The anatomical positioning change of retroperitoneal organs in prone and lateral position: an assessment for single-prone position lateral lumbar surgery.

PURPOSE: There are reports that performing lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in a prone, single position (single-prone LLIF) can be done safely in the prone position because the retroperitoneal organs reflect anteriorly with gravity. However, only a few study has investigated the safety of single-prone LLIF and retroperitoneal organ positioning in the prone position. We aimed to investigate the positioning of retroperitoneal organs in the prone position and evaluate the safety of single-prone LLIF surgery. METHODS: A total of 94 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The anatomical positioning of the retroperitoneal organs was evaluated by CT in the preoperative supine and intraoperative prone position. The distances from the centre line of the intervertebral body to the organs including aorta, inferior vena cava, ascending and descending colons, and bilateral kidneys were measured for the lumbar spine. An "at risk" zone was defined as distance less than 10 mm anterior from the centre line of the intervertebral body. RESULTS: Compared to supine preoperative CTs, bilateral kidneys at the L2/3 level as well as the bilateral colons at the L3/4 level had statistically significant ventral shift with prone positioning. The proportion of retroperitoneal organs within the at-risk zone ranged from 29.6 to 88.6% in the prone position. CONCLUSIONS: The retroperitoneal organs shifted ventrally with prone positioning. However, the amount of shift was not large enough to avoid risk for organ injuries and substantial proportion of patients had organs within the cage insertion corridor. Careful preoperative planning is warranted when considering single-prone LLIF.

Dermal ultrasound measurements for bone quality assessment : An investigation of advanced glycation endproducts derived from confocal fluorescence microscopy.

Bone quality is increasingly being recognized in the assessment of fracture risk. Nonenzymatic collagen cross-linking with the accumulation of advanced glycation end products stiffens and embrittles collagen fibers thus increasing bone fragility. Echogenicity is an ultrasound (US) parameter that provides information regarding the skin collagen structure. We hypothesized that both skin and bone collagen degrade in parallel fashion. Prospectively collected data of 110 patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion was analyzed. Preoperative skin US measurements were performed in the lumbar region to assess dermal thickness and echogenicity. Intraoperative bone biopsies from the posterior superior iliac spine were obtained and analyzed with confocal fluorescence microscopy for fluorescent advanced glycation endproducts (fAGEs). Pearson's correlation was calculated to examine relationships between  (1) US and fAGEs, and (2) age and fAGEs stratified by sex. Multivariable linear regression analysis with adjustments for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was used to investigate associations between US and fAGEs. One hundred and ten patients (51.9% female, 61.6 years, BMI 29.8 kg/m2 ) were included in the analysis. In the univariate analysis cortical and trabecular fAGEs decreased with age, but only in women (cortical: r = -0.32, p = 0.031; trabecular: r = -0.32; p = 0.031). After adjusting for age, sex, BMI, diabetes mellitus, and HbA1c, lower dermal (ß = 1.01; p = 0.012) and subcutaneous (ß = 1.01; p = 0.021) echogenicity increased with increasing cortical fAGEs and lower dermal echogenicity increased with increasing trabecular fAGEs (ß = 1.01; p = 0.021). This is the first study demonstrating significant associations between skin US measurements and in vivo bone quality parameters in lumbar fusion patients. As a noninvasive assessment tool, skin US measurements might be incorporated into future practice to investigate bone quality in spine surgery patients.

Quantitative CT for Preoperative Assessment of Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: The Unique Impact of L4 Bone Mineral Density on Single-Level Disease.

Background: Quantitative computed tomography (qCT) efficiently measures 3-dimensional vertebral bone mineral density (BMD), but its utility in measuring BMD at various vertebral levels in patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) is unclear. Purpose: We sought to determine whether qCT could differentiate BMD at different levels of LDS, particularly at L4-L5, the most common single level for LDS. In addition, we sought to describe patterns of BMD for single-level and multiple-level LDS. Methods: We conducted a study of patients undergoing surgery for LDS who were part of a larger longitudinal study comparing preoperative and intraoperative images. Preoperative patients were grouped as single-level or multiple-level LDS, and qCT BMD was obtained for L1-S1 vertebrae. Mean BMD was compared with literature reports; in multivariable analyses, BMD of each vertebra was assessed according to the level of LDS, controlling for covariates and for BMD of other vertebrae. Results: Of 250 patients (mean age: 67 years, 64% women), 22 had LDS at L3-L4 only, 170 at L4-L5 only, 13 at L5-S1 only, and 45 at multiple levels. Compared with other disorders reported in the literature, BMD in our sample similarly decreased from L1 to L3 then increased from L4 to S1, but mean BMD per vertebra in our sample was lower. Nearly half of our sample met criteria for osteopenia. In multivariable analysis controlling for BMD at other vertebrae, lower L4 BMD was associated with LDS at L4-L5, greater pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis, and not having diabetes. In contrast, in similar multivariable analysis, greater L4 BMD was associated with LDS at L3-L4. Bone mineral density of L3 and L5 was not associated with LDS levels. Conclusion: In our sample of preoperative patients with LDS, we observed lower BMD for LDS than for other lumbar disorders. L4 BMD varied according to the level of LDS after controlling for covariates and BMD of other vertebrae. Given that BMD can be obtained from routine imaging, our findings suggest that qCT data may be useful in the comprehensive assessment of and strategy for LDS surgery. More research is needed to elucidate the cause-effect relationships among spinopelvic alignment, LDS, and BMD.

Fusion assessment in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: 3D-printed titanium versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages.

Background: Compare fusion at two independent timepoints (early and late) between 3D-printed titanium (Ti) and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in patients undergoing standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (SA-LLIF). We hypothesized that 3D-printed Ti cages show higher fusion rates at an early timepoint compared to PEEK. Methods: A retrospective study of patients undergoing SA-LLIF with 3D-printed Ti cages and PEEK cages between 11/2016 and 01/2020 at a single academic institution was done. Fusion was assessed for each treated level using multiplanar reconstructed computed tomography (CT) scans. Presence of fully bridged interbody trabecular bone or continuous bone centered in the cage was considered as fusion. Results: In total, 91 patients (136 levels) were included in the final analysis, 49 patients (72 levels) in the early group and 42 patients (64 levels) in the late group. CT scans were performed on average 8.2±1.8 months postoperatively for the early group and 18.9±7.7 months for the late group. In the early group, fusion was significantly higher for 3D-printed Ti cages compared to PEEK cages (95.8% versus 62.5%; P=0.002), whereas in the late group no significant difference was seen (94.7% versus 80.0%; P=0.258). Conclusions: In SA-LLIF, porous 3D-printed Ti cages showed significantly higher fusion rates at an early timepoint compared to PEEK. However, the difference in fusion rates between 3D-printed Ti cages and PEEK cages was found not to be significantly different at a later timepoint in another patient group. This might support the assumption that 3D-printed Ti cages with a porous architecture are more osteoconductive compared to PEEK and tend to fuse earlier.

The predictive value of a novel site-specific MRI-based bone quality assessment, endplate bone quality (EBQ), for severe cage subsidence among patients undergoing standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Studies have shown that site-specific bone density measurements had more predictive value for complications than standard whole-region measurements. Recently, MRI-based assessments of vertebral bone quality (VBQ) were introduced. However, there have been few studies that investigate the association between site-specific MRI bone assessment and osteoporosis-related complications in patients undergoing lumbar interbody fusion. In this work, we created a novel site-specific MRI-based assessment of the endplate bone quality (EBQ) and assessed its predictive value for severe cage subsidence following standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (SA-LLIF). PURPOSE: To investigate the predictive value of a novel MRI-based bone assessment for severe cage subsidence after SA-LLIF. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent SA-LLIF from 2008 to 2019 at a single, academic institution with available preoperative lumbar CT and T1-weighted MRIs. OUTCOME MEASURES: Association between EBQ and severe subsidence after SA-LLIF. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of SA-LLIF patients treated between 2008 and 2019. EBQ was measured using preoperative non-contrast T1-weighted MRIs of the lumbar spine. EBQ was defined as the average value of signal intensity of both endplates divided by that of the cerebrospinal fluid space at the level of L3. Bivariate and multivariable analyses with generalized linear mixed models were performed and set binary severe subsidence as the outcome. RESULTS: Two hundred five levels in 89 patients were included. Fifty levels (24.4%) demonstrated severe subsidence. Bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography was significantly lower in the subsidence group. Both VBQ and EBQ were significantly higher in the subsidence group. The EBQ plus Modic change (MC) model demonstrated that the effect of EBQ was independent of MC. In multivariate analyses adjusted with QCT-vBMD, EBQ showed a significant association with cage subsidence whereas VBQ only showed a marginal trend. The EBQ-based prediction model for severe subsidence showed better goodness of fit compared to the VBQ-based model. CONCLUSIONS: High EBQ was an independent factor for severe cage subsidence after SA-LLIF and the EBQ-based model showed better goodness of fit compared to VBQ- or MC-based models. EBQ assessment before SA-LLIF may provide insight into a patient's risk for severe subsidence.

Preoperative MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score assessment in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The importance of bone status assessment in spine surgery is well recognized. The current gold standard for assessing bone mineral density is dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). However, DEXA has been shown to overestimate BMD in patients with spinal degenerative disease and obesity. Consequently, alternative radiographic measurements using data routinely gathered during preoperative evaluation have been explored for the evaluation of bone quality and fracture risk. Opportunistic quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and more recently, the MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score, have both been shown to correlate with DEXA T-scores and predict osteoporotic fractures. However, to date the direct association between VBQ and QCT has not been studied. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between VBQ and spine QCT BMD measurements and assess whether the recently described novel VBQ score can predict the presence of osteopenia/osteoporosis diagnosed with QCT. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Cross-sectional study using retrospectively collected data. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients undergoing lumbar fusion from 2014-2019 at a single, academic institution with available preoperative lumbar CT and T1-weighted MRIs were included. OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlation of the VBQ score with BMD measured by QCT, and association between VBQ score and presence of osteopenia/osteoporosis. METHODS: Asynchronous QCT measurements were performed. The average L1-L2 BMD was calculated and patients were categorized as either normal BMD (>120 mg/cm3) or osteopenic/osteoporotic (≤120 mg/cm3). The VBQ score was calculated by dividing the median signal intensity of the L1-L4 vertebral bodies by the signal intensity of the cerebrospinal fluid on midsagittal T1-weighted MRI images. Inter-observer reliability testing of the VBQ measurements was performed. Demographic data and the VBQ score were compared between the normal and osteopenic/osteoporotic group. To determine the area-under-curve (AUC) of the VBQ score as a predictor of osteopenia/osteoporosis receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed. VBQ scores were compared with QCT BMD using the Pearson's correlation. RESULTS: A total of 198 patients (53% female) were included. The mean age was 62 years and the mean BMI was 28.2 kg/m2. The inter-observer reliability of the VBQ measurements was excellent (ICC of 0.90). When comparing the patients with normal QCT BMD to those with osteopenia/osteoporosis, the patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis were significantly older (64.9 vs. 56.7 years, p<.0001). The osteopenic/osteoporotic group had significantly higher VBQ scores (2.6 vs. 2.2, p<.0001). The VBQ score showed a statistically significant negative correlation with QCT BMD (correlation coefficient = -0.358, 95% CI -0.473 - -0.23, p<.001). Using a VBQ score cutoff value of 2.388, the categorical VBQ score yielded a sensitivity of 74.3% and a specificity of 57.0% with an AUC of 0.7079 to differentiate patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis and with normal BMD. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the VBQ score showed moderate diagnostic ability to differentiate patients with normal BMD versus osteopenic/osteoporotic BMD based on QCT. VBQ may be an interesting adjunct to clinically performed bone density measurements in the future.

Workers' Compensation Status in Association with a High NDI Score Negatively Impacts Post-Operative Dysphagia and Dysphonia Following Anterior Cervical Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a safe and effective procedure but has approach-related complications like postoperative dysphagia and dysphonia (PDD). Patient-reported outcome measures including the Hospital for Special Surgery Dysphagia and Dysphonia Inventory (HSS-DDI) have been used for the assessment of PDD. Various factors have been described that affect ACDF outcomes, and our aim was to investigate the effect of workers' compensation (WC) status. METHODS: We included patients who underwent ACDF from 2015 to 2018 stratified according to insurance status: WC/non-WC. PDDs were assessed using the HSS-DDI score. We conducted logistic regression analyses. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: We included 287 patients, 44 (15.33%) WC and 243 (84.67%) non-WC. A statistical comparison revealed a clinically relevant difference in the HSS-DDI total score and both subdomains (P = 0.015; dysphagia P = 0.021; dysphonia P = 0.002). Additional logistic regression analysis adjusting for preoperative Neck Disability Index scores resulted in no clinically relevant differences in the HSS-DDI total score and both subdomains (total score P = 0.420; dysphagia P = 0.531; dysphonia 0.315). CONCLUSIONS: WC status was associated with a worse HSS-DDI score but could not be shown to be an independent risk factor for PDD. The preoperative NDI score was a strong predictor for PDD with a clinically relevant difference in the HSS DDI score (P < 0.0001). Surgeon awareness of risk factors for PDD such as WC status, even if it could not be shown as independent, is important as it may influence surgical decision making and managing patient expectations.

C2 Pedicle Sclerosis Grading, More Than Diameter, Predicts Surgeons' Preoperative Assessment of Safe Screw Placement: A Novel Classification System.

BACKGROUND: The preoperative assessment of C2 morphology is important for safe instrumentation. Sclerotic changes are often seen in C2 pedicles. Evaluating the diameter measurements solely might not accurately assess the safety of screw insertion. We have proposed a novel grading system of the C2 pedicle that includes sclerosis and evaluated the predictive value of this grading system with the surgeon's safety evaluation. METHODS: We reviewed and measured the dimensional values in 220 cervical computed tomography angiograms. Additionally, we used a grading system that divides the findings into 5 grades according to the width measurement and degree of sclerosis in the C2 pedicle. Two spine surgeons independently classified the pedicles as follows: safe (minimal risk of pedicle violation), caution needed (caution to minimize pedicle violation), or dangerous (a high risk of pedicle violation). Finally, we compared the measurements and the surgeons' safety assessments. RESULTS: A total of 411 pedicles of 203 patients (mean age, 69.5 years; 49.5% women) were included. Of the 411 C2 pedicles, 170 were classified as high risk by ≥1 surgeon. Between the dimensional measurements and grading system, the sclerotic grade showed the best predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: We have introduced a novel tool to evaluate the safety of C2 pedicle screw placement. Our results suggest that our pedicle width-sclerosis grading system is reproducible and predicts the surgeon's assessment of safe screw placement better than C2 pedicle diametrical measurements alone.

Qualitative assessment of patients' perspectives and willingness to improve healthy lifestyle physical activity after lumbar surgery.

PURPOSE: Many patients retain sedentary lifestyles after lumbar surgery and incur increased risks of adverse health outcomes. The goal of this study was to assess patients' perspectives about postoperative physical activity. METHODS: During routine post-lumbar surgery visits in a tertiary care center, 260 patients were asked open-ended questions about their spine and physical activity. Three investigators reviewed responses and determined themed categories. Patients also completed surveys measuring disability, depressive symptoms, anxiety, and fear-avoidance of physical activity. Surgical complexity was assigned based on operative features. RESULTS: Mean age was 63, and 53% were men. Thirty-nine percent thought walking was good for the spine, particularly among those with less fear-avoidance, less disability, and less complex surgery. Spine benefits were cited (42%) for the short-term ("faster recovery") and long-term ("decreases chances of another surgery"), particularly by younger patients. To increase activity, patients suggested spine-specific techniques (35%, "use railings") and advised caution (24%, "pace yourself"). The major deterrent was persistent back pain (36%) particularly for those with worse disability, and more depressive symptoms, anxiety, complex surgery, and fear-avoidance. Our findings consistently fit with the Social Cognitive Theory of health behavior which posits a dynamic three-way interaction of personal factors, environmental influences, and behavior. CONCLUSIONS: Patients acknowledge short- and long-term benefits of physical activity for their spine and overall health; however, many are deterred from increasing activity by spine-related concerns. Interventions to improve physical activity should foster self-efficacy and self-direction and should be reinforced by members of the spine care team who are knowledgeable about prudent activities.

Interlaminar stabilization for spinal stenosis in the Medicare population.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The number of complex fusions performed on Medicare beneficiaries, defined as ≥age 65, with lumbar spinal stenosis with or without spondylolisthesis has been increasing. Typically, these procedures are longer, more invasive and pose a greater risk for complications. Interlaminar stabilization (ILS) serves as an intermediary between decompression alone and decompression with fusion. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to prospectively examine the efficacy of ILS in patients ≥age 65 through comparison to fusion in the same age group and ILS in younger patients. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A prospective, multicentered, randomized controlled trial comparing decompression with ILS to decompression with posterolateral fusion with bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients from 21 sites in the United States underwent surgery for moderate stenosis with up to a grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis and failure of conservative treatment with low back pain at 1 or 2 contiguous levels from L1-L5. Preoperatively, patient-reported assessment had to meet the criteria of significant pain and disability (Visual Analog Scale [VAS back pain] ≥50 mm on a 100 mm scale; Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] of ≥20/50). OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was overall Composite Clinical Success (CCS) as determined by ODI scores, incidence of postoperative epidural injections and/or reoperations, incidence of device-related complications, and persistent or progressive neurological deficit. Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction as measured by VAS for back and worse leg pain and Zurich Claudication Questionnaire scores. Narcotic usage data and radiographic assessment of changes in postoperative posterior disc height and foraminal height were also evaluated. METHODS: At 1- or 2-levels, 84 patients ≥age 65 underwent decompression with ILS, 57 patients ≥age 65 underwent decompression with fusion, and 131 patients

Patient Factors Affecting Emergency Department Utilization and Hospital Readmission Rates After Primary Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Review of 41,813 cases.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. OBJECTIVE: To identify preoperative risk factors for emergency department (ED) visit and unplanned hospital readmission after primary anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) at 30 and 90 days. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Limited data exist to identify factors associated with ED visit or readmission after primary ACDF within the first 3 months following surgery. METHODS: Patients undergoing ACDF from 2005 to 2012 were identified in the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database. Multivariable regression models were created based on patient-level and surgical characteristics to identify independent risk factors for hospital revisit. RESULTS: Of 41,813 patients identified, 2514 (6.0%) returned to the ED within 30 days of discharge. Risk factors included age < 35, black race (OR 1.19), Charlson Comorbidity index score > 1, length of stay (LOS) greater than 1 day (OR 1.23), and fusion of > 2 levels (OR 1.17). Four thousand six hundred nine (11.0%) patients returned to the ED within 90 days. Risk factors mirrored those at 30 days. Patients having private insurance or those discharged to rehab were less likely to present to the ED. One thousand three hundred ninety-four (3.3%) patients were readmitted by 30 days. Risk factors included male sex, Medicare, or Medicaid insurance (OR 1.71 and 1.79 respectively), Charlson comorbidity index > 1, discharge to a skilled nursing facility (OR 2.90), infectious/pathologic (OR 3.296), or traumatic (OR 1.409) surgical indication, LOS > 1 day (OR 1.66), or in-hospital complication. 2223 (5.3%) patients were readmitted by 90 days. Risk factors mirrored those at 30 days. No differences in readmission were seen based on race or number of levels fused. Patients aged 18 to 34 were less likely to be readmitted versus patients older than 35. CONCLUSION: Insurance status, comorbidities, and LOS consistently predicted an unplanned hospital visit at 30 and 90 days. Although nondegenerative surgical indications and in-hospital complications did not predict ED visits, these factors increased the risk for readmission. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Does the Addition of Either a Lateral or Posterior Interbody Device to Posterior Instrumented Lumbar Fusion Decrease Cost Over a 6-Year Period?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. OBJECTIVES: Few studies have compared the costs of single-level (1) posterior instrumented fusion alone (PSF), (2) posterior interbody fusion with PSF (PLIF), and (3) lateral interbody fusion with PSF (circumferential LLIF). The purpose of this study was to compare costs associated with these procedures. METHODS: Charts were reviewed and patients followed-up with a telephone questionnaire. Medicare reimbursement data was used for cost estimation from the payer's perspective. Multivariate survival analysis was performed to assess time to elevated resource use (greater than 90% of study patients or $68 672). RESULTS: A total of 337 patients (PSF, 45; PLIF, 222; circumferential LLIF, 70) were included (63% follow-up at 6 years). PSF and circumferential LLIF patients were 3 times more likely to reach the cutoff value compared with PLIF patients (P = .017). CONCLUSIONS: Circumferential LLIF and PSF patients were more likely to have higher resource use than PLIF patients and thus incur greater costs at 6-year follow-up.

Biomechanical and histologic assessment of a novel screw retention technology in an ovine lumbar fusion model.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Screw loosening is a prevalent failure mode in orthopedic hardware, particularly in osteoporotic bone or revision procedures where the screw-bone engagement is limited. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a novel screw retention technology (SRT) in an ovine lumbar fusion model. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This was a biomechanical, radiographic, and histologic study utilizing an ovine lumbar spine model. METHODS: In total, 54 (n=54) sheep lumbar spines (L2-L3) underwent posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) via pedicle screw fixation, connecting rod, and bone graft. Following three experimental variants were investigated: positive control (ideal clinical scenario), negative control (simulation of compromised screw holes), and SRT treatments. Biomechanical and histologic analyses of the functional spinal unit (FSU) were determined as a function of healing time (0, 3, and 12 months postoperative). RESULTS: Screw pull-out, screw break-out, and FSU stability of the SRT treatments were generally equivalent to the positive control group and considerably better than the negative control group. Histomorphology of the SRT treatment screw region of interest (ROI) observed an increase in bone percentage and decrease in void space during healing, consistent with ingrowth at the implant interface. The PLF ROI observed similar bone percentage throughout healing between the SRT treatment and positive control. Less bone formation was observed for the negative control. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that the SRT improved screw retention and afforded effective FSU stabilization to achieve solid fusion in an otherwise compromised fixation scenario in a large animal model.

Successful lumbar surgery results in improved psychological well-being: a longitudinal assessment of depressive and anxiety symptoms.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Preoperative psychological symptoms predict surgical outcomes. The impact of surgical outcomes on psychological well-being, however, has not been delineated. PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare pre- with postoperative depressive and anxiety symptoms based on success of surgery, defined as fulfilled expectations and improvement in disability and pain. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A prospective 2-year longitudinal study in a tertiary care center was carried out. PATIENT SAMPLE: The sample consisted of 276 patients who underwent lumbar surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES: The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) and the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) were the outcome measures. METHODS: Patients completed the following validated surveys several days before and again 2 years after surgery: the GDS with a set threshold for a positive screen for depression; the STAI with population norms used as threshold values; the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI); a numerical pain rating; and the Expectations Survey measuring amount of improvement expected. Dependent variables were pre- to postoperative within-patient change in GDS and STAI scores. Independent variables were three outcomes of surgery: proportion of expectations fulfilled, and changes in ODI scores and pain ratings. Analyses were conducted with GDS and STAI scores as continuous variables and according to threshold values, and for expectations, ODI and pain according to minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs). RESULTS: Mean age was 55, 56% were men, and 78% had degenerative diagnoses. For depressive symptoms, 41% screened positive preoperatively and 16% screened positive postoperatively; 72% had some improvement. In multivariable analysis adjusted for age, gender, comorbidity, diagnosis, and surgical invasiveness, depressive symptoms improved more for more expectations fulfilled (p<.0001), more ODI improvement (p<.0001), and more pain improvement (p=.001). For anxiety symptoms: 59% were worse than population norms preoperatively and 26% were worse postoperatively; 73% had some improvement. In adjusted multivariable analyses, anxiety symptoms improved more for more expectations fulfilled (p=.0002), more ODI improvement (p<.0001), and more pain improvement (p=.03). Similar results were obtained according to threshold values and MCIDs. CONCLUSION: Substantial improvements in psychological well-being resulted after surgery among patients with favorable spine-specific outcomes.

Assessment of the injection behavior of commercially available bone BSMs for Subchondroplasty® procedures.

BACKGROUND: Bone substitute materials (BSMs) have been commercially available for over 30 years and have been used extensively in orthopedic procedures. Some BSMs are described as "injectable." With rising focus on minimally invasive surgical procedures, the range of applications in which these materials are injectable is of clinical interest. Specifically, their performance in closed, pressurized environments in the trabecular bone with microdamage or abnormal bone remodeling have not been well characterized. This issue arises often in the presence of bone marrow lesions of the subchondral bone in early onset osteoarthritis. The objective was to evaluate the in vitro injectability of several common commercially available BSMs. It was hypothesized that some materials self-described as "injectable" would fail to function in a small microarchitecture in comparison to the large void areas. METHODS: Mechanical testing was performed and force data was collected. Each sample was additionally radiographed and then imaged under micro-computed tomography (CT). RESULTS: Most of the BSM materials failed to be successfully injected into a simulated trabecular model. Simplex™, AccuFill® and StrucSure™ materials were the only ones that were injected successfully. Many of the materials underwent phase separation at higher pressures and were not able to be deployed from the injection syringe. In addition, a clinically relevant difference was seen between the manners in which the materials interdigitated into the existing structure. CONCLUSION: The AccuFill® was the only material able to inject in a closed model and demonstrate adequate implantation of BSM into the simulated trabecular bone. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Injectability of BSMs is clinically relevant as the interest in minimally invasive surgical procedures is rising rapidly.

Incidence, diagnosis, and management of sacral fractures following multilevel spinal arthrodesis.

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the sacrum are a rare complication following instrumented spinal fusion, with only 34 cases previously reported in the literature. Previous series have generally been limited to less than five cases. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine the incidence of sacral fractures caudal to instrumented spinal fusion constructs, identify risk factors for fracture and for failure of conservative management, and describe strategies for surgical treatment of these fractures. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective review. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients undergoing instrumented posterior spinal arthrodesis between 2002 and 2011 were included in the sample. OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical and radiographic data from hospital and surgeon records comprise outcome measures. METHODS: Methods include a review of clinical and radiographic data from a prospectively collected patient database recording all adjacent segment fractures during the study period. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients developed sacral fractures caudal to instrumented spinal fusion constructs during the study period. The overall incidence was 6.1% and was significantly greater in fusions greater than four levels (14.5%). The mean time from index surgery to fracture was 4.3 months. Only one fracture was evident on plain radiography at the onset of symptoms. Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and nuclear scintigraphy can all be used to establish the diagnosis. Eight patients were successfully treated conservatively. The mean time to fracture union was 21 weeks. Anterolisthesis of the fracture greater than 2 mm and kyphotic angulation were significantly associated with failure of conservative management. Surgical intervention included posterior extension of the fusion construct to S2 and the iliac wings with sacroiliac joint fusion. In 10 cases, a combined anterior and posterior approach was used that consisted of either revision anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transsacral posterior lumbar interbody fusion. CONCLUSIONS: Sacral fractures following instrumented posterior spinal fusion are an uncommon complication; that is often unrecognized on plain radiographs. Risk factors include osteoporosis and long spinal fusions. Anterolisthesis and kyphosis of the fracture is associated with failure of conservative management.

Major vascular injury during anterior lumbar spinal surgery: incidence, risk factors, and management.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. OBJECTIVE: To examine the incidence of major vascular injury during anterior lumbar spinal surgery, attempt to identify predisposing risk factors, and to discuss management techniques. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Major vascular injury can be a catastrophic complication of anterior lumbar spinal surgery. METHODS: Current procedural terminology codes were used to identify the occurrence of major vascular injury, defined as injury to the iliac vessels, vena cava, and aorta. Once identified, the office record, hospital chart, operative note, and diagnostic test results were reviewed in detail. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-five operations were performed on 338 patients. Incidence of major vascular complication was 2.9% (10 of 345). There were 9 injuries of the common iliac vein and a single aortic injury. Risk factors identified in patients with major vascular injury were current or previous osteomyelitis or discogenic infection (n = 3), previous anterior spinal surgery (n = 2), spondylolisthesis (n = 2; 1 isthmic Grade II, 1 iatrogenic Grade II), large anterior osteophyte (n = 2), transitional lumbosacral vertebra (n = 1), and anterior migration of interbody device (n = 1). Lateral venorrhaphy by suture (n = 6) and hemoclip application (n = 2) was augmented by topical agents, which constituted the sole method of repair on 1 occasion. Magnetic resonance venography demonstrated iliac vein thrombosis in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: Current or previous osteomyelitis or discogenic infection, previous anterior spinal surgery, spondylolisthesis, osteophyte formation, transitional lumbosacral vertebra and anterior migration of interbody device point to an increased risk of vascular injury during anterior lumbar spinal surgery. Careful handling of the vascular structures and liberal use of topical hemostatic agents can lead to control of hemorrhage and preservation of vascular patency. Routine postoperative surveillance for proximal deep vein thrombosis, by magnetic resonance venography of the pelvic veins and inferior vena cava, should be performed after venorrhaphy.