.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy and automated insulin suspension versus standard pump therapy for hypoglycemic unaware patients with type 1 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy with "Low Glucose Suspend" (LGS) functionality versus standard pump therapy with self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 1 diabetes who have impaired awareness of hypoglycemia. METHODS: A clinical trial-based economic evaluation was performed in which the net costs and effectiveness of the two treatment modalities were calculated and expressed as an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The clinical outcome of interest for the evaluation was the rate of severe hypoglycemia in each arm of the LGS study. Quality-of-life utility scores were calculated using the three-level EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire. Resource use costs were estimated using public sources. RESULTS: After 6 months, the use of sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy with LGS significantly reduced the incidence of severe hypoglycemia compared with standard pump therapy (incident rate difference 1.85 [0.17-3.53]; P = 0.037). Based on a primary randomized study, the ICER per severe hypoglycemic event avoided was $18,257 for all patients and $14,944 for those aged 12 years and older. Including all major medical resource costs (e.g., hospital admissions), the ICERs were $17,602 and $14,289, respectively. Over the 6-month period, the cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained was $40,803 for patients aged 12 years and older. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the Australian experience evaluating new interventions across a broad range of therapeutic areas, sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy with LGS may be considered a cost-effective alternative to standard pump therapy with self-monitoring of blood glucose in hypoglycemia unaware patients with type 1 diabetes.