Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Public Health ; 19(Suppl 3): 474, 2019 May 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32326929

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We describe the epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of culture-confirmed Shigella infections in facility-based surveillance sites in Guatemala. Current studies using quantitative molecular diagnostics suggest Shigella may contribute most to the global diarrheal disease burden. Since identification of Shigella requires culturing techniques using stool specimens and few laboratories in Guatemala routinely culture for this pathogen, little is known about the true burden of Shigella in Guatemala or, importantly, the antimicrobial resistance patterns. METHODS: Clinical, epidemiological, and laboratory data were collected on 5399 patients with acute diarrhea (≥3 loose stools in 24 h) from June 2007-August 2012. Multidrug resistance (MDR) was defined as resistance to ampicillin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. RESULTS: Five percent (261) of stool specimens yielded Shigella spp. The annual incidence of laboratory-confirmed infections ranged from 5.0 to 24.1 per 100,000 persons in Santa Rosa and 0.3 to 6.2 per 100,000 in Quetzaltenango; 58% of cases occurred in children < 5 years of age. Thirty patients were hospitalized; one patient died. Oral rehydration or intravenous solution was used to treat 72% of hospitalized and 15% of ambulatory cases. Fifty-nine percent of cases were S. flexneri and 51% of cases were MDR. CONCLUSIONS: Shigella is an important cause of bacterial diarrhea in children and prevalence of MDR highlights the importance of appropriate treatment regimens. This study demonstrates that strengthening laboratory capacity in Guatemala can help determine causes which can lead to prevention of diarrheal diseases, particularly in children. Such capacity building is also critical for rapid detection and control of public health threats at their source and therefore for global health security.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Diarreia/epidemiologia , Disenteria Bacilar/epidemiologia , Vigilância da População , Shigella , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Diarreia/microbiologia , Disenteria Bacilar/microbiologia , Feminino , Guatemala/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Masculino , Prevalência
2.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 11(9): e0005783, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28892479

RESUMO

Chagas disease is a neglected tropical disease that continues to affect populations living in extreme poverty in Latin America. After successful vector control programs, congenital transmission remains as a challenge to disease elimination. We used the PRECEDE-PROCEED planning model to develop strategies for neonatal screening of congenital Chagas disease in rural communities of Guatemala. These communities have persistent high triatomine infestations and low access to healthcare. We used mixed methods with multiple stakeholders to identify and address maternal-infant health behaviors through semi-structured interviews, participatory group meetings, archival reviews and a cross-sectional survey in high risk communities. From December 2015 to April 2016, we jointly developed a strategy to illustratively advertise newborn screening at the Health Center. The strategy included socioculturally appropriate promotional and educational material, in collaboration with midwives, nurses and nongovernmental organizations. By March 2016, eight of 228 (3.9%) pregnant women had been diagnosed with T. cruzi at the Health Center. Up to this date, no neonatal screening had been performed. By August 2016, seven of eight newborns born to Chagas seropositive women had been parasitologically screened at the Health Center, according to international standards. Thus, we implemented a successful community-based neonatal screening strategy to promote congenital Chagas disease healthcare in a rural setting. The success of the health promotion strategies developed will depend on local access to maternal-infant services, integration with detection of other congenital diseases and reliance on community participation in problem and solution definition.


Assuntos
Doença de Chagas/congênito , Doença de Chagas/epidemiologia , Erradicação de Doenças , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas/prevenção & controle , Triagem Neonatal , Doença de Chagas/prevenção & controle , Doença de Chagas/transmissão , Estudos Transversais , Guatemala/epidemiologia , Administração de Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Entrevistas como Assunto , População Rural
3.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 75(3): 416-20, 2006 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16968914

RESUMO

The costs of mefloquine, chloroquine, doxycycline, primaquine, and atovaquone/proguanil are calculated for various durations of exposure to malaria. The cost is included for detecting glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency before administering primaquine for primary or terminal prophylaxis. For durations of exposure ranging from 3 to 730 days, if no terminal prophylaxis is given, doxycycline (generic) is the least expensive regimen. Compared with doxycycline hyclate, chloroquine costs three to four times more, and primaquine, after screening for G6PD, costs about eight times more. Atovaquone/proguanil is less expensive than mefloquine for a 3-day exposure, but more expensive for 7 or more days. When terminal chemoprophylaxis with primaquine for 14 days is used in addition to doxycycline, mefloquine, chloroquine, or atovaquone/proguanil, primaquine alone is the least expensive regimen for exposures of < 10 days. Thereafter, doxycycline plus 14 days of primaquine is most economical. For subsequent exposures when G6PD status is already known, primaquine alone is the least expensive regimen for up to 9 days of exposure, but doxycycline is less expensive thereafter. In general, generic doxycycline hyclate is the least expensive regimen. Primaquine alone is economically attractive. Mefloquine, doxycyline monohydrate, and atovaquone/proguanil, the most expensive regimens, are similar in cost for a 7-day exposure, but thereafter, atovaquone/proguanil is much more expensive.


Assuntos
Antimaláricos/uso terapêutico , Custos de Medicamentos , Malária/prevenção & controle , Primaquina/uso terapêutico , Antimaláricos/economia , Deficiência de Glucosefosfato Desidrogenase , Humanos , Primaquina/economia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA