Prospective Assessment of Treatment-Induced Liver Injury as a Cause of Diffuse Pathologic Hepatic Enhancement in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.

OBJECTIVE: A hypo-enhancement of the liver in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), pathologic one-minute hepatic enhancement (pOMHE), was recently observed in 70% of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients with a high-risk profile for veno-occlusive disease (VOD). Whether pOMHE was a pre-clinical sign of VOD or an unspecific feature of liver damage secondary to intensive chemotherapy is unclear. METHODS: To investigate this, we studied CEUS patterns in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy prior to autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) or intensive induction therapy (IT) for the treatment of acute leukemia. From April 2020 to May 2021, patients undergoing auto-HSCT (n = 20) or acute leukemia patients prior to IT (n = 20) were included. All patients underwent a B-mode ultrasound and CEUS of the liver and spleen before treatment (d0) and on day 10 (d10) after therapy start. The one-minute hepatic enhancement was quantified. An optical density of liver enhancement less than 90% compared with the spleen was considered pathologic (pOMHE). Clinical and laboratory parameters used to assess a drug-induced liver injury (DILI) were documented. RESULTS: The OMHE was normal (d0 and d10) in 36 (90%) patients. After IT, 2 of 20 patients had a pOMHE. A DILI grade IV was diagnosed in one case and hyperfibrinolysis in the second case. In 2 of 20 (5%) auto-HSCT patients a pOMHE was observed at d10 without clinical symptoms. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy-induced effects are not the cause of a pathologic liver enhancement. In contrast, severe DILI or hyperfibrinolysis can be associated with pOMHE.

Assessment of Early Therapy Response of Non-Hodgkin's and Hodgkin's Lymphoma Using B-Mode Ultrasound and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.

OBJECTIVES: Here we asked, whether contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) enables to judge early treatment response in malignant lymphoma as a potential guidance for further treatment. METHODS: From May 2017 to May 2018, 21 patients with histologically confirmed diagnosis of lymphoma were examined by B-mode ultrasound (B-US) and CEUS at fixed early time points after commencing therapy (days [d] 0, 15 and 30 after therapy start) and contrast enhancement patterns in target lymphoma lesions were quantified using Bracco-VUE Box® (DCE-US). To estimate the potential value of CEUS-enhancement patterns for early response prediction, patients were grouped according to their best achieved actual response into complete remission (CR) patients, partial remission (PR) patients or progressive disease (PD) patients. RESULTS: Between d0, d15 and d30, CR-patients showed a median lymphoma shrinking by 34% in B-US. PD-patients experienced a median lymphoma size reduction by 44% on day 15, but lymphoma mass again increased by 20% between d15 and d30. In contrast, the median CEUS enhancement intensity, as assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) was increasing at d15 in CR and PD patients (CR to 152%, PD: to 126%), but decreased at d30 to 14% in CR patients and 22% in PD patients. CONCLUSIONS: While early response assessment using B-US might be useful to predict treatment response in lymphoma, CEUS and DCE-US-although often feasible-do not provide additional value in this regard.