Validation of a new prognostic index for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

BACKGROUND: The clinical course of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is highly variable. A prognostic index based on widely available clinical and laboratory features was recently developed to predict survival among patients with previously untreated CLL. This index requires validation in an independent series of patients before widespread use can be recommended. METHODS: The Mayo Clinic CLL database was used to evaluate the validity and reproducibility of the new prognostic index. RESULTS: A total of 440 patients with newly diagnosed CLL who were seen at the Mayo Clinic within 12 months of diagnosis and for whom data were available with which to calculate index score were identified. Patients were classified as low, intermediate, or high risk using the prognostic index. The estimated median survival times were: not reached for low risk, 10.1 years for intermediate risk, and 7.2 years for high risk. The estimated median and 5-year survival by prognostic index risk category were similar to those originally reported. The prognostic index risk category added predictive value beyond that of Rai risk alone (P=.004). The prognostic index risk category remained a predictor of survival when analysis was limited to Rai stage 0 (P=.03) and nonreferred patients (P<.0001) and also predicted time to treatment (P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study confirm the ability of a newly developed prognostic index to predict survival among patients with previously untreated CLL. The study also extended the utility of the index by demonstrating that it is useful at diagnosis, retains prognostic value when applied exclusively to Rai stage 0 patients, is effective in nonreferred patients, and predicts time to treatment.

Quality of life in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: an international survey of 1482 patients.

Although a diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) can have a profound effect on the quality of life (QOL), few studies have objectively measured the QOL of CLL patients or compared it to the general population. We conducted an international, web-based survey of patients with CLL using standardized instruments with published population norms to evaluate fatigue and QOL. Co-morbid health conditions were assessed using the Charlson Co-Morbidity Index. Between June and October 2006, 1482 patients with CLL responded to the survey. The physical, social/family, functional, and overall QOL scores of CLL patients were similar to or better than published population norms. In contrast, the emotional well-being scores of CLL patients were dramatically lower than that of both the general population (P < 0.001) and patients with other types of cancer (P < 0.001). QOL scores were lower among individuals with advanced stage disease (all P < 0.05). Factors associated with lower overall QOL on multivariate analysis included older age, greater fatigue, severity of co-morbid health conditions, and current treatment. CLL has a profound impact on QOL at all disease stages. The effects of CLL on QOL appear to differ from that of other malignancies with a more marked impact on emotional QOL. Research identifying efficacious psycho-oncologic support interventions for patients with CLL is needed.

Update on risk-stratified management for chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Major recent advances in understanding the biology of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL) have improved clinical evaluation and influenced treatment decisions. CLL can be diagnosed early and accurately, and biological measurements can be used to predict a prognosis at diagnosis. Individual patient care can be risk stratified to optimize benefit and minimize complications of therapy. Purine analogs and monoclonal antibodies have markedly improved the efficacy of initial therapy but are not curative. The treatment of relapsed and refractory CLL is less successful. However, recent developments suggest that allogeneic stem cell transplant could have a larger role in a selected group of these patients. Potential new treatment modalities include targeted molecules that interrupt key components of CLL cell survival pathways, and active and passive immunotherapy. The management of CLL is in a dynamic phase of rapid evolution. Risk stratification using biological prognostic markers can improve current patient care and direct future clinical research.