Disparities in 30-Day Readmission Between Medicare/Medicaid and Private Insurance Among Patients With Heart Failure Screened for Cognitive Impairment.

BACKGROUND: Racial disparities exist among patients with heart failure (HF). HF is often comorbid with cognitive impairment. Appropriate self-care can prevent HF hospital readmissions but requires access to resources through insurance. Racial differences exist between insurance types, and this may influence the disparity between races and patients with HF and cognitive impairment. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to examine the relationships between insurance type and self-care stratified by race and to assess for differences in time-to-30-day readmission among patients with HF with cognitive impairment. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of data collected among hospitalized patients with HF with cognitive impairment. Patients completed surveys on self-care (Self-Care of Heart Failure Index), HF knowledge (Dutch Heart Failure Knowledge Scale), depression (Geriatric Depression Scale), and social support (Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease Social Support Inventory). Socioeconomic data were collected. Linear models were created to examine the relationships between insurance type and self-care by race. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression were used to assess readmission. RESULTS: The sample of 125 patients with HF with cognitive impairment was predominantly Black (68%, n = 85) and male (53%, n = 66). The sample had either Medicare/Medicaid (62%, n = 78) or private insurance (38%, n = 47). Black patients with HF with cognitive impairment and private insurance reported higher self-care confidence compared with Black patients with HF with cognitive impairment and Medicare/Medicaid ( P < .05). Medicare/Medicaid was associated with a higher frequency of 30-day readmission and a faster time-to-readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HF with cognitive impairment and Medicare/Medicaid insurance reported lower self-care confidence and more likely to be readmitted within 30 days.

Trends in NIH-funding to schools of nursing in the last 17 years.

BACKGROUND: Growing clinical demands, faculty retirements, fewer PhD-prepared graduates, and funding instability are challenges for nursing science. PURPOSE: The purpose of this analysis was to investigate National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding patterns in schools of nursing (SONs). METHODS: Data were extracted from the Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research between 2006 and 2022. Growth modeling examined changes in funding over time between private and public SONs. DISCUSSION: In the last 17 years, NIH funding for SONs has risen nearly 25% but remains only 1% of the total NIH budget for extramural research. Overall, 109 (75%) of the SONs were public and 36 (25%) were private institutions. Regarding geography, 90% of the States received NIH funding except six: ID, ME, MS, NH, VT, and WY. Private SONs consistently received more funding than public SONs but the difference was only statistically significant in 2022. CONCLUSION: NIH funding has significantly increased to SONs, there is better geographic distribution but a funding disparity exists between public and private SONs.