Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 36
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Psychogeriatr ; 35(11): 664-672, 2023 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37066690

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This paper used data from the Apathy in Dementia Methylphenidate Trial 2 (NCT02346201) to conduct a planned cost consequence analysis to investigate whether treatment of apathy with methylphenidate is economically attractive. METHODS: A total of 167 patients with clinically significant apathy randomized to either methylphenidate or placebo were included. The Resource Utilization in Dementia Lite instrument assessed resource utilization for the past 30 days and the EuroQol five dimension five level questionnaire assessed health utility at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Resources were converted to costs using standard sources and reported in 2021 USD. A repeated measures analysis of variance compared change in costs and utility over time between the treatment and placebo groups. A binary logistic regression was used to assess cost predictors. RESULTS: Costs were not significantly different between groups whether the cost of methylphenidate was excluded (F(2,330) = 0.626, ηp2 = 0.004, p = 0.535) or included (F(2,330) = 0.629, ηp2 = 0.004, p = 0.534). Utility improved with methylphenidate treatment as there was a group by time interaction (F(2,330) = 7.525, ηp2 = 0.044, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Results from this study indicated that there was no evidence for a difference in resource utilization costs between methylphenidate and placebo treatment. However, utility improved significantly over the 6-month follow-up period. These results can aid in decision-making to improve quality of life in patients with Alzheimer's disease while considering the burden on the healthcare system.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Apatia , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central , Metilfenidato , Humanos , Metilfenidato/uso terapêutico , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/uso terapêutico , Qualidade de Vida , Doença de Alzheimer/tratamento farmacológico
2.
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc ; 2022: 3464-3467, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36086652

RESUMO

We present a cloud-based multimodal dialogue platform for the remote assessment and monitoring of speech, facial and fine motor function in Parkinson's Disease (PD) at scale, along with a preliminary investigation of the efficacy of the various metrics automatically extracted by the platform. 22 healthy controls and 38 people with Parkinson's Disease (pPD) were instructed to complete four interactive sessions, spaced a week apart, on the platform. Each session involved a battery of tasks designed to elicit speech, facial movements and finger movements. We find that speech, facial kinematic and finger movement dexterity metrics show statistically significant differences between controls and pPD. We further investigate the sensitivity, specificity, reliability and generalisability of these metrics. Our results offer encouraging evidence for the utility of automatically-extracted audiovisual analytics in remote mon-itoring of PD and other movement disorders.


Assuntos
Doença de Parkinson , Fala , Dedos , Humanos , Movimento , Doença de Parkinson/diagnóstico , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
3.
JCO Glob Oncol ; 7: 1032-1066, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34185571

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To provide expert guidance to clinicians and policymakers in three resource-constrained settings on diagnosis and staging of adult women with ovarian masses and treatment of patients with epithelial ovarian (including fallopian tube and primary peritoneal) cancer. METHODS: A multidisciplinary, multinational ASCO Expert Panel reviewed existing guidelines, conducted a modified ADAPTE process, and conducted a formal consensus process with additional experts. RESULTS: Existing sets of guidelines from eight guideline developers were found and reviewed for resource-constrained settings; adapted recommendations from nine guidelines form the evidence base, informing two rounds of formal consensus; and all recommendations received ≥ 75% agreement. RECOMMENDATIONS: Evaluation of adult symptomatic women in all settings includes symptom assessment, family history, and ultrasound and cancer antigen 125 serum tumor marker levels where feasible. In limited and enhanced settings, additional imaging may be requested. Diagnosis, staging, and/or treatment involves surgery. Presurgical workup of every suspected ovarian cancer requires a metastatic workup. Only trained clinicians with logistical support should perform surgical staging; treatment requires histologic confirmation; surgical goal is staging disease and performing complete cytoreduction to no gross residual disease. In first-line therapy, platinum-based chemotherapy is recommended; in advanced stages, patients may receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, all patients should be evaluated for interval debulking surgery. Targeted therapy is not recommended in basic or limited settings. Specialized interventions are resource-dependent, for example, laparoscopy, fertility-sparing surgery, genetic testing, and targeted therapy. Multidisciplinary cancer care and palliative care should be offered.Additional information can be found at www.asco.org/resource-stratified-guidelines. It is ASCO's view that health care providers and health care system decision makers should be guided by the recommendations for the highest stratum of resources available. The guideline is intended to complement but not replace local guidelines.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ovarianas , Adulto , Antígeno Ca-125 , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/terapia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução , Feminino , Humanos , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Neoplasias Ovarianas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/terapia
4.
Surg Neurol Int ; 11: 72, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32363067

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cancer pain can be debilitating and 10-20% of patients will have refractory pain despite optimal medical management. Here, we present a cost comparison of treating terminal cancer patients with intravenous (IV) narcotics, anterolateral cordotomy, or intrathecal pain pump (ITPP) placement. CASE DESCRIPTION: We evaluated and treated 2 patients with metastatic breast cancer and expected survivals of <1 year. The first patient, a 53-year-old female, had tumor invasion of the right chest wall and had failed oral pain regimens; she was admitted to receive IV Dilaudid as patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). After 7 days of treatment without improvement, she underwent a left-sided C1-2 cordotomy. For her, the cost of the cordotomy was $18,462 and the expenses for 7 days hospital stay with PCA was $89,884; the total was $108,346. The second patient, a 60-year-old female, had severe somatic pain due to invasion by tumor of the left knee cap. She, too, has failed oral therapy and was receiving in-hospital IV Dilaudid PCA. Following 2 days of failed treatment, a morphine ITPP was placed and effectively treated her pain. In patient 2, the cost of the ITPP was $80,603 and the expenses for 8 days of the hospital stay with PCA came to $84,785; the total was $165,389. CONCLUSION: The treatment of refractory pain in cancer patients is challenging. It requires invasive procedures such as cordotomy or ITPP. Although procedures may yield comparable pain control, there was a significant cost savings for cordotomy versus ITPP ($57,043 saved).

5.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 27(8): 794-805, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30926273

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the extent and identify predictors of potentially inappropriate antidepressant use among older adults with dementia and newly diagnosed major depressive disorders (MDD). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included older adults (aged ≥65 years) with dementia and newly diagnosed MDD using Medicare 5% sample claims data (2012-2013). Based on Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set guidelines, intake period for new antidepressant medication use was from May 1, 2012, through April 30, 2013. Index prescription start date was the first date of antidepressant prescription claim during the intake period. Dependent variable of this study was potentially inappropriate antidepressant use as defined by the Beers Criteria and the Screening Tool of Older Persons' potentially inappropriate Prescriptions criteria. The authors conducted multiple logistic regression analysis to identify individual-level predictors of potentially inappropriate antidepressant use. RESULTS: The authors' final study sample consisted of 7,625 older adults with dementia and newly diagnosed MDD, among which 7.59% (N = 579) initiated treatment with a potentially inappropriate antidepressant. Paroxetine (N = 394) was the most commonly initiated potentially inappropriate antidepressant followed by amitriptyline (N = 104), nortriptyline (N = 35), and doxepin (N = 32). Initiation of a potentially inappropriate antidepressant was associated with age and baseline use of anxiolytic medications. CONCLUSION: More than 7% of older adults in the study sample initiated a potentially inappropriate antidepressant, and the authors identified a few individual-level factors significantly associated with it. Appropriately tailored interventions to address modifiable and nonmodifiable factors significantly associated with potentially inappropriate antidepressant prescribing are required to minimize risks in this vulnerable population.


Assuntos
Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Demência/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Prescrição Inadequada/estatística & dados numéricos , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropriados , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
6.
Obstet Gynecol ; 130(6): 1269-1275, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29112648

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine the cost of care during the first year after a diagnosis of ovarian cancer, estimate the sources of cost, and explore the out-of-pocket costs. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of women with ovarian cancer diagnosed from 2009 to 2012 who underwent both surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy using the Truven Health MarketScan database. This database is comprised of patients covered by commercial insurance sponsored by more than 100 employers in the United States. Medical expenditures, including physician reimbursement, for a 12-month period beginning on the date of surgery were estimated. All payments were examined, including out-of-pocket costs for patients. Payments were divided into expenditures for inpatient care, outpatient care (including chemotherapy), and outpatient drug costs. The 12-month treatment period was divided into three phases: surgery to 30 days (operative period), 1-6 months (adjuvant therapy), and 6-12 months after surgery. The primary outcome was the overall cost of care within the first year of diagnosis of ovarian cancer; secondary outcomes included assessment of factors associated with cost. RESULTS: A total of 26,548 women with ovarian cancer who underwent surgery were identified. After exclusion of patients with incomplete insurance enrollment or coverage, those who did not undergo chemotherapy, and those with capitated plans, our cohort consisted of 5,031 women. The median total medical expenditures per patient during the first year after the index procedure were $93,632 (interquartile range $62,319-140,140). Inpatient services accounted for $30,708 (interquartile range $20,102-51,107; 37.8%) in expenditures, outpatient services $52,700 (interquartile range $31,210-83,206; 58.3%), and outpatient drug costs $1,814 (interquartile range $603-4,402; 3.8%). The median out-of-pocket expense was $2,988 (interquartile range $1,649-5,088). This included $1,509 (interquartile range $705-2,878) for outpatient services, $589 (interquartile range $3-1,715) for inpatient services, and $351 (interquartile range $149-656) for outpatient drug costs. CONCLUSION: The average cost of care for women with ovarian cancer in the first year after surgery is approximately $100,000. Patients bear approximately 3% of these costs in the form of out-of-pocket expenses.


Assuntos
Quimioterapia Adjuvante/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Ovarianas , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente , Adulto , Idoso , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Estudos de Coortes , Alocação de Custos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Neoplasias Ovarianas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/terapia , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/economia , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
7.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 217(6): 669.e1-669.e13, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28844824

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Uterine-preserving therapy with progesterone may be used in young women with endometrial cancer who desire fertility preservation. Such therapy delays definitive treatment with hysterectomy. OBJECTIVE: We examined the use and safety of progestational therapy in young women with endometrial cancer. The primary outcome of the analysis was overall survival. STUDY DESIGN: We identified women ≤49 years of age with stage I endometrial cancer in the National Cancer Database from 2004 through 2014. Women treated with hormonal therapy with or without hysterectomy were compared to women treated with hysterectomy. After propensity score weighting, overall survival was examined using proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 23,231 patients, including 872 (3.8%) women treated with hormonal therapy were identified. Use of hormonal therapy was 2.4% (95% confidence interval, 1.8-3.3%) in 2004 and increased over time to 5.9% (95% confidence interval, 5.0-6.9%) by 2014 (P < .0001). Use of hormonal therapy decreased with older age, higher substage, and increasing grade. Black women were more likely to receive hormonal therapy while Medicaid recipients were less likely to receive hormonal therapy. The 5-year survival for patients treated with hormonal therapy was 96.4% (95% confidence interval, 94.3-98.0%) compared to 97.2% (95% confidence interval, 96.9-97.4%) for hysterectomy. In a multivariable model, women treated with hormonal therapy were 92% (hazard ratio, 1.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-3.19) more likely to die compared to women who underwent primary hysterectomy. When stratified by stage, hormonal therapy was associated with increased mortality in women with stage IB and I-not otherwise specified tumors but not for stage IA neoplasms. CONCLUSION: Use of progestational therapy is increasing. Its use was associated with decreased survival, particularly in women with stage IB tumors.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Endometrioide/tratamento farmacológico , Causas de Morte , Neoplasias do Endométrio/tratamento farmacológico , Progesterona/uso terapêutico , Progestinas/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Carcinoma Endometrioide/patologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Feminino , Preservação da Fertilidade , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Histerectomia , Seguro Saúde , Modelos Lineares , Medicaid , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão , Pontuação de Propensão , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estados Unidos , Útero , População Branca
8.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 217(4): 434.e1-434.e10, 2017 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28709581

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: High-intensity care including hospitalizations, chemotherapy, and other interventions at the end of life is costly and often of little value for cancer patients. Little is known about patterns of end-of-life care and resource utilization for women with uterine cancer. OBJECTIVE: We examined the costs and predictors of aggressive end-of-life care for women with uterine cancer. STUDY DESIGN: In this observational cohort study the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked database was used to identify women age ≥65 years who died from uterine cancer from 2000 through 2011. Resource utilization in the last month of life including ≥2 hospital admissions, >1 emergency department visit, ≥1 intensive care unit admission, or use of chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life was examined. High-intensity care was defined as the occurrence of any of the above outcomes. Logistic regression models were developed to identify factors associated with high-intensity care. Total Medicare expenditures in the last month of life are reported. RESULTS: Of the 5873 patients identified, the majority had stage IV cancer (30.2%), were white (79.9%), and had endometrioid tumors (47.6%). High-intensity care was rendered to 42.5% of women. During the last month of life, 15.0% had ≥2 hospital admissions, 9.0% had a hospitalization >14 days, 15.3% had >1 emergency department visits, 18.3% had an intensive care unit admission, and 6.6% received chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life. The percentage of women who received high-intensity care was stable over the study period. Characteristics of younger age, black race, higher number of comorbidities, stage IV disease, residence in the eastern United States, and more recent diagnosis were associated with high-intensity care. The median Medicare payment during the last month of life was $7645. Total per beneficiary Medicare payments remained stable from $9656 (interquartile range $3190-15,890) in 2000 to $9208 (interquartile range $3309-18,554) by 2011. The median health care expenditure was 4 times as high for those who received high-intensity care compared to those who did not (median $16,173 vs $4099). CONCLUSION: Among women with uterine cancer, high-intensity care is common in the last month of life, associated with substantial monetary expenditures, and does not appear to be decreasing.


Assuntos
Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Uterinas/economia , Neoplasias Uterinas/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Endometrioide/economia , Carcinoma Endometrioide/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Endometrioide/patologia , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitais para Doentes Terminais , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/economia , Cuidados Paliativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Programa de SEER , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Uterinas/patologia
9.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 217(1): 49.e1-49.e10, 2017 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28288792

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ectopic pregnancy is common among young women. Treatment can consist of either surgery with salpingectomy or salpingostomy or medical management with methotrexate. In addition to acute complications, treatment of ectopic pregnancy can result in long-term sequelae that include decreased fertility. Little is known about the patterns of care and predictors of treatment in women with ectopic pregnancy. Similarly, data on outcomes for various treatments are limited. OBJECTIVE: We examined the patterns of care and outcomes for women with ectopic pregnancy. Specifically, we examined predictors of medical (vs surgical) management of ectopic pregnancy and tubal conservation (salpingostomy vs salpingectomy) among women who underwent surgery. STUDY DESIGN: The Perspective database was used to identify women with a diagnosis of tubal ectopic pregnancy treated from 2006-2015. Perspective is an all-payer database that collects data on patients at hospitals from throughout the United States. Women were classified as having undergone medical treatment, if they received methotrexate, and surgical treatment, if treatment consisted of salpingostomy or salpingectomy. Multivariable models were developed to examine predictors of medical treatment and of tubal conserving salpingostomy among women who were treated surgically. RESULTS: Among the 62,588 women, 49,090 women (78.4%) were treated surgically, and 13,498 women (21.6%) received methotrexate. Use of methotrexate increased from 14.5% in 2006 to 27.3% by 2015 (P<.001). Among women who underwent surgery, salpingostomy decreased over time from 13.0% in 2006 to 6.0% in 2015 (P<.001). Treatment in more recent years, at a teaching hospital and at higher volume centers, were associated with the increased use of methotrexate (P<.05 for all). In contrast, Medicaid recipients (adjusted risk ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.98) and uninsured women (adjusted risk ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.93) were less likely to receive methotrexate than commercially insured patients. Among those who underwent surgery, black (adjusted risk ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.85) and Hispanic (adjusted risk ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.96) patients were less likely to undergo tubal conserving surgery than white women and Medicaid recipients (adjusted risk ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.75); uninsured women (adjusted risk ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.66) less frequently underwent salpingostomy than commercially insured patients. CONCLUSION: There is substantial variation in the management of ectopic pregnancy. There are significant race- and insurance-related disparities associated with treatment.


Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez Ectópica/tratamento farmacológico , Gravidez Ectópica/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Abortivos não Esteroides , Adulto , População Negra , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Infertilidade Feminina/epidemiologia , Medicaid , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde , Metotrexato/efeitos adversos , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Gravidez Tubária/tratamento farmacológico , Gravidez Tubária/cirurgia , Salpingectomia/efeitos adversos , Salpingectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Salpingostomia/efeitos adversos , Salpingostomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , População Branca , Adulto Jovem
10.
Obstet Gynecol ; 128(4): 754-60, 2016 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27607871

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine the use and predictors of sentinel node biopsy in women with vulvar cancer. METHODS: The Perspective database, an all-payer database that collects data from more than 500 hospitals, was used to perform a retrospective cohort study of women with vulvar cancer who underwent vulvectomy and lymph node assessment from 2006 to 2015. Multivariable models were used to determine factors associated with sentinel node biopsy. Length of stay and cost were compared between women who underwent sentinel node biopsy and lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: Among 2,273 women, sentinel node biopsy was utilized in 618 (27.2%) and 1,655 (72.8%) underwent inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy. Performance of sentinel node biopsy increased from 17.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.0-22.0%) in 2006 to 39.1% (95% CI 27.1-51.0%) in 2015. In a multivariable model, women treated more recently were more likely to have undergone sentinel node biopsy, whereas women with more comorbidities and those treated at rural hospitals were less likely to have undergone the procedure. The median length of stay was shorter for those undergoing sentinel node biopsy (median 2 days, interquartile range 1-3) compared with women who underwent inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (median 3 days, interquartile range 2-4). The cost of sentinel node biopsy was $7,599 (interquartile range $5,739-9,922) compared with $8,095 (interquartile range $5,917-11,281) for lymphadenectomy. CONCLUSION: The use of sentinel node biopsy for vulvar cancer has more than doubled since 2006. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is associated with a shorter hospital stay and decreased cost compared with inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy.


Assuntos
Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Vulvares/patologia , Neoplasias Vulvares/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Rurais/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais de Ensino/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Urbanos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Canal Inguinal , Tempo de Internação , Excisão de Linfonodo/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/economia , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/tendências
11.
JAMA Surg ; 151(7): 612-20, 2016 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26886156

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Despite the lack of efficacy data, robotic-assisted surgery has diffused rapidly into practice. Marketing to physicians, hospitals, and patients has been widespread, but how this marketing has contributed to the diffusion of the technology remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of regional hospital competition and hospital financial status on the use of robotic-assisted surgery for 5 commonly performed procedures. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cohort study of 221 637 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy, total nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, hysterectomy, or oophorectomy at 1370 hospitals in the United States from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2011, was conducted. The association between hospital competition, hospital financial status, and performance of robotic-assisted surgery was examined. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The association between hospital competition was measured with the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), hospital financial status was estimated as operating margin, and performance of robotic-assisted surgery was examined using multivariate mixed-effects regression models. RESULTS: We identified 221 637 patients who underwent one of the procedures of interest. The cohort included 30 345 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy; 20 802, total nephrectomy; 8060, partial nephrectomy; 134 985, hysterectomy; and 27 445, oophorectomy. Robotic-assisted operations were performed for 20 500 (67.6%) radical prostatectomies, 1405 (6.8%) total nephrectomies, 2759 (34.2%) partial nephrectomies, 14 047 (10.4%) hysterectomies, and 1782 (6.5%) oophorectomies. Use of robotic-assisted surgery increased for each procedure from January 2010 through December 2011. For all 5 operations, increased market competition (as measured by the HHI) was associated with increased use of robotic-assisted surgery. For prostatectomy, the risk ratios (95% CIs) for undergoing a robotic-assisted procedure were 2.20 (1.50-3.24) at hospitals in moderately competitive markets and 2.64 (1.84-3.78) for highly competitive markets compared with noncompetitive markets. For hysterectomy, patients at hospitals in moderately (3.75 [2.26-6.25]) and highly (5.30; [3.27-8.57]) competitive markets were more likely to undergo a robotic-assisted surgery. Increased hospital profitability was associated with use of robotic-assisted surgery only for partial nephrectomy in facilities with medium-high (1.67 [1.13-2.48]) and high (1.50 [0.98-2.29]) operating margins. With analysis limited to patients treated at a hospital that had performed robotic-assisted surgery, there was no longer an association between competition and use of robotic-assisted surgery. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Patients undergoing surgery in a hospital in a competitive regional market were more likely to undergo a robotic-assisted procedure. These data imply that regional competition may influence a hospital's decision to acquire a surgical robot.


Assuntos
Competição Econômica/tendências , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Economia Hospitalar , Feminino , Hospitais/tendências , Humanos , Histerectomia/economia , Histerectomia/métodos , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrectomia/economia , Nefrectomia/métodos , Nefrectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Ovariectomia/economia , Ovariectomia/métodos , Ovariectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Prostatectomia/economia , Prostatectomia/métodos , Prostatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/tendências
12.
J Clin Oncol ; 34(10): 1087-96, 2016 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26834057

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Despite the potential benefits of minimally invasive hysterectomy for uterine cancer, population-level data describing the procedure's safety in unselected patients are lacking. We examined the use of minimally invasive surgery and the association between the route of the procedure and long-term survival. METHODS: We used the SEER-Medicare database to identify women with stage I-III uterine cancer who underwent hysterectomy from 2006 to 2011. Patients who underwent abdominal hysterectomy were compared with those who had minimally invasive hysterectomy (laparoscopic and robot-assisted). Perioperative morbidity, use of adjuvant therapy, and long-term survival were examined after propensity score balancing. RESULTS: We identified 6,304 patients, including 4,139 (65.7%) who underwent abdominal hysterectomy and 2,165 (34.3%) who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy; performance of minimally invasive hysterectomy increased from 9.3% in 2006 to 61.7% in 2011. Robot-assisted procedures accounted for 62.3% of the minimally invasive operations. Compared with women who underwent abdominal hysterectomy, minimally invasive hysterectomy was associated with a lower overall complication rate (22.7% v 39.7%; P < .001), and lower perioperative mortality (0.6% v 1.1%), but these women were more likely to receive adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy (34.3% v 31.3%) and brachytherapy (33.6% v 31.0%; P < .05). The complication rate was higher after robot-assisted hysterectomy compared with laparoscopic hysterectomy (23.7% v 19.5%; P = .03). There was no association between the use of minimally invasive hysterectomy and either overall (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.04) or cancer-specific (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.16) mortality. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive hysterectomy does not appear to compromise long-term survival for women with endometrial cancer.


Assuntos
Braquiterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Endométrio/radioterapia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/cirurgia , Histerectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade , Fatores de Confusão Epidemiológicos , Neoplasias do Endométrio/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Histerectomia/mortalidade , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Radioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Programa de SEER , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
13.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 107(11)2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26449386

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Electric power morcellation during laparoscopic hysterectomy allows some women to undergo minimally invasive surgery but may disrupt underlying occult malignancies and increase the risk of tumor dissemination. METHODS: We developed a state transition Markov cohort simulation model of the risks and benefits of hysterectomy (abdominal, laparoscopic, and laparoscopic with electric power morcellation) for women with presumed benign gynecologic disease. The model considered perioperative morbidity, mortality, risk of cancer and dissemination, and outcomes in women with an underlying malignancy. We explored the effectiveness from a societal perspective stratified by age (<40, 40-49, 50-59, and ≥60 years). RESULTS: Under all scenarios, modeled laparoscopic hysterectomy without morcellation was the most beneficial strategy. Laparoscopic hysterectomy with morcellation was associated with 80.83 more intraoperative complications, 199.64 fewer perioperative complications, and 241.80 fewer readmissions than abdominal hysterectomy per 10 000 women. Per 10 000 women younger than age 40 years, laparoscopic hysterectomy with morcellation was associated with 1.57 more cases of disseminated cancer and 0.97 fewer deaths than abdominal hysterectomy. The excess cases of disseminated cancer per 10 000 women with morcellation compared with abdominal hysterectomy increased with age to 47.54 per 10 000 in women age 60 years and older. Compared with abdominal hysterectomy, this resulted in 0.30 (age 40-49 years), 5.07 (age 50-59 years), and 18.14 (age 60 years and older) excess deaths per 10 000 women in the respective age groups. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic hysterectomy without morcellation is the most beneficial approach of the three methods of hysterectomy studied. In older women, the risks of electric power morcellation may outweigh the benefits of minimally invasive hysterectomy.


Assuntos
Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/economia , Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Histerectomia/economia , Histerectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia , Adulto , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Eletricidade , Feminino , Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/mortalidade , Humanos , Leiomioma/economia , Leiomioma/mortalidade , Leiomioma/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Uterinas/economia , Neoplasias Uterinas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirurgia
14.
J Sex Med ; 12(9): 1853-61, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26350584

RESUMO

Penile plethysmography (PPG) is an objective measure of sexual arousal for men, commonly used to assess sexual arousal to both abnormal (i.e., paraphilic) and normal stimuli. While PPG has become a standard measure in the assessment and treatment of male sex offenders and men with paraphilic interests in both Canada and the United States, there is a lack of standardization of stimulus sets and interpretation of results between sites. The current article critically reviews the current state of the art while highlighting clinical and research efforts that may be undertaken in an attempt to reduce issues arising from lack of standardization across sites. Types and themes of stimulus sets, assessment apparatuses, laboratory preparation, and testing procedures are discussed. The continued development of standardized testing protocol and procedures across multiple international sites continues to be encouraged to promote unified PPG administration and interpretation, thus further enhancing the practical utility of the measurements and decreasing inter-rater discrepancies and error.


Assuntos
Transtornos Parafílicos/diagnóstico , Pênis/irrigação sanguínea , Pletismografia , Comportamento Sexual/psicologia , Nível de Alerta/fisiologia , Emoções , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Parafílicos/psicologia , Ereção Peniana , Pletismografia/métodos , Padrões de Referência , Comportamento Sexual/fisiologia , Estados Unidos
15.
Gynecol Oncol ; 139(3): 506-12, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26177552

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Procedural volume is associated with outcomes for many surgical interventions. Little is known about the association between volume and outcomes of radiation. We examined the association between treatment center and hospital volume and outcomes for women with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with radiation. METHODS: Women with stage IIB-IVA cervical cancer treated with primary radiation from 1998 to 2011 and recorded in the National Cancer Database were examined. Hospital volume was estimated as the mean annualized volume, while center-specific effects on care were examined using a hospital-specific random effect. Multivariable regression models adjusted for metrics of treatment quality were used to estimate survival. RESULTS: 20,766 patients treated at 1115 hospitals were identified. The median follow-up was 24.2months while 5-year survival was 36.5% (95% CI, 35.6-37.4%). Higher hospital volume was associated with receipt of brachytherapy (P<0.05), but had no effect on use of chemotherapy. In a multivariable model accounting for clinical and demographic factors as well as quality of care, hospital volume was not associated with survival (P=0.25). The specific hospital in which patients received care was the strongest predictor of survival (P<0.0001) followed by stage, year of diagnosis and treatment quality (P<0.0001 for all). The hospital-specific effect on mortality expressed as a hazard ratio, ranged from 0.66 to 1.53 across hospitals. CONCLUSION: For locally advanced cervical cancer, hospital volume has a minimal impact on outcome; however, the specific center in which care is delivered is strongly associated with survival.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Institutos de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Braquiterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/patologia , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Taxa de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/terapia
16.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 25(6): 1115-20, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26067857

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in gynecologic oncology fellowship training and fellows' predictions of their use of MIS in their future practice. METHODS: All fellows-in-training in American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology-approved training programs were surveyed in 2012 through an online or mailed-paper survey. Data were analyzed and compared to results of a similar 2007 survey. RESULTS: Of 172 fellows, 69 (40%) responded. Ninety-nine percent of respondents (n = 68) indicated that MIS was either very important or important in gynecologic oncology, a proportion essentially unchanged from 2007 (100%). Compared to 2007, greater proportions of fellows considered laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and node dissection for cervical cancer (87% vs 54%; P < 0.0001) and trachelectomy and staging for cervical cancer (83% vs 32%; P < 0.0001) appropriate for MIS. Of the respondents, 92% believed that maximum or some emphasis should be placed on robotic-assisted surgery and 89% on traditional laparoscopy during fellowship training. Ten percent rated their fellowship training in laparoendoscopic single-site surgery as very poor; 44% said that the question was not applicable. Most respondents (60%) in 2012 performed at least 11 procedures per month, whereas most respondents (45%) in 2007 performed 6 to 10 procedures per month (P = 0.005). All respondents at institutions where robotic surgery was used were allowed to operate at the robotic console, and 63% of respondents reported that in robotic-assisted surgery cases when a fellow sat at the robot, the fellow performed more than 50% of the case at the console. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that MIS in gynecologic oncology is here to stay. Fellowship programs should develop a systematic approach to training in MIS and in individual MIS platforms as they become more prevalent. Fellowship programs should also develop and apply an objective assessment of minimum proficiency in MIS to ensure that programs are adequately preparing trainees.


Assuntos
Bolsas de Estudo , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/educação , Oncologia/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/educação , Competência Clínica , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/normas , Feminino , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/diagnóstico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/normas , Humanos , Oncologia/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/normas
17.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 25(6): 1121-7, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25860841

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the current patterns of use of minimally invasive surgical procedures, including traditional, robotic-assisted, and single-port laparoscopy, by Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) members and to compare the results to those of our 2004 and 2007 surveys. METHODS: The Society of Gynecologic Oncology members were surveyed through an online or mailed-paper survey. Data were analyzed and compared with results of our prior surveys. RESULTS: Four hundred six (32%) of 1279 SGO members responded. Eighty-three percent of respondents (n = 337) performed traditional laparoscopic surgery (compared with 84% in 2004 and 91% in 2007). Ninety-seven percent of respondents performed robotic surgery (compared with 27% in 2007). When respondents were asked to indicate procedures that they performed with the robot but not with traditional laparoscopy, 75% indicated radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer. Overall, 70% of respondents indicated that hysterectomy and staging for uterine cancer was the procedure they most commonly performed with a minimally invasive approach. Only 17% of respondents who performed minimally invasive surgery performed single-port laparoscopy, and only 5% of respondents indicated that single-port laparoscopy has an important or very important role in the field. CONCLUSIONS: Since our prior surveys, we found a significant increase in the overall use and indications for robotic surgery. Radical hysterectomy or trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer and total hysterectomy and staging for endometrial cancer were procedures found to be significantly more appropriate for the robotic platform in comparison to traditional laparoscopy. The indications for laparoscopy have expanded beyond endometrial cancer staging to include surgical management of early-stage cervical and ovarian cancers, but the use of single-port laparoscopy remains limited.


Assuntos
Bolsas de Estudo , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Adulto , Idoso , Competência Clínica , Feminino , Seguimentos , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/diagnóstico , Humanos , Histerectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Robótica/métodos
18.
Gynecol Oncol ; 137(2): 280-4, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25735256

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify potential cost savings in gynecologic oncology care without sacrificing quality. METHODS: Members of the Clinical Practice Committee of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology were asked to review current practice patterns in gynecologic oncology and assess the potential for cost savings founded on evidence-based medicine and current guidelines. RESULTS: Five clinical practices were identified including the following: vaginal cytology for endometrial cancer survivors; colposcopy for low grade cytologic abnormalities for cervical cancer survivors; routine imaging studies for gynecologic cancer survivors; screening for ovarian cancer with serum biomarkers and ultrasound; and improving palliative care for gynecologic cancer patients. Review of the published literature and guidelines were performed to make evidence-based recommendations for cost effective quality gynecologic oncology care. RECOMMENDATIONS: • Do not perform Pap tests of the vaginal cuff in patients with a history of endometrial cancer. • Do not perform colposcopy for low grade Pap tests in women with a history of cervical cancer. • Avoid routine imaging for cancer surveillance in asymptomatic women with gynecologic cancer, specifically ovarian, endometrial, cervical, vulvar and vaginal cancer. • Do not screen women at low risk for ovarian cancer with ultrasound or CA-125 or other biomarkers. • Do not delay basic level palliative care for women with advanced or relapsed gynecologic cancer, do refer to a palliative care specialist when needed, and avoid unnecessary treatments at life's end.


Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/economia , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/terapia , Ginecologia/economia , Ginecologia/normas , Oncologia/economia , Oncologia/normas , Adulto , Feminino , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/diagnóstico , Ginecologia/métodos , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento , Oncologia/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Melhoria de Qualidade , Sociedades Médicas
19.
Obstet Gynecol ; 124(5): 886-896, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25437715

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To perform a population-based analysis to compare the complications and cost of laparoscopic and robotically assisted adnexal surgery. METHODS: A nationwide database was used to analyze the use and outcomes of robotically assisted adnexal surgery from 2009 to 2012. Multivariable mixed effects regression models were developed to examine predictors of use of robotic surgery. After propensity score matching, complications and cost were compared between robotically assisted and laparoscopic surgery. RESULTS: Eighty-seven thousand five hundred fourteen women were identified. From 2009 to 2012, performance of robotic-assisted oophorectomy increased from 3.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.2-3.8%) to 15.0% (95% CI 14.4-15.6%), whereas robotically assisted cystectomy rose from 2.4% (95% CI 2.0-2.7%) to 12.9% (95% CI 12.2-13.5%). The overall complication rate was 7.1% (95% CI 4.0-10.2%) for robotically assisted compared with 6.0% (95% CI 2.9-9.1%) for laparoscopic oophorectomy (odds ratio [OR] 1.20, 95% CI 1.00-1.45; P=.052). Robotic-assisted oophorectomy was associated with a higher rate of intraoperative complications (3.4% compared with 2.1%, OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.21-2.13). The overall complication rate was 3.7% (95% CI -0.8 to 8.2%) after robotically assisted compared with 2.7% (95% CI -1.8 to 7.2%) for laparoscopic cystectomy (OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.95-1.99). The intraoperative complication rate was higher for robotically assisted cystectomy (2.0% compared with 0.9%, OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.31-4.38). Compared with laparoscopy, robotically assisted oophorectomy was associated with $2,504 (95% CI $2,356-2,652) increased total costs and robotically assisted cystectomy $3,310 (95% CI $3,082-3,581) higher costs. CONCLUSION: Use of robotically assisted adnexal surgery increased rapidly. Compared with laparoscopic surgery, robotically assisted adnexal surgery is associated with substantially greater costs and a small, but statistically significant, increase in intraoperative complications.


Assuntos
Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Ovariectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Robótica , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Análise de Regressão , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA