MR sialographic assessment of the masseter muscle and the ductal kinking in patients with recurrent parotitis.

Dysfunction of the masseter muscle may cause pathological kinking of the parotid duct leading to parotitis; MR sialography is a non-invasive radiological examination that allows to evaluate dynamically the ductal system of the parotid glands. In the present study we aimed to assess the relationships between Stensen's duct and masseter muscle and their implications in the aetiopathogenesis of recurrent parotitis secondary to masseter muscle dysfunction. Forty-one patients with recurrent unilateral parotitis and nine with bilateral recurrent parotitis, all with a clinical suspicious of masseter muscle hypertrophy due to bruxism were enrolled. They underwent ultrasonography as a first line examination and then MR sialography and sialendoscopy. Different anatomical features were studied. Involved parotid glands had a wider duct compared to contralateral unaffected parotid glands of patients with recurrent parotitis (p = 0.00134); male subjects with parotitis had a longer duct compared to the salivary glands of healthy patients (p = 0.00943 for affected glands and p = 0.00629 for the contralateral). A concordance between the evidence of an acute duct angle during sialendoscopy and a wider duct in patients with parotitis was observed although not statistically significant. These initial findings suggest that the masticatory muscle dysfunction related to bruxism seems to condition alteration of parotid duct course and anatomy thus favouring the occurrence of recurrent parotitis. A specific diagnostic iter based on clinical evaluation, dynamic ultrasonography and MR sialography, is therefore, mandatory to confirm the relationship between masseter muscle anatomy and parotid duct anomalies; this is the premise for an adequate therapeutic approach to underlying masticatory muscle disorder.

ENT management of children with adenotonsillar disease during COVID-19 pandemic. Ready to start again?

Clinical manifestations of COVID-19 in children are milder, but the real burden of disease is unknown. After the lockdown, in our Region Lombardia we have been requested to progressively resume medical services including outpatient assessment and priority surgery. Therefore, we screened surgical waiting lists with identification of 47 children candidates to priority surgery (among 358). No homogeneous national health surveillance/screening programs are ongoing or have been conceived to test susceptible population among children/healthcare workers in preparation of coming down to routinely daily activities, and diagnostic strategies are not completely accurate in children. So, restoring medical services now might be untimely.

Clinical assessment of adenoidal obstruction based on the nasal obstruction index is no longer useful in children.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of clinical assessment of adenoidal obstruction based on a standardized score of the degree of mouth breathing and speech hyponasality (nasal obstruction index [NOI]) in comparison to nasal fiberoptic endoscopy. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study with planned data collection. SETTING: Outpatient clinics of the Departments of Maternal and Pediatric Sciences and Specialized Surgical Sciences, University of Milan, Italy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Children aged three to 12 years with adenoidal obstruction suspected on the grounds of persistent/recurrent otitis media or perceived obstructive nasal breathing were eligible. Ear, nose, and throat examination, allergy testing, NOI measurement, and nasal fiberoptic endoscopy to assess the degree of adenoidal hypertrophy were performed. Agreement between the NOI and adenoidal hypertrophy grade was assessed in the patients as a whole and by clinical subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 202 children were enrolled: 54.9 percent had otological diseases and 45.1 percent had perceived obstructive nasal breathing. Most of the children (79.2%) showed mild or moderate clinical nasal obstruction. Adenoidal hypertrophy ranged from no obstruction (18%) to severe obstruction (38%). There was no substantial agreement between the NOI and the degree of adenoidal obstruction in the population as a whole and in all the clinical subgroups. False positive findings were significantly more frequent among allergic children (50%) than non-allergic children (22.4%, P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Clinical assessment based on the NOI is incapable of accurately predicting the degree of adenoidal obstruction. In children with clinical nasal obstruction not explainable by adenoidal size, the clinician should consider, among causes of more anterior obstruction, nasal allergy.

Comparative ultrasonographic, magnetic resonance sialographic, and videoendoscopic assessment of salivary duct disorders.

OBJECTIVES: Salivary duct disorders are the second most common cause of obstruction after calculi. Magnetic resonance sialography has been recently proposed as a means of diagnosing a heterogeneous group of salivary disorders, and so we compared it with sialoendoscopy in evaluating stenoses and sialectasia in 24 patients with obstructive symptoms and ultrasonographic results negative for calculi or masses. METHODS: All of the patients (19 of whom had recurrent unilateral or bilateral swollen parotid glands and 5 of whom also had recurrent swollen submandibular glands) underwent dynamic color Doppler ultrasonography and dynamic magnetic resonance sialography with lemon juice stimulation of saliva; 18 patients also underwent diagnostic sialoendoscopy. RESULTS: Ultrasonography and color Doppler ultrasonography showed duct dilatation in all patients (bilateral in 5 with parotid stenosis). Magnetic resonance sialography confirmed duct dilatation and stenosis in all of the patients, and revealed the simultaneous presence of calculi in 4 cases. A parotid sialocele was found in 4 cases. The magnetic resonance sialographic findings were confirmed in the patients who underwent sialoendoscopy. No side effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance sialography following prediagnostic ultrasonography allows an adequate diagnosis of salivary duct disorders such as stenosis and sialectasia, as confirmed by objective sialoendoscopic assessment. Magnetic resonance sialography also makes it possible to visualize the salivary duct system up to its tertiary branches and, in this regard, may be considered a valid, noninvasive method for the evaluation of salivary duct disorders.

Videosialoendoscopic assessment of bilateral atresia of the Wharton's duct orifice in an infant.

Atresia of the submandibular ducts (particularly the duct orifice) is a rare occurrence that is mainly observed in newborns or infants; moreover, its differential diagnosis with other anomalies of the oral floor is sometimes difficult. Given the lack of data concerning the differences between atresia of the orifice of Wharton's duct and other anomalies of the submandibular duct system, we describe here the findings of videosialoendoscopic assessment of the salivary duct system in an infant who underwent traditional surgery for bilateral atresia of the orifice of Wharton's duct. During sialoendoscopy, a trifurcation of the main duct, a normal variant of the more common bifurcation of the secondary branches of the salivary duct system, was observed bilaterally. No other ductal anomalies were encountered. Complete resolution of the symptoms and complete patency of both ducts at 19-month follow-up evaluation were observed. In conclusion, although spontaneous resolution of the disease during feeding is possible, minimal incision of the orifice of the imperforated submandibular duct together with diagnostic videosialoendoscopy of the main salivary duct system may be considered as part of the modern approach to salivary obstructive disorders in pediatric age as is currently the case for sialolithiasis and recurrent juvenile parotitis.