Virtual biomechanical assessment of porous tantalum and custom triflange components in the treatment of patients with acetabular defects and pelvic discontinuity.

Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical models of two frequently used techniques for reconstructing severe acetabular defects with pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) - the Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System (TMARS) and custom triflange acetabular components (CTACs) - using virtual modelling. Methods: Pre- and postoperative CT scans from ten patients who underwent revision with the TMARS for a Paprosky IIIB acetabular defect with pelvic discontinuity were retrospectively collated. Computer models of a CTAC implant were designed from the preoperative CT scans of these patients. Computer models of the TMARS reconstruction were segmented from postoperative CT scans using a semi-automated method. The amount of bone removed, the implant-bone apposition that was achieved, and the restoration of the centre of rotation of the hip were compared between all the actual TMARS and the virtual CTAC implants. Results: The median amount of bone removed for TMARS reconstructions was significantly greater than for CTAC implants (9.07 cm3 (interquartile range (IQR) 5.86 to 21.42) vs 1.16 cm3 (IQR 0.42 to 3.53) (p = 0.004). There was no significant difference between the median overall implant-bone apposition between TMARS reconstructions and CTAC implants (54.8 cm2 (IQR 28.2 to 82.3) vs 56.6 cm2 (IQR 40.6 to 69.7) (p = 0.683). However, there was significantly more implant-bone apposition within the residual acetabulum (45.2 cm2 (IQR 28.2 to 72.4) vs 25.5 cm2 (IQR 12.8 to 44.1) (p = 0.001) and conversely significantly less apposition with the outer cortex of the pelvis for TMARS implants compared with CTAC reconstructions (0 cm2 (IQR 0 to 13.1) vs 23.2 cm2 (IQR 16.4 to 30.6) (p = 0.009). The mean centre of rotation of the hip of TMARS reconstructions differed by a mean of 11.1 mm (3 to 28) compared with CTAC implants. Conclusion: In using TMARS, more bone is removed, thus achieving more implant-bone apposition within the residual acetabular bone. In CTAC implants, the amount of bone removed is minimal, while the implant-bone apposition is more evenly distributed between the residual acetabulum and the outer cortex of the pelvis. The differences suggest that these implants used to treat pelvic discontinuity might achieve short- and long-term stability through different biomechanical mechanisms.

Ex vivo assessment of surgically repaired tibial plateau fracture displacement under axial load using large-volume micro-CT.

Postoperative weight bearing has the potential to generate fragmental motion of surgically repaired tibial plateau fractures (TPFs), which may contribute to loss of fracture reduction. The effect of loading on the internal distribution of fragmentary displacements is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the internal displacements of surgically repaired split TPFs due to a three-bodyweight load, using large-volume micro-CT imaging and image correlation. Fractures were generated and surgically repaired for two cadaveric specimens. Load was applied to the specimens inside a large-volume micro-CT system and scanned at 0.046 mm isotropic voxel size. Pre- and post-loading images were paired, co-registered, and internal fragmentary displacements quantified. Internal fragmental displacements of the cadaveric bones were compared to in vivo displacements measured in the lateral split fragments of TPFs in a clinical cohort of patients who had similar surgical repair and were prescribed pain tolerated postoperative weight bearing. The split fragments of cadaveric specimens displaced, on average, less than 0.3 mm, consistent with in vivo measurements. Specimen one rotated around the mediolateral axis, while specimen two displaced consistently caudally. Specimen two also had varying displacements along the mediolateral axis where, at the fracture site, the fragment displaced caudally and laterally, while the most lateral edge of the tibial plateau displaced caudally and medially. The methods applied in this study can be used to measure internal fragmental motion within TPFs.

Radiostereometric Analysis Allows Assessment of the Stability and Inducible Displacement of Pelvic Ring Disruptions during Healing: A Case Series.

There is currently no accurate data on fracture displacement during the rehabilitation of pelvic ring injuries. This study investigated the use of radiostereometric analysis (RSA) in assessing the stability of C1 pelvic ring injuries stabilised with a posterior plate and an anterior external fixator. Six patients, instructed to weight-bear as tolerated after surgery, were reviewed at 2, 4, 6, 12, 26, 52 and 104 weeks. The external fixators were removed at 6 weeks. Outcomes, including the Iowa Pelvic Score (IPS), and complications were recorded. Fracture stability was assessed using measurements on plain radiographs and RSA. All patients progressed to full weight-bearing without support within 6 weeks. At 104 weeks, the IPS was excellent in four patients, good in one patient and fair in one patient. Plain radiographs showed that all fractures were well reduced, and no loss of reduction occurred over time. By contrast, RSA measurements identified displacement in all cases. The maximum three-dimensional (3D) displacement at any time point in each patient ranged from 2 to 10 mm. Two patients with the largest displacement over time had the lowest IPS. RSA also demonstrated displacements above the currently defined normal threshold through the 'un-injured' sacroiliac joint in the same two patients, suggesting a subtle C2 injury, missed at initial assessment. This study demonstrates the limitations of plain radiographs in assessing pelvic fracture stability and displacement during healing, and the potential of RSA to monitor more accurately the effects of stabilisation and weight-bearing on fracture stability.