Reduction in inappropriate hospital use based on analysis of the causes.

BACKGROUND: To reduce inappropriate admissions and stays with the application of an improvement cycle in patients admitted to a University Hospital. The secondary objective is to analyze the hospital cost saved by reducing inadequacy after the implementation of measures proposed by the group for improvement. METHODS: Pre- and post-analysis of a sample of clinical histories studied retrospectively, in which the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP) was applied to a representative hospital sample of 1350 clinical histories in two phases. In the first phase the AEP was applied retrospectively to 725 admissions and 1350 stays. The factors associated with inappropriateness were analysed together with the causes, and specific measures were implemented in a bid to reduce inappropriateness. In the second phase the AEP was reapplied to a similar group of clinical histories and the results of the two groups were compared. The cost of inappropriate stays was calculated by cost accounting. SETTING: General University Hospital with 426 beds serving a population of 320,000 inhabitants in the centre of Murcia, a city in south-eastern Spain. RESULTS: Inappropriate admissions were reduced significantly: 7.4% in the control group and 3.2% in the intervention group. Likewise, inappropriate stays decreased significantly from 24.6% to 10.4%. The cost of inappropriateness in the study sample fell from 147,044 euros to 66,642 euros. The causes of inappropriateness for which corrective measures were adopted were those that showed the most significant decrease. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to reduce inadequacy by applying measures based on prior analysis of the situation in each hospital.

Associated factors and cost of inappropriate hospital admissions and stays in a second-level hospital.

The objective of this study was to analyze the variables related to inappropriate admissions and hospital stays and their financial repercussions. This was a descriptive retrospective study in which the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP) was applied to a representative sample of 725 hospital admissions and 1350 hospital stays. The cost of inappropriate stays was calculated by cost accounting. The study found that 7.4% of admissions and 24.6% of stays were inappropriate. Inappropriate admissions were significantly related to medical specialties and younger patient age. Inappropriate stays were related to these factors, plus patients being outside their corresponding areas, nonurgent admissions, and low occupancy rate. The cost of the inappropriate admissions and stays was 147 044 euros. Extrapolated to the hospital as a whole this would represent 2125638 euros per year. Steps must be taken to reduce inappropriate admissions and stays to lower health care costs and to reserve hospital resources for patients who genuinely need them.

Evaluation and monitoring of the clinical pathway for thyroidectomy.

The aim of this study is to present the evaluation and monitoring of a clinical pathway for thyroidectomy 1 year after its implementation and after 4 years' follow up. We compare the results of an evaluation and monitoring indicators series before and after the establishment of the clinical pathway for thyroidectomy in the Surgery Department of Morales Meseguer Hospital, a general university hospital in Murcia, Spain. Implementation of the clinical pathway led to a reduction in length of hospital stay for all the surgery patients (4.8 +/- 2.1 and 3.6 +/- 1.9 days before and after pathway implementation, respectively; P < 0.001). Implementation of the clinical pathway led to a reduction in cost in all the operated patients (3357 +/- 966 and 2695 +/- 970 US$ before and after implementing the clinical pathway, respectively; P < 0.001). Evolution of the mean hospital cost according to year of study shows a reduction from 2000 (3400 +/- 1056 US$) to 2004 (2404 +/- 666 US$) with a slight increase during 2005 (2721 +/- 1335 US$) (P < 0.001). Implementation of the clinical pathway for thyroidectomy has successfully reduced clinical variation and therefore the length of hospital stay and mean cost of the process. In subsequent years, no such major improvements have been made with regard to hospital stay, although they are still clearly better than those before pathway implementation.