RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To synthesize the evidence about diagnostic accuracy of inferior vena cava collapsibility (IVCc) in prediction of fluid responsiveness among spontaneously breathing patients. DESIGN: Systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies. SETTING: Intensive care units or emergency departments. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: spontaneously breathing patients with indication for fluid bolus administration. INTERVENTIONS: A search was conducted in MEDLINE and EMBASE. We included studies assessing IVCc accuracy for fluid responsiveness assessment with a standard method for cardiac output measure as index test. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: General information (year, setting, cutoffs, standard method), sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiving operator characteristics curve (AUROC). Risk of bias was assessed with QUADAS 2 tool. We obtained the pooled sensitivity, specificity and summary ROC curve, with estimated confidence intervals from a bivariate model. We also calculated positive and negative likelihood ratios and developed a Fagon nomogram. RESULTS: Eight studies were included with 497 patients. Overall, the studies presented a high risk of bias. IVCc sensitivity was 63% (95% CI - 46-78%) and specificity 83% (95% CI - 76-87%). Despite moderate accuracy of IVCc (SROC 0.83, 95% CI - 0.80-0.86), post-test probability of being fluid responsive based on a 50% pre-test probability led to considerable misclassification. CONCLUSIONS: IVCc had moderate accuracy for fluid responsiveness assessment in spontaneously breathing patients and should not be used in isolation for this purpose.
