RESUMO
Introduction: There is substantial inequity in survival outcomes for pediatric brain tumor patients residing in high-income countries (HICs) compared to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). To address disparities in pediatric cancer survival, the World Health Organization (WHO) established the Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer (GICC) to expand quality care for children with cancer. Research question: To provide an overview of pediatric neurosurgical capacity and detail the burden of neurosurgical diseases impacting children. Material and methods: A narrative review of the current context of global pediatric neurosurgical capacity as it relates to neurooncology and other diseases relevant to children. Results: In this article, we provide an overview of pediatric neurosurgical capacity and detail the burden of neurosurgical diseases impacting children. We highlight concerted advocacy and legislative efforts aimed at addressing unmet neurosurgical needs in children. Finally, we discuss the potential implications of advocacy efforts on treating pediatric CNS tumors and outline strategies to improve global outcomes for children with brain tumors worldwide in the context of the WHO GICC. Discussion and conclusion: With both global pediatric oncology and neurosurgical initiatives converging on the treatment of pediatric brain tumors, significant strides toward decreasing the burden of pediatric neurosurgical diseases will hopefully be made.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Efforts to address inequities in the treatment of pediatric CNS tumors and the burden of childhood cancer globally have prompted the designation of low-grade glioma as one of six index cancers for the World Health Organization Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer. Understanding the importance of neurosurgical interventions and evaluating pediatric neurosurgical capacity may identify critical interventions to improve outcomes for children with low-grade glioma and other CNS tumors. METHODS: An online, cross-sectional survey assessing pediatric neurosurgical practice and capacity was distributed to members of the International Society of Pediatric Neurosurgery. The survey included 36 items covering domains including patient volume, available infrastructure, scope of practice, case distribution, and multidisciplinary care. RESULTS: Responses from 196 individuals from 61 countries, spanning all WHO regions, were included. Ninety-six (49.0%) were from high-income countries, 57 (29.1%) were from upper-middle-income countries, 42 (21.4%) were from lower-middle-income countries (LMICs), and 1 was (0.5%) from a low-income country. Most respondents had a catchment population of ≥ 1 million and indicated the availability of basic neurosurgical resources such as a dedicated neurosurgical operating theater and surgical microscope. The presence of a neurosurgical intensive care unit, inpatient rehabilitation services, and infection monitoring showed similar availability across country groups. Quantitative scoring of 13 infrastructure and service items established that fewer resources were available in low-income countries/LMICs and upper-middle-income countries compared with high-income countries. The volume of pediatric CNS tumor cases and case distribution did not vary according to World Bank country groups. CONCLUSION: This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of pediatric neurosurgical capacity across the globe, establishing variability of resources on the basis of the country income level. Our findings suggest that pediatric neurosurgeons in LMICs may benefit from key neurosurgical instrumentation and increased support for multidisciplinary brain tumor programs and childhood cancer research efforts.