Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Health Equity ; 7(1): 280-289, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37284534

RESUMO

Introduction: Black adults are disproportionately burdened by hypertension. Income inequality is associated with elevated risk of hypertension. Minimum wage increases have been explored as a potential policy lever to address the disparate impact of hypertension on this population. However, these increases may have no significant impact on health among Black adults due to structural racism and "diminished gain" of health effects from socioeconomic resources. This study assesses the relationship between state minimum wage increases and Black-White disparities in hypertension. Methods: We merged state-level minimum wage data with survey data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2001-2019). Odd survey years included questions about hypertension. Separate difference-in-difference models estimated the odds of hypertension among Black and White adults in states with and without minimum wage increases. Difference-in-difference-in-difference models estimated the impact of minimum wage increases on hypertension among Black adults relative to White adults. Results: As state wage limits increase, the odds of hypertension significantly decreased among Black adults overall. This relationship is largely driven by the impact of these policies on Black women. However, the Black-White disparity in hypertension worsened as state minimum wage limits increased, and the magnitude of this disparity was larger among women. Conclusion: States having a minimum wage above the federal wage limit are not sufficient to combat structural racism and reduce the disparities in hypertension among Black adults. Rather, future research should explore livable wages as a policy lever to reduce disparities in hypertension among Black adults.

2.
J Health Care Poor Underserved ; 33(2): 571-579, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35574860

RESUMO

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of mortality among U.S. adults, especially low-income and uninsured adults. Non-Hispanic Black adults, who are overrepresented among low-income and uninsured populations, are disproportionately burdened by CVD mortality compared with non-Hispanic White adults. Medicaid expansion is associated with improved insurance coverage and access to care among low-income adults as well as reduced CVD mortality. It is unclear whether Medicaid expansion has reduced the Black-White disparity in CVD mortality. This study estimated a difference-in-differences model to compare changes in county-level CVD mortality ratios between expansion and non-expansion states. Findings indicate that Medicaid expansion is not associated with a statistically significant reduction in Black-White disparities in CVD mortality (ß = -.039; p =.30). In conclusion, Medicaid expansion may be associated with improved health outcomes and access to care overall; however, it is insufficient to overcome other (i.e., social and economic) drivers of racial/ethnic disparities in CVD mortality.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Medicaid , Adulto , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
Popul Health Manag ; 24(5): 560-566, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33535014

RESUMO

States have the latitude to mandate coverage of diabetes self-management education (DSME) services for privately insured and Medicaid patients. The impact of these mandates on the supply of DSME resources is unknown. This study compared changes in the supply of DSME programs and program sites accredited by the American Association for Diabetes Educators (AADE) and certified diabetes educators (CDE) between states that did and did not mandate benefits for DSME. Using a unique combination of legal and programmatic data sources, the authors employed fixed effects regression models with clustered robust standard errors to compare changes in the supply of AADE-accredited DSME programs, program sites, and CDEs in states that mandated benefits with states that did not. Given the variation in state mandates, models also estimated the impact of "flexible" reimbursement provisions on the supply of resources among adopting states. The supply of DSME resources has increased over time, but results indicate that mandated benefits were not a significant driver of these changes in the supply. The impact of flexible reimbursement provisions varied. Interestingly, provisions of the Affordable Care Act were associated with an increased supply of resources. Results suggest that extending benefits to previously insured patients does not increase the supply of DSME resources, but a rapid increase in patients entering the health system does encourage growth.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Educação em Saúde , Humanos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Autocuidado , Estados Unidos
4.
Public Health Rep ; 134(1): 63-71, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30500307

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Given public health's emphasis on health disparities in underrepresented racial/ethnic minority communities, having a racially and ethnically diverse faculty is important to ensure adequate public health training. We examined trends in the number of underrepresented racial/ethnic minority (ie, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, American Indian/Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander) doctoral graduates from public health fields and determined the proportion of persons from underrepresented racial/ethnic minority groups who entered academia. METHODS: We analyzed repeated cross-sectional data from restricted files collected by the National Science Foundation on doctoral graduates from US institutions during 2003-2015. Our dependent variables were the number of all underrepresented racial/ethnic minority public health doctoral recipients and underrepresented racial/ethnic minority graduates who had accepted academic positions. Using logistic regression models and adjusted odds ratios (aORs), we examined correlates of these variables over time, controlling for all independent variables (eg, gender, age, relationship status, number of dependents). RESULTS: The percentage of underrepresented racial/ethnic minority doctoral graduates increased from 15.4% (91 of 592) in 2003 to 23.4% (296 of 1264) in 2015, with the largest increase occurring among black graduates (from 6.6% in 2003 to 14.1% in 2015). Black graduates (310 of 1241, 25.0%) were significantly less likely than white graduates (2258 of 5913, 38.2%) and, frequently, less likely than graduates from other underrepresented racial/ethnic minority groups to indicate having accepted an academic position (all P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Stakeholders should consider targeted programs to increase the number of racial/ethnic minority faculty members in academic public health fields.


Assuntos
Diversidade Cultural , Educação de Pós-Graduação , Docentes , Grupos Minoritários/educação , Seleção de Pessoal/tendências , Saúde Pública/educação , Racismo/etnologia , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Grupos Minoritários/estatística & dados numéricos , Seleção de Pessoal/estatística & dados numéricos , Racismo/estatística & dados numéricos , Racismo/tendências , Estados Unidos
5.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc ; 2018: 313-320, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30815070

RESUMO

Evidence suggests that health information exchange (HIE) is an effective strategy to improve efficiency and quality of care, as well as reduce costs. A complex patchwork of federal and state legislation has developed over time to encourage HIE activity. Hospitals and health systems have adopted various HIE models to meet the requirements of these statutes and regulations. Given the complexity of HIE laws, it is important to understand how these legal levers influence HIE engagement. We combined data from two unique data sources to examine the association between state-level HIE laws and hospital engagement in community HIEs. Our results identified three legal provisions of state laws (HIE authorization, financial & non-financial incentives, opt-out consent) that increased the likelihood of community HIE engagement. Other provisions decreased the likelihood of engagement. This analysis provides foundational evidence about the utility of HIE laws. More research is needed to determine causal relationships.


Assuntos
Redes Comunitárias , Relações Comunidade-Instituição , Troca de Informação em Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Administração Hospitalar , Governo Estadual , Análise de Variância , Estudos Transversais , Número de Leitos em Hospital , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/legislação & jurisprudência , Legislação Hospitalar , Reembolso de Incentivo , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA