A Systematic Review of Simulation in Burn Care: Education, Assessment, and Management.

Assessment and management of burns require nuanced, timely interventions in high-stake settings, creating challenges for trainees. Simulation-based education has become increasingly popular in surgical and nonsurgical subspecialties to supplement training without compromising patient safety. This study aimed to systematically review the literature on existing burn management-related simulations. A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Articles describing burn-specific surgical and nonsurgical simulation models were included. The model type, study description, simulated skills, assessment methods, fidelity, cost, and outcomes were collected. Of 3,472 articles, 31 met inclusion criteria. The majority of simulations were high-fidelity (n=17, 54.8%). Most were immersive (n=17, 54.8%) and used synthetic benchtop models (n=13, 41.9%), whereas none were augmented/virtual reality. Simulations of acute and early surgical intervention techniques (n=16, 51.6%) and burn wound assessments (n=15, 48.4%) were the most common, whereas burn reconstruction was the least common (n=3, 9.7%). Technical skills were taught more often (n=29, 93.5%) than non-technical skills (n=15, 48.4%). Subjective assessments (n=18, 58.1%) were used more often than objective assessments (n=23, 74.2%). Of the studies that reported costs, 91.7% (n=11) reported low costs. This review identified the need to expand burn simulator options, especially for burn reconstruction, and highlighted the paucity of animal, cadavers, and augmented/virtual reality models. Developing validated, accessible burn simulations to supplement training may improve education, patient safety, and outcomes.

Gaps in plastic surgery training: A comparative literature review of assessment tools in plastic surgery and general surgery.

Assessment tools for grading technical and nontechnical skills, such as operative technique and professionalism, are well established in general surgery. Less is known regarding the application of these tools in plastic surgery training. This study is a comparative review of the most prevalent assessment tools and rubrics utilized in general and plastic surgery. Two parallel systematic reviews of the literature utilizing PubMed and Cochrane were conducted for articles published between 1990 and 2022. Searches used Boolean operators specific to assessment tools in general and plastic surgery. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria for general surgery assessment tools, and 21 studies were included for plastic surgery assessment tools. Seven studies (50%) evaluated technical skills in general surgery, whereas 15 studies (71%) assessed technical skills in plastic surgery with commonality found in the evaluation of principles, such as tissue and instrument handling and operative flow. Task-specific evaluation tools were described for both general and plastic surgeries. Five studies evaluated nontechnical skills, such as communication and leadership in general surgery, whereas no plastic surgery studies solely examined nontechnical assessment tools. Our literature review demonstrates that standardized skill assessments in plastic surgery are lacking compared with those available in general surgery. Plastic surgery programs should consider implementing competency-based assessment tools in surgical coaching and training for technical and nontechnical skills. More research is necessary in plastic surgery to optimize the evaluation of nontechnical skills.

Reconstructive Surgeons as Essential Operative Consultants: Quantifying the True Value of Plastic Surgeons to an Academic Medical Center.

BACKGROUND: The revenue generated by plastic surgeons assisting other surgical services is poorly captured by hospital accounting systems, which categorize solely by attending physician of record. The financial impact of reconstructive surgery is thus systematically underestimated. The authors sought to quantify the overlooked value of plastic surgeons as consultants who facilitate complex and profitable operations. METHODS: Hospital billing data were reviewed for inpatient operations over a 3-year fiscal period (2015 to 2017). Cases in which a plastic surgeon assisted were identified. Case mix index, a measure of complexity that correlates with profit, and contribution margin, defined as revenue minus cost, were obtained for each case. RESULTS: Five hundred fifty-four cases required a reconstructive surgeon; 18,904 nonconsultation cases were identified for comparison. Average net revenue per case involving a consultation was 1.79 times greater than for control cases (p < 0.0001). Average contribution margin was 1.73 times greater (p < 0.005). The highest contribution margins stemmed from joint cases with cardiothoracic surgery and neurosurgery. Case mix index was significantly higher for consultation cases than for controls (4.5 versus 3.9; p < 0.0001). In 434 cases (78 percent), plastic surgery assisted with an integral aspect of the operation, meaning the surgery could not have been technically performed without reconstructive assistance. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' findings demonstrate that cases involving plastic surgeons have a higher profit margin than those performed by any department alone. However, this revenue is not appropriately attributed because of oversimplified financial metrics. The skill set of reconstructive surgeons is an undervalued resource for both patient care and hospital economics.

Comparative Assessment of Extracranial-to-Intracranial and Intracranial-to-Intracranial In Situ Bypass for Complex Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment Based on Rupture Status: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Comparative outcomes of extracranial-to-intracranial (EC-IC) and intracranial-to-intracranial (IC-IC) bypass for complex aneurysm treatment based on rupture status are not well described in the literature. In this study, we compare outcomes of EC-IC and IC-IC bypass for complex intracranial aneurysm treatment based on rupture status. METHODS: A prospective neurosurgical patient database was retrospectively reviewed. Sixty-three consecutive patients with aneurysm managed with revascularization were identified between July 2014 and December 2018. RESULTS: During the study period, 41 patients with aneurysm underwent EC-IC bypass (65%; 24 [58.5%] ruptured, 17 [41.5%] unruptured) and 22 patients with aneurysm underwent IC-IC bypass (34.9%; 13 [59.1%] ruptured, 9 [40.9%] unruptured). Graft spasm occurred in 4 patients (9.8%) in the EC-IC group (all ruptured aneurysms) and all anastomoses were patent on immediate postoperative imaging. Perioperative mortality occurred in 5 patients who underwent EC-IC bypass (12.2%; 3 ruptured, 2 unruptured) EC-IC and 2 patients who underwent IC-IC bypass (9.1%; both ruptured); (P = 0.709). Bypass-related complications occurred only in patients with ruptured aneurysm (2 [8.3%] in the EC-IC group and 0 [0%] in the IC-IC group; P = 0.285). For unruptured aneurysms, the overall complication rate was lower in IC-IC compared with the EC-IC group (P = 0.006). Modified Rankin Scale scores on discharge were significantly lower in IC-IC compared with EC-IC bypass for unruptured aneurysms (P = 0.008). There was a trend for shorter temporary occlusion and hospitalization times and overall better outcomes with IC-IC compared with EC-IC bypass. CONCLUSIONS: Although often considered riskier than EC-IC bypass, IC-IC in situ bypass showd a favorable technical and safety profile for the treatment of complex, unruptured aneurysms.

Factors Leading to Decreased Rates of Immediate Postmastectomy Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to determine if there was a difference in immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) rates between our public hospital and private cancer center, which share a common faculty with a consistent management philosophy in multidisciplinary care. We investigated the factors affecting postmastectomy reconstruction and IBR rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified women with clinical stage I-II breast cancer who underwent mastectomy at our public hospital, Los Angeles County Medical Center, and our private cancer center, Keck Hospital of USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to study predictors of IBR and any breast reconstruction. RESULTS: Of 293 mastectomy patients, the rate of any breast reconstruction at the private cancer (56.6%) center was higher than that at the public hospital (36.2%). IBR rates for the private cancer center (93.6%) and for patients with private insurance were higher than for the public hospital (40.8%) and likewise for those without insurance (86.7% versus 45.5%). In a multivariate analysis, the odds of IBR at our private cancer center were 22.96 times higher than that at our public hospital. Age >50 y and radiotherapy were independent predictive factors associated with less likelihood of any breast reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Patients at the public hospital had a much lower rate of breast reconstruction than the private cancer center patients, even after controlling for stage and the team of treating physicians. Our results showed that older age and radiotherapy affect rates of breast reconstruction, as do hospital system and insurance status.

Surgical Management and Reconstruction Training (SMART) Course for International Orthopedic Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: The burden of complex orthopedic trauma in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is exacerbated by soft-tissue injuries, which can often lead to amputations. This study's purpose was to create and evaluate the Surgical Management and Reconstruction Training (SMART) course to help orthopedic surgeons from LMICs manage soft-tissue defects and reduce the rate of amputations. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, orthopedic surgeons from LMICs were recruited to attend a 2-day SMART course taught by plastic surgery faculty in San Francisco. Before the course, participants were asked to assess the burden of soft-tissue injury and amputation encountered at their respective sites of practice. A survey was then given immediately and 1-year postcourse to evaluate the quality of instructional materials and the course's effect in reducing the burden of amputation, respectively. RESULTS: Fifty-one practicing orthopedic surgeons from 25 countries attended the course. No participant reported previously attempting a flap reconstruction procedure to treat a soft-tissue defect. Before the course, participants cumulatively reported 580-970 amputations performed annually as a result of soft-tissue defects. Immediately after the course, participants rated the quality and effectiveness of training materials to be a mean of ≥4.4 on a Likert scale of 5 (Excellent) in all 14 instructional criteria. Of the 34 (66.7%) orthopedic surgeons who completed the 1-year postcourse survey, 34 (100%, P < 0.01) reported performing flaps learned at the course to treat soft-tissue defects. Flap procedures prevented 116 patients from undergoing amputation; 554 (93.3%) of the cumulative 594 flaps performed by participants 1 year after the course were reported to be successful. Ninety-seven percent of course participants taught flap reconstruction techniques to colleagues or residents, and a self-reported estimate of 28 other surgeons undertook flap reconstruction as a result of information dissemination by 1 year postcourse. CONCLUSION: The SMART Course can give orthopedic surgeons in LMICs the skills and knowledge to successfully perform flaps, reducing the self-reported incidence of amputations. Course participants were able to disseminate flap reconstructive techniques to colleagues at their home institution. While this course offers a collaborative, sustainable approach to reduce global surgical disparities in amputation, future investigation into the viability of teaching the SMART course in LMICs is warranted.