Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 11006, 2024 05 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38744944

RESUMO

With cancer immunotherapy and precision medicine dynamically evolving, there is greater need for pre-clinical models that can better replicate the intact tumor and its complex tumor microenvironment (TME). Precision-cut tumor slices (PCTS) have recently emerged as an ex vivo human tumor model, offering the opportunity to study individual patient responses to targeted therapies, including immunotherapies. However, little is known about the physiologic status of PCTS and how culture conditions alter gene expression. In this study, we generated PCTS from head and neck cancers (HNC) and mesothelioma tumors (Meso) and undertook transcriptomic analyses to understand the changes that occur in the timeframe between PCTS generation and up to 72 h (hrs) in culture. Our findings showed major changes occurring during the first 24 h culture period of PCTS, involving genes related to wound healing, extracellular matrix, hypoxia, and IFNγ-dependent pathways in both tumor types, as well as tumor-specific changes. Collectively, our data provides an insight into PCTS physiology, which should be taken into consideration when designing PCTS studies, especially in the context of immunology and immunotherapy.


Assuntos
Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Microambiente Tumoral , Humanos , Microambiente Tumoral/genética , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/genética , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/terapia , Transcriptoma , Medicina de Precisão/métodos , Imunoterapia/métodos
2.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 149(10): 904-911, 2023 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37651133

RESUMO

Importance: A core component of delivering care of head and neck diseases is an adequate workforce. The World Health Organization report, Multi-Country Assessment of National Capacity to Provide Hearing Care, captured primary workforce estimates from 68 member states in 2012, noting that response rates were a limitation and that updated more comprehensive data are needed. Objective: To establish comprehensive workforce metrics for global otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS) with updated data from more countries/territories. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional electronic survey characterizing the OHNS workforce was disseminated from February 10 to June 22, 2022, to professional society leaders, medical licensing boards, public health officials, and practicing OHNS clinicians. Main Outcome: The OHNS workforce per capita, stratified by income and region. Results: Responses were collected from 121 of 195 countries/territories (62%). Survey responses specifically reported on OHNS workforce from 114 countries/territories representing 84% of the world's population. The global OHNS clinician density was 2.19 (range, 0-61.7) OHNS clinicians per 100 000 population. The OHNS clinician density varied by World Bank income group with higher-income countries associated with a higher density of clinicians. Regionally, Europe had the highest clinician density (5.70 clinicians per 100 000 population) whereas Africa (0.18 clinicians per 100 000 population) and Southeast Asia (1.12 clinicians per 100 000 population) had the lowest. The OHNS clinicians deliver most of the surgical management of ear diseases and hearing care, rhinologic and sinus diseases, laryngeal disorders, and upper aerodigestive mucosal cancer globally. Conclusion and Relevance: This cross-sectional survey study provides a comprehensive assessment of the global OHNS workforce. These results can guide focused investment in training and policy development to address disparities in the availability of OHNS clinicians.


Assuntos
Otolaringologia , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Recursos Humanos , Otolaringologia/educação , Inquéritos e Questionários , Cabeça , Saúde Global
3.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 166(6): 1062-1069, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34253112

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of sociodemographic factors on primary treatment choice (surgery vs radiotherapy) in patients with human papillomavirus-associated (HPV+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database. SETTING: Data from >1500 Commission on Cancer institutions (academic and community) via the National Cancer Database. METHODS: Our sample consists of patients diagnosed with HPV+ OPSCC from 2010 to 2015. The primary outcome of interest was initial treatment modality: surgery vs radiation. We performed multivariable logistic models to assess the relationship between treatment choice and sociodemographic factors, including sex, race, treatment facility, and insurance status. RESULTS: Of the 16,043 patients identified, 5894 (36.7%) underwent primary surgery while 10,149 (63.3%) received primary radiotherapy. Black patients were less likely than White patients to receive primary surgery (odds ratio [OR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.66-0.96). When compared with privately insured patients, those who were uninsured or on Medicaid or Medicare were also less likely to receive primary surgery (OR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.56-0.86]; OR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.65-0.91]; OR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.75-0.96], respectively). Patients receiving treatment at an academic/research cancer program were more likely to undergo primary surgery than those treated at comprehensive community cancer programs (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.14-1.56). CONCLUSION: In this large sample of patients with HPV+ OPSCC, race and insurance status affect primary treatment choice. Specifically, Black and nonprivately insured patients are less likely to receive primary surgery as compared with White or privately insured patients. Our findings illuminate potential disparities in HPV+ OPSCC treatment.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Idoso , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro , Medicare , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/patologia , Papillomaviridae , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Infecções por Papillomavirus/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço , Estados Unidos
4.
Head Neck ; 42(7): 1448-1453, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32357380

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has raised controversies regarding safe and effective care of patients with head and neck cancer. It is unknown how much the pandemic has changed surgeon practice. METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed to head and neck surgeons assessing opinions related to treatment and concerns for the safety of patients, self, family, and staff. RESULTS: A total of 88 head and neck surgeons responded during the study period. Surgeons continued to recommend primary surgical treatment for oral cavity cancers. Respondents were more likely to consider nonsurgical therapy for patients with early glottic cancers and HPV-mediated oropharynx cancer. Surgeons were least likely to be concerned for their own health and safety and had the greatest concern for their resident trainees. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights differences in the willingness of head and neck surgeons to delay surgery or alter plans during times when hospital resources are scarce and risk is high.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/cirurgia , Pandemias/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Oncologia Cirúrgica/organização & administração , Inquéritos e Questionários , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/epidemiologia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Masculino , Saúde Ocupacional , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Segurança do Paciente , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Gestão de Riscos , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
5.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 144(9): 769-775, 2018 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30054621

RESUMO

Importance: The chimeric anterolateral thigh osteomyocutaneous (ALTO) free flap is a recently described microvascular option for head and neck osseous defects associated with complex soft-tissue requirements. To date, the association of ALTO flap harvest with femur structural integrity and the need for routine prophylactic fixation following harvest has been incompletely described. Objective: To investigate the association of ALTO flap harvest, with and without prophylactic fixation, on femur structural integrity as measured by 4-point bend and torsional biomechanical testing. Design and Setting: At a research laboratory, 24 synthetic fourth-generation composite femurs with validated biomechanical properties underwent 10-cm-long, 30% circumferential osteotomies at the proximal middle third of the femur; 6 femurs served as controls. Osteotomized femurs with and without fixation underwent torsional and 4-point bend biomechanical testing. Femur fixation consisted of intramedullary nail and distal interlock screw placement. Main Outcomes and Measures: Force and torque to fracture (expressed in kilonewtons [kN] and Newton meters [N∙m], respectively) were compared between controls, osteotomized femurs without fixation, and osteotomized femurs with fixation. Additional outcome measures included femur stiffness and fracture patterns. Results: On posterior to anterior (PA) 4-point bend testing, force to fracture of osteotomized femurs was 22% of controls (mean difference, 8.3 kN; 95% CI, 6.6-10.0 kN). On torsional testing the torque to fracture of osteotomized femurs was 12% of controls (mean difference, 351.1 N∙m; 95% CI, 307.1-395.1 N∙m). Following fixation there was a 67% improvement in PA force to fracture and a 37% improvement in torque to fracture. However, osteotomized femurs with fixation continued to have a reduced PA force to fracture at 37% of controls (mean difference, 6.8 kN; 95% CI, 4.5-9.2 kN) and torque to fracture at 16% of controls (mean difference, 333.7 N∙m; 95% CI, 306.8-360.6 N∙m). On torsional testing, all osteotomized femurs developed similar spiral fractures through a corner of the distal osteotomy site. This fracture pattern changed after prophylactic fixation with femurs developing nondisplaced fractures through the proximal osteotomy site. There were no underlying hardware failures during testing of osteotomized femurs with fixation. Conclusions and Relevance: Anterolateral thigh osteomyocutaneous flap harvest results in significant changes in the structural integrity of the femur. Postoperative stabilization should be strongly considered, with future research directed at investigating the clinical significance of residual biomechanical changes following femur fixation.


Assuntos
Transplante Ósseo/métodos , Fêmur/cirurgia , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/métodos , Retalhos de Tecido Biológico/transplante , Retalho Miocutâneo/transplante , Osteotomia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Pinos Ortopédicos , Parafusos Ósseos , Fraturas do Fêmur/etiologia , Fraturas do Fêmur/prevenção & controle , Fêmur/patologia , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/instrumentação , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Anatômicos , Osteotomia/efeitos adversos , Osteotomia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Coxa da Perna
6.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol ; 33(2): 59-65, 2018 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29068794

RESUMO

This multicenter, observational drug utilization (DU) study (NCT01594996) investigated the profile of patients and specialist providers who prescribed extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) for treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) across five European countries (Germany, Italy, Romania, Spain, and Sweden). A DU data abstraction form captured information on the characteristics of physicians, patients, and drugs utilized in the medical management of depressive episodes in MDD, where the therapeutic regimen included quetiapine XR. Data were reported descriptively. This analysis included 811 patients. Psychiatric histories indicated a burden of severe MDD in these patients. Patient demographics were similar across countries; however, those in Sweden had a younger mean age. Physicians' ratings of the therapeutic effect of prior treatment with antidepressants suggested the need for an add-on treatment for most patients. Overall, 15.7% of patients initiated quetiapine XR treatment as monotherapy. Presence of psychotic symptoms during depressive episodes predicted treatment with higher than recommended doses of quetiapine XR (odds ratio=3.11; 95% confidence interval: 1.6-6.0). This analysis demonstrated similarities in DU across the countries analyzed, largely in accordance with the recommended dose of quetiapine XR as an adjunctive therapy to antidepressants in MDD (50-300 mg/day).


Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos , Transtornos Psicóticos/tratamento farmacológico , Fumarato de Quetiapina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Preparações de Ação Retardada/uso terapêutico , Demografia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/psicologia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Transtornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico
7.
PLoS One ; 12(12): e0186739, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29244811

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: During the 2013-2014 influenza season, Public Health England extended routine influenza vaccination to all 2- and 3-year-old children in England. To estimate the impact of this change in policy on influenza-related morbidity and mortality, we developed a disease transmission and surveillance model informed by real-world data. METHODS: We combined real-world and literature data sources to construct a model of influenza transmission and surveillance in England. Data were obtained for four influenza seasons, starting with the 2010-2011 season. Bayesian inference was used to estimate model parameters on a season-by-season basis to assess the impact of targeting 2- and 3-year-old children for influenza vaccination. This provided the basis for the construction of counterfactual scenarios comparing vaccination rates of ~2% and ~35% in the 2- and 3- year-old population to estimate reductions in general practitioner (GP) influenza-like-illness (ILI) consultations, respiratory hospitalizations and deaths in the overall population. RESULTS: Our model was able to replicate the main patterns of influenza across the four seasons as observed through laboratory surveillance data. Targeting 2- and 3-year-old children for influenza vaccination resulted in reductions in the general population of between 6.2-9.9% in influenza-attributable GP ILI consultations, 6.1-10.7% in influenza-attributable respiratory hospitalizations, and 5.7-9.4% in influenza-attributable deaths. The decrease in influenza-attributable ILI consultations represents a reduction of between 4.5% and 7.3% across all ILI consultations. The reduction in influenza-attributable respiratory hospitalizations represents a reduction of between 1.2% and 2.3% across all respiratory hospitalizations. Reductions in influenza-attributable respiratory deaths represent a reduction of between 0.9% and 2.4% in overall respiratory deaths. CONCLUSION: This study has provided evidence that extending routine influenza vaccination to all healthy children aged 2 and 3 years old leads to benefits in terms of reduced utilization of healthcare resources and fewer respiratory health outcomes and deaths.


Assuntos
Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/imunologia , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H3N2/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/economia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Vacinação em Massa/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Teorema de Bayes , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Feminino , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Influenza Humana/imunologia , Influenza Humana/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Visita a Consultório Médico/estatística & dados numéricos , Estações do Ano , Análise de Sobrevida
8.
Clin Ther ; 35(12): 1923-32, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24275622

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Differences in treatment patterns, health care resource use, and costs are expected among patients newly treated with quetiapine extended release (XR) or quetiapine immediate release (IR). OBJECTIVE: To compare treatment patterns, health care resource use, and costs in patients with bipolar disorder newly treated with quetiapine XR or quetiapine IR. METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective cohort study that used HealthCore Integrated Research Database-identified patients (age range, 18-64 years) with an International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision diagnosis of bipolar disorder and ≥1 pharmacy claim for quetiapine XR or quetiapine IR between October 2, 2008, and July 31, 2010. Outcomes were as follows: patient characteristics at the index date (first claim for quetiapine XR or quetiapine IR); 12-month preindex clinical characteristics, health care resource use, and costs; and 12-month postindex treatment patterns, health care resource use, and costs, assessed using generalized linear models (adjusted for index date and preindex patient demographic characteristics, clinical characteristics, health care resource use, and costs). RESULTS: In total, 3049 patients with bipolar disorder were analyzed (651 in the quetiapine XR group and 2398 in the quetiapine IR group). Of patients initiating treatment with quetiapine XR, 8.8% had no change in or discontinuation of their index therapy compared with 5.7% of patients treated with quetiapine IR (adjusted odds ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.00; P = 0.0317). The average daily dose (adjusted mean) of quetiapine XR was higher than quetiapine IR (225 vs 175 mg/d, P < 0.0001). An average daily dose of 300 to 800 mg was reached sooner (15.6 vs 30.8 days, P = 0.0049) and in more patients (44.2% vs 27.2%, P < 0.0001) who were taking quetiapine XR compared with patients taking quetiapine IR. No differences in total health care costs were found between the cohorts; however, patients taking quetiapine XR were less likely to be hospitalized for mental health-related reasons (12.1% vs 18.3%, P = 0.0022) and incurred lower mental health-related costs (US $6686 vs US $7577, P = 0.0063) compared with patients taking quetiapine IR. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment patterns and dosing differ in patients with bipolar disorder treated with quetiapine XR compared with those treated with quetiapine IR. Mental health-related hospitalizations and costs may be reduced in the 12 months after patients initiating treatment with quetiapine XR compared with initiating treatment with quetiapine IR.


Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/economia , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Bipolar/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Bipolar/economia , Dibenzotiazepinas/economia , Dibenzotiazepinas/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/administração & dosagem , Preparações de Ação Retardada , Dibenzotiazepinas/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fumarato de Quetiapina , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
9.
Patient Educ Couns ; 69(1-3): 165-95, 2007 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17942272

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an advance directive redesigned to meet most adults' literacy needs (fifth grade reading level with graphics) was more useful for advance care planning than a standard form (>12th grade level). METHODS: We enrolled 205 English and Spanish-speaking patients, aged >/=50 years from an urban, general medicine clinic. We randomized participants to review either form. Main outcomes included acceptability and usefulness in advance care planning. Participants then reviewed the alternate form; we assessed form preference and six-month completion rates. RESULTS: Forty percent of enrolled participants had limited literacy. Compared to the standard form, the redesigned form was rated higher for acceptability and usefulness in care planning, P

Assuntos
Diretivas Antecipadas/psicologia , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Comportamento de Escolha , Termos de Consentimento/normas , Escolaridade , Adulto , Diretivas Antecipadas/estatística & dados numéricos , Compreensão , Termos de Consentimento/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise Fatorial , Feminino , Seguimentos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Renda , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Multilinguismo , Análise Multivariada , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , São Francisco , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA