Assessment of primary prevention patients receiving an ICD - Systematic evaluation of ATP: APPRAISE ATP.

BACKGROUND: The value of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) in the overall cohort of primary prevention patients who receive implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) remains uncertain. ATP success reported in prior trials potentially included a large number of patients receiving unnecessary ATP for arrhythmias that may have self-terminated owing to the prematurity of the intervention. Although some patients derive benefit from initial ATP in terminating rapid ventricular arrhythmias and thereby preventing shocks, there are limited data allowing us to identify those patients a priori. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of APPRAISE ATP is to understand the role of ATP in primary prevention patients currently indicated for ICD therapy in a large prospective randomized controlled trial with modern programming parameters. METHODS: The study is a global, prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial conducted at up to 150 sites globally, enrolling approximately 2600 subjects The primary endpoint of the trial is time to first all-cause shock in a 2-arm study with an equivalent study design in which the incidence of all-cause shocks will be compared between primary prevention subjects programmed with shocks only vs subjects programmed to standard therapy (ATP and shock). RESULTS: An Electrogram and Device Interrogation Core Laboratory will review interrogation data to determine primary endpoints that occur in APPRAISE ATP. Their decisions are based on independent physician review of the data from device interrogation. CONCLUSION: The ultimate purpose of the study is to aid clinicians in the selection of ICD technologies based on hard endpoint evidence across the spectrum of indications for primary prevention implantation.

Super and Nonresponders to Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Quality-of-Life Assessment Using Patient Reported Outcomes.

[Figure: see text].

Predictors of long-term outcomes greater than 10 years after cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is indicated in patients with medically refractory heart failure and wide QRS duration. While much is known about predictors of left ventricular (LV) remodeling after CRT implantation and short-term mortality, limited data exist on long-term outcomes after CRT placement. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing CRT implantation at our center between 2003 and 2008 and examined mortality using institutional electronic records, social security death index, and online obituary search. We included only patients with preimplant echoes with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) 35% or below. Variable selection was performed using stepwise regression and models were compared using goodness-of-fit criteria. A final model was validated with the bootstrap regression method. RESULTS: Out of the 877 CRT patients undergoing implantation during this time, 287 (32.7%) survived longer than 10 years. Significant (P < .05) predictors of survival in our multivariate model were age, left ventricular diastolic diameter, sex, presence of nonischemic vs ischemic cardiomyopathy, QRS duration, atrial fibrillation, BNP levels, and creatinine levels at the time of CRT implantation. A model using the odds ratios from these variables had a receiver operating curve with an area under the curve score of 0.816 (standard error, 0.019) at predicting survival or freedom from LVAD or heart transplant for longer than 10 years after CRT implantation. The specificity for factors 3 or above and 5 or above was 68% and 77%, respectively. CONCLUSION: A large proportion of patients are still alive 10 years after CRT implantation. Variables at the time of CRT implant can help provide prognostic information to patients and electrophysiologists to determine the long-term benefit and survival of patients after CRT implantation.

Complications and Health Care Costs Associated With Transvenous Cardiac Pacemakers in a Nationwide Assessment.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to retrospectively characterize transvenous pacemaker (TVP) complications and associated health care costs in a large-scale U.S. patient cohort. BACKGROUND: TVP complications have previously been shown to affect more than 1 in 10 patients but may be underestimated. Pacemakers are widely implanted across community and urban hospitals by operators of varying specialization and experience. METHODS: Truven Health MarketScan databases track U.S. health care claims and encounters of private or Medicare supplemental insurance. Patients implanted with de dual- and single-chamber TVPs between April 2010 and March 2014 and over 1 year of pre-implantation MarketScan enrollment were identified. International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision and Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to extract relevant comorbidities and complications. Incremental adjusted cost analysis was performed for acute complications, defined as those occurring within 30 days of implantation. RESULTS: Among 72,701 TVP implantations (mean age 75 ± 12 years, 55% men, 13% single chamber) with 1.5 ± 1.1 years of follow-up, acute complications (0 to 1 month) occurred in 7.7% of single- and 9.1% of dual-chamber TVPs and long-term complications (1 to 36 months) in 6.4% and 5.9% of single- and dual-chamber TVPs, respectively. The net 3-year event rates were approximately 15% and 16%. The incidence and incremental cost of complications are considerable. Most common acute complications include thoracic trauma (3.71%, $70,114), leads requiring revision (3.51%, $9,296), and infection (1.15%, $80,247). Long-term complications are attributed to leads (2.84%), infection (2.42%), and pocket (0.96%). CONCLUSIONS: Claims data suggest that TVP complications are more common than previously reported, affecting nearly 1 in 6 patients by 3 years and contributing to considerable incremental U.S. health care cost.