Impact of Surgeon Case Volume on Outcomes After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Despite a rapid increase in utilization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), volume-outcome studies focusing on surgeon volume are lacking. Surgeon-specific volume-outcome studies may inform policymakers and provide insight into learning curves and measures of efficiency with greater case volume. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study with longitudinal data included all rTSA cases as recorded in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Limited Data Set (2016 to 2018). The main effect was surgeon volume; this was categorized using two measures of surgeon volume: (1) rTSA case volume and (2) rTSA + TSA case volume. Volume cutoff values were calculated by applying a stratum-specific likelihood ratio analysis. RESULTS: Among 90,318 rTSA cases performed by 7,097 surgeons, we found a mean annual rTSA surgeon volume of 6 ± 10 and a mean rTSA + TSA volume of 9 ± 14. Regression models using surgeon-specific rTSA volume revealed that surgery from low (<29 cases) compared with medium (29 to 96 cases) rTSA-volume surgeons was associated with a significantly higher 90-day all-cause readmission (odds ratio [OR], 1.17; confidence interval [CI], 1.10 to 1.25; P < 0.0001), higher 90-day readmission rates because of an infection (OR, 1.46; CI, 1.16 to 1.83; P = 0.0013) or dislocation (OR, 1.43; CI, 1.19 to 1.72; P = 0.0001), increased 90-day postoperative cost (+11.3% CI, 4.2% to 19.0%; P = 0.0016), and a higher transfusion rate (OR, 2.06; CI, 1.70 to 2.50; P < 0.0001). Similar patterns existed when using categorizations based on rTSA + TSA case volume. CONCLUSION: Surgeon-specific volume-outcome relationships exist in this rTSA cohort, and we were able to identify thresholds that may identify low and medium/high volume surgeons. Observed volume-outcome relationships were independent of the definition of surgeon volume applied: either by focusing on the number of rTSAs performed per surgeon or anatomic TSAs performed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Second Harmonic Generation Microscopy as a Novel Intraoperative Assessment of Rat Median Nerve Injury.

PURPOSE: Nerves that are functionally injured but appear macroscopically intact pose the biggest clinical dilemma. Second Harmonic Generation (SHG) Microscopy may provide a real-time assessment of nerve damage, with the ultimate goal of allowing surgeons to accurately quantify the degree of nerve damage present. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the utility of SHG microscopy to detect nerve damage in vivo in an animal model. METHODS: Ten Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized and prepared for surgery. After surgical exposure and using a custom-made stretch applicator, the right median nerves were stretched by 20%, corresponding to a high strain injury, and held for 5 minutes. The left median nerve served as a sham control (SC), only being placed in the applicator for 5 minutes with no stretch. A nerve stimulator was used to assess the amount of stimulation required to induce a flicker and contraction of the paw. Nerves were then imaged using a multiphoton laser scanning microscope. RESULTS: Immediately after injury (day 0), SHG images of SC median nerves exhibited parallel collagen fibers with linear, organized alignment. In comparison with SC nerves, high strain nerves demonstrated artifacts indicative of nerve damage consisting of wavy, undulating fibers with crossing fibers and tears, as well as a decrease in the linear organization, which correlated with an increase in the mean stimulation required to induce a flicker and contraction of the paw. CONCLUSIONS: Second Harmonic Generation microscopy may provide the ability to detect an acute neural stretch injury in the rat median nerve. Epineurial collagen disorganization correlated with the stimulation required for nerve function. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In the future, SHG may provide the ability to visualize nerve damage intraoperatively, allowing for better clinical decision-making. However, this is currently a research tool and requires further validation before translating to the clinical setting.

Shoulder injuries in ice hockey players: Prevalence, common management, and return to play.

Background: The sport of ice hockey has reached worldwide popularity, and it continues to grow. With this growth, however, there has also been an increase in the number of injuries related to the high-speed physical nature of the sport. Upper extremity related traumas and maladies are amongst the most commonly experienced injuries in this population of athletes. The objective of this narrative review is to appraise the current literary landscape as to the epidemiology, treatment, and return to play experienced with the most common upper extremity orthopedic injuries related to ice hockey play. Methods: PubMed, Google Scholar, and OVID were searched individually using the filtered terms "shoulder", "injury", and "ice hockey". Articles that were published after 2000 were analyzed. Notably, the concepts of athlete sex, compete level, and post injury productivity were explored in detail. Results: It is evident in the literature that upper extremity injury rates increased as level of play increased, were more common in males, and occurred more often during in-game situations. Acromioclavicular joint separations, shoulder instability, and clavicle fractures were amongst the most commonly cited ice hockey upper extremity injury presentations; acromioclavicular joint injuries were considered the most common upper extremity injury in ice hockey players. Return to play depends on injury type and severity. Overall, performance decreased upon initial return from injury. Conclusion: Ultimately, further research needs to be conducted on shoulder related ice hockey injuries, their prevention, and the accurate management of specific presentations in order to ensure efficient and safe return to play.

An Assessment of Upper-Extremity Surgical Technique Videos and Their Relationship With Procedural Learning Theory.

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to ascertain how well award-winning and highly viewed upper-extremity surgical videos meet the needs of users and adhere to procedural learning theory. We hypothesized that upper-extremity videos hosted on academic society websites meet user needs better than upper-extremity videos hosted on a commercial website. METHODS: Twenty-five upper-extremity videos were evaluated by 3 reviewers. A standardized scoring sheet was used to assess each video's content, production quality, and adequacy. Video lengths were compared. The inclusion frequencies of specific content categories, the adequacy of content, and meeting certain production standards, all of which assess consistency with procedural learning theory, were reported, stratified by video host. Associations between the video host and video content, production quality, and adequacy were assessed. RESULTS: The median lengths of academically hosted and commercially hosted videos were similar. Regardless of the video host, no video contained information in all content categories. Sixty percent of the scored categories were present in less than 75% of evaluated videos. Academically hosted videos contained scored content more frequently than commercially hosted videos in 68.4% of categories. There were significant associations between academic hosts and inclusion of a case presentation, surgical indications, outcomes literature, a preoperative examination, follow-up visit intervals, and alternative surgical techniques. Overall, academically hosted videos had a higher percentage of adequate content categories compared with commercially hosted videos. CONCLUSIONS: Videos on academic websites more consistently meet users' content needs and production expectations, as informed by procedural learning theory, while having higher rates of adequate content compared with videos on commercial websites. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: While academically hosted videos appear to more consistently adhere to the tenets of procedural learning theory, opportunity exists for video creators to more consistently apply procedural learning theory, allowing for the creation of even more educationally beneficial online surgical videos.

Impact of Increasing Comorbidity Burden on Resource Utilization in Patients With Proximal Humerus Fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Proximal humerus fractures (PHF) are a common upper extremity fracture in the elderly cohort. An aging and more comorbid cohort, along with recent trends of increased operative intervention, suggests that there could be an increase in resource utilization caring for these patients. We sought to quantify these trends and quantify the impact that comorbidity burden has on resource utilization. METHODS: Data on 83,975 patients with PHFs were included from the Premier Healthcare Claims database (2006 to 2016) and stratified by Deyo-Charlson index. Multivariable models assessed associations between Deyo-Charlson comorbidities and resource utilization (length and cost of hospitalization, and opioid utilization in oral morphine equivalents [OME]) for five treatment modalities: (1) open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), (2) closed reduction internal fixation (CRIF), (3) hemiarthroplasty, (4) reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, and (5) nonsurgical treatment (NST). We report a percentage change in resource utilization associated with an increasing comorbidity burden. RESULTS: Overall distribution of treatment modalities was (proportion in percent/median length of stay/cost/opioid utilization): ORIF (19.1%/2 days/$11,183/210 OME), CRIF (1.1%/4 days/$11,139/220 OME), hemiarthroplasty (10.7%/3 days/$17,255/275 OME), reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (6.4%/3 days/$21,486/230 OME), and NST (62.7%/0 days/$1,269/30 OME). Patients with an increased comorbidity burden showed a pattern of (1) more pronounced relative increases in length of stay among those treated operatively (65.0% for patients with a Deyo-Charlson index >2), whereas (2) increases in cost of hospitalization (60.1%) and opioid utilization (37.0%) were more pronounced in the NST group. DISCUSSION: In patients with PHFs, increased comorbidity burden coincides with substantial increases in resource utilization in patients receiving surgical and NSTs. Combined with known increases in operative intervention, trends in increased comorbidity burden may have profound effects on the cohort level and resource utilization for those with PHFs, especially because the use of bundled payment strategies for fractures increases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Effect of Time of Operation on Hip Fracture Outcomes: A Retrospective Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Hip fractures are a common source of morbidity, mortality, and cost burden for elderly patients. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with hip fracture treated during the day or night at a rural level I academic trauma center and compared the postoperative outcomes and resource utilization for both groups. METHODS: Patients aged ≥55 years with hip fractures treated with definitive surgical fixation from April 2011 to April 2013 were included in this study. Patients who underwent surgery between 7 AM and 5 PM were included in the day cohort, while those who underwent surgery between 5 PM and 7 AM were included in the night cohort. A total of 441 patients met the study inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Comparison of the baseline characteristics of the two cohorts did not demonstrate significant variance. Although postoperative outcomes and resource utilization trends varied between the day and night cohort, only in-hospital cost was significantly higher in the day cohort (P = 0.04). Postoperative variables, including blood loss, [INCREMENT]hematocrit level, length of surgery, length of stay, time to surgery, in-hospital mortality, and 30-day readmission, did not vary significantly. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates a significantly higher cost associated with hip fracture procedures performed between 7 AM and 5 PM. In addition, perioperative blood loss and length of surgery were used as markers of physician fatigue; however, no statistically significant difference among these variables was found between hip fracture intervention performed during the day versus at night. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective observational study.

An outcomes protocol for carpal tunnel release: a comparison of outcomes in patients with and without medical comorbidities.

PURPOSE: To prospectively report the outcomes of open carpal tunnel release with respect to patient age and medical comorbidities. METHODS: Nine hundred fifty open carpal tunnel procedures in 826 patients (age range, 21-100 y) at a high-volume orthopedic surgery center were evaluated. Self-reported symptom severity and functional scores were collected using the validated Boston Carpal Tunnel Outcomes questionnaire preoperatively, and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: Patients demonstrated a significant improvement in symptom severity scores at 2 weeks and functional severity scores at 6 weeks. Documented patient medical comorbidities did not affect improvement after surgery. Patients with diabetes improved more slowly but were not significantly different at 6 weeks. Patients with workers' compensation insurance were significantly worse at baseline, 2 weeks, and 6 weeks but were not significantly different at 3 months. The risk of negative postoperative endpoints was slightly higher in patients with a medical comorbidity, though not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvements in symptom severity and hand function may be expected after open carpal tunnel release in the general population regardless of age, medical comorbidities, or workers' compensation status. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic III.