Burden of Illness Associated with Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumors.

PURPOSE: Little is known about the burden of illness in patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumors (TGCT), which are rare, typically benign, lesions of the synovial tissue including giant cell tumor of the tendon sheath (GCT-TS) and pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS). The objective of this study was to describe health care resource use and costs for patients with GCT-TS and PVNS, which are rare and typically benign TGCT. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study design was used to analyze administrative claims for adult commercial and Medicare Advantage health plan enrollees with evidence of GCT-TS and PVNS from January 1, 2006 through March 31, 2015. Participants were continuously enrolled for 12 months before (pre-index period) and 12 months after (post-index period) the date of the first tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) claim (index date). Preindex and postindex measures were compared using the McNemar test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results were stratified by TGCT type. FINDINGS: The study identified 4664 patients with TGCT, 284 with GCT-TS, and 4380 with PVNS. Mean age (GCT-TS group: 50 years; PVNS group: 51 years) and sex distributions (GCT-TS group: 60.2% female; PVNS group: 59.5% female) were similar for each group. Most patients with GCT-TS (78.2%) had at least one postindex surgery, compared with 38.7% of patients with PVNS. Mean total health care costs increased from $8943 in the preindex period to $14,880 in the postindex period (P < 0.001) for GCT-TS and from $13,221 in the preindex period to $17,728 in the postindex period (P < 0.001) for PVNS. Preindex to postindex ambulatory costs increased nearly 120% for patients with GCT-TS ($4340 to $9570, P < 0.001) and 50% for patients with PVNS ($6782 to $10,278, P < 0.001), and physical therapy use increased significantly during the same period (GCT-TS: 18% to 40%, P < 0.001; PVNS: 38% to 60%, P < 0.001). IMPLICATIONS: Costs increased substantially 1 year after the first TGCT claim, with more than half the costs covering ambulatory care. These results suggest a high health care burden once TGCT is identified.

One-year follow-up healthcare costs of patients hospitalized for transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke and discharged with aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole or clopidogrel.

OBJECTIVE: To examine healthcare costs among patients hospitalized for transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke (TIA/stroke) and prescribed aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole (ASA-ERDP) or clopidogrel (CLOPID) within 30 days post-discharge using a retrospective claims database from a large US managed care organization. METHODS: Adult patients with ≥1 hospitalizations for TIA/stroke between January 2007-July 2009 and ≥1 claims for an oral anti-platelet (OAP) were observed for 1 year before and after the first TIA/stroke hospitalization or until death, whichever came first. Cohorts were defined by the first claim for ASA-ERDP or CLOPID within 30 days post-discharge. A generalized linear model, adjusting for demographics, baseline comorbidities and costs, compared total follow-up costs (medical + pharmacy) between ASA-ERDP and CLOPID patients. RESULTS: Of 6377 patients (2085 ASA-ERDP; 4292 CLOPID) who met the selection criteria, mean (SD) age was 69 (13) years and 50% were male. Unadjusted mean total follow-up costs were lower for ASA-ERDP than CLOPID ($26,201 vs $30,349; p=0.002), of which average unadjusted medical and pharmacy costs were $22,094 vs $26,062 (p=0.003) and $4107 vs $4288 (p=0.119), respectively. Multivariate modeling indicated that the following were associated with higher total costs (all p<0.05): higher baseline Quan-Charlson comorbidity score, history of atrial fibrillation and myocardial infarction, index stroke hospitalization, death post-discharge, and index CLOPID use. Adjusted mean total follow-up costs for CLOPID were 9% higher than ASA-ERDP (cost ratio: 1.09; p=0.038). CONCLUSION: In this study, compared to CLOPID patients, ASA-ERDP patients were observed to have lower total costs 1 year post-discharge TIA/stroke hospitalization, driven primarily by lower medical costs. Further research into the real-world impact of OAP therapies on clinical and economic outcomes of patients with stroke/TIA is warranted. The findings of this study should be considered within the limitations of an administrative claims analysis, as claims data are collected for the purpose of payment.

Medicare payments, healthcare service use, and telemedicine implementation costs in a randomized trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care in medically underserved participants with diabetes mellitus (IDEATel).

Objective To determine whether a diabetes case management telemedicine intervention reduced healthcare expenditures, as measured by Medicare claims, and to assess the costs of developing and implementing the telemedicine intervention. Design We studied 1665 participants in the Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine (IDEATel), a randomized controlled trial comparing telemedicine case management of diabetes to usual care. Participants were aged 55 years or older, and resided in federally designated medically underserved areas of New York State. Measurements We analyzed Medicare claims payments for each participant for up to 60 study months from date of randomization, until their death, or until December 31, 2006 (whichever happened first). We also analyzed study expenditures for the telemedicine intervention over six budget years (February 28, 2000- February 27, 2006). Results Mean annual Medicare payments (SE) were similar in the usual care and telemedicine groups, $9040 ($386) and $9669 ($443) per participant, respectively (p>0.05). Sensitivity analyses, including stratification by censored status, adjustment by enrollment site, and semi-parametric weighting by probability of dropping-out, rendered similar results. Over six budget years 28 821 participant/months of telemedicine intervention were delivered, at an estimated cost of $622 per participant/month. Conclusion Telemedicine case management was not associated with a reduction in Medicare claims in this medically underserved population. The cost of implementing the telemedicine intervention was high, largely representing special purpose hardware and software costs required at the time. Lower implementation costs will need to be achieved using lower cost technology in order for telemedicine case management to be more widely used.