Hepatitis B Delta: assessment of the knowledge and practices of hepato-gastroenterologists practicing in non-academic settings in France.

BACKGROUND: Data on the management of Hepatitis B-Delta (HB-D) by hepatogastroenterologists (HGs) practicing in nonacademic hospitals or private practices are unknown in France. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the knowledge and practices of HGs practicing in nonacademic settings regarding HB-D. METHODS: A Google form document was sent to those HGs from May to September 2021. RESULTS: A total of 130 HGs (mean age, 45 years) have participated in this survey. Among HBsAg-positive patients, Delta infection was sought in only 89% of cases. Liver fibrosis was assessed using FibroScan in 77% of the cases and by liver biopsy in 81% of the cases. A treatment was proposed for patients with >F2 liver fibrosis in 49% of the cases regardless of transaminase levels and for all the patients by 39% of HGs. Responding HGs proposed a treatment using pegylated interferon in 50% of cases, bulevirtide in 45% of cases and a combination of pegylated interferon and bulevirtide in 40.5% of cases. Among the criteria to evaluate the treatment efficacy, a decrease or a normalization of transaminases was retained by 89% of responding HGs, a reduction of liver fibrosis score for 70% of them, an undetectable delta RNA and HBsAg for 55% of them and a 2 log 10 decline in delta viremia for 62% of the cases. CONCLUSION: Hepatitis Delta screening was not systematically performed in HBsAg-positive patients despite the probable awareness and knowledge of the few responders who were able to prescribe treatments of hepatitis delta.

A national French survey on the use of growth factors as adjuvant treatment of chronic hepatitis C.

UNLABELLED: We conducted a national retrospective survey on hospital practitioners to evaluate the magnitude of erythropoietin (EPO) or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prescriptions in patients treated for chronic hepatitis C. Four hundred seventy-one questionnaires were sent, and 274 practitioners (58.2%) responded. Forty-six percent of practitioners used EPO, and 31% used G-CSF. The total number of HCV-infected patients receiving antiviral therapy per year was estimated at 6,630 patients, of whom 8.8% and 4% received EPO and G-CSF, respectively. EPO-beta was the main EPO molecule prescribed at a median dose of 30,000 IU/wk (range: 2,000-80,000). The indications for prescribing EPO varied greatly, including "fragile patients" (34%), "low" Hb level (8-11 g/dL) (19%), "rapid decline" in Hb level (2-5 g/dL during the first month of therapy) (12%), and symptomatic anemic patients (7%). G-CSF was mainly prescribed for a "low" level of neutrophils ranging from 400 to 750 neutrophils/mm3. In multivariate analysis, independent predictors of EPO and G-CSF prescription were age of practitioner less than 45 years (EPO: OR = 1.96, P = 0.03; G-CSF: OR = 2.27, P = 0.004), practice in university hospital (EPO: OR = 5.89, P < 0.0001; G-CSF: OR = 2.39, P = 0.003), and the high number of CHC treated/year (EPO: OR = 6.18, P < 0.0001; G-CSF: OR = 2.58, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Our survey reveals an important rate of EPO and G-CSF prescriptions but with considerable disparity in the schedule of injections, the molecules used, and above all the indications. The suitable role of EPO and G-CSF as complements to HCV therapy urgently needs to be clarified.

[Seroprevalence of hepatitis A and cost evaluation of different vaccination strategies against hepatitis A virus in patients with chronic hepatitis C in France]. / Séroprévalence de l'infection par le virus de l'hépatite A et évaluation du coût direct de différentes stratégies vaccinales contre le virus de l'hépatite A chez les malades atteints d'hépatite chronique C en France.

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively determine the prevalence of total hepatitis virus A antibodies in patients with chronic hepatitis C and to evaluate the direct costs of several vaccination strategies against hepatitis A virus in these patients. METHODS: From April 1 to July the 31 1998, 219 patients with hepatitis C virus antibodies underwent a systematic testing for total hepatitis virus A antibodies (MEIA-AXSYM, Abbott laboratories). The prevalence of hepatitis A virus antibodies was evaluated according to age and suspected way of hepatitis C contamination. This prevalence has been compared to that in individuals undergoing a check-up provided by the national health insurance system stratified by age. Direct costs of 2 vaccination strategies "A" and "B" were evaluated according to age (<40 vs > 40 years) and number of vaccine doses (1 or 2). "A" strategy included the systematic vaccination of all patients without determining the presence of total hepatitis A antibodies. "B" strategy included testing for total hepatitis A antibodies and vaccination of seronegative patients. The costs of these two strategies (A and B) were calculated with one and two vaccine doses. RESULTS: The prevalence of total hepatitis A antibodies was 76% in the entire population. It increased after the age of 35 and was statistically higher in patients who were older than 40 than in patients younger than 40. This prevalence was not significantly different from that in individuals who underwent a check-up provided by the national health insurance system stratified according to age. "B" strategy with 2 vaccine doses was less expensive that A strategy in the whole population and in patients younger than 40. This strategy was less expensive with 1 vaccine dose except in patients who had recently screened positive for hepatitis C antibodies younger than 40 when it induced an increased in direct cost due to the low prevalence of total hepatitis A antibodies in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with hepatitis C antibodies with a high prevalence of total hepatitis A antibodies, testing for the prevalence of these antibodies before vaccination decreases the direct cost of this vaccination.