RESUMO
Background: An automated hand-hygiene monitoring system (AHHMS) was implemented in October 2019 at the Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez (HIMFG), a tertiary pediatric referral hospital, in four of the hospital wards with the highest rates of Healthcare Associated Infections (HAIs). The clinical and economic impact of this system had not yet been assessed prior to this study. This study aimed to evaluate if the AHHMS is a cost-effective alternative in reducing HAIs in the HIMFG. Methodology: A full cost-effectiveness economic assessment was carried out for the hospital. The alternatives assessed were AHHMS implementation vis-a-vis AHHMS non-implementation (historical tendency). The outcomes of interest were infection rate per 1,000 patient-days and cost savings as a result of prevented infections. Infection rate data per 1,000 patient-days (PD) were obtained from the hospital's Department of Epidemiology with respect to the AHHMS. As regards historical tendency, an infection-rate model was designed for the most recent 6-year period. Infection costs were obtained from a review of available literature on the subject, and the cost of the implemented AHHMS was provided by the hospital. The assessment period was 6 months. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was estimated. Costs are reported in US Dollars (2021). Univariate sensitivity and threshold analysis for different parameters was conducted. Results: The total estimated cost of the AHHMS alternative represented potential savings of $308,927-$546,795 US Dollars compared to non-implementation of the system (US$464,102 v. US$773,029-$1,010,898) for the period. AHHMS effectiveness was reflected in a diminished number of infections, 46-79 (-43.4-56.7%) compared to non-implementation (60 v. 106-139 infections). Conclusion: The AHHMS was found to be a cost-saving alternative for the HIMFG given its cost-effectiveness and lower cost vis-a-vis the alternate option. Accordingly, the recommendation was made of extending its use to other areas in the hospital.
Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar , Higiene das Mãos , Humanos , Criança , Análise de Custo-Efetividade , México , Hospitais Pediátricos , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controleRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of frailty with out-of-pocket expenses (OOPEs) during the last year of life of Mexican older adults. METHODS: Cross-sectional secondary analysis of the Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS), a representative population-based cohort study. Health care expenses were estimated, and a probit model was used to estimate the probability that older adults had OOPE. A general linear model was applied to explain OOPE magnitudes. RESULTS: A total of 55.8% of individuals reported having OOPE with a mean of 3,261 USD. Average OOPE for hospitalization during the last year of life was 7,011.9 USD. Older adults taking their own medical decisions during the last year of life expended less than those who did not. CONCLUSION: No affiliation to health services, frailty, and health decision-making by others increased the probability of OOPE. The magnitude is determined by age, hospitalization, medical visits, affiliation, frailty, and health decision-making by others.
Assuntos
Fragilidade , Gastos em Saúde , Idoso , Envelhecimento , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Transversais , HumanosRESUMO
Resumen: Objetivo: Estimar el gasto de bolsillo (GB) durante el último año de vida en adultos mayores (AM) mexicanos. Material y métodos: Estimación del GB del último año de vida de AM, ajustando por tipo de manejo, afiliación y causa de muerte. Se emplearon datos del Estudio Nacional de Salud y Envejecimiento en México (2012). Los gastos en medicamentos, consultas médicas y hospitalización durante el año previo a la muerte conforman el GB. El GB se ajustó por inflación y se reporta en dólares americanos 2018. Resultados: La media de GB fue $6 255.3±18 500. En el grupo de atención ambulatoria el GB fue $4 134.9±13 631.3. El GB en hospitalización fue $7 050.6±19 971.0. Conclusiones: La probabilidad de incurrir en GB es menor cuando no se requiere hospitalización. Con hospitalización, la afiliación a la seguridad social y atenderse en hospitales públicos juega un papel protector.
Abstract: Objective: To estimate the out-of-pocket expenses (OOPE) during the last year of life in Mexican older adults (OA). Materials and methods: Estimation of the OOPE corresponding to the last year of life of OA, adjusting by type of management, affiliation and cause of death. Data from the National Health and Aging Study in Mexico (2012) were used. To calculate the total OOPE, the expenses in the last year were used in: medications, medical consultations and hospitalization. The OOPE was adjusted for inflation and is reported in US dollars 2018. Results: The mean OOPE was $6 255.3±18 500. In the ambulatory care group, the OOPE was $4 134.9±13 631.3. The OOPE in hospitalization was $7 050.6±19 971.0. Conclusions: The probability of incurre in OOPE is lower when hospitalization is not required. With hospitalization, affiliation to social security and attending to public hospitals plays a protective role.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Preparações Farmacêuticas/economia , Gastos em Saúde , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Financiamento Pessoal/economia , Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Hospitalização/economia , Previdência Social/economia , Assistência Terminal/economia , Causas de Morte , MéxicoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the out-of-pocket expenses (OOPE) during the last year of life in Mexican older adults (OA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Estimation of the OOPE corresponding to the last year of life of OA, adjusting by type of management, affiliation and cause of death. Data from the National Health and Aging Study in Mexico (2012) were used. To calculate the total OOPE, the expenses in the last year were used in: medications, medical consultations and hospitalization. The OOPE was adjusted for inflation and is reported in US dollars 2018. RESULTS: The mean OOPE was $6 255.3±18 500. In the ambulatory care group, the OOPE was $4 134.9±13 631.3. The OOPE in hospitalization was $7 050.6±19 971.0. CONCLUSIONS: The probability of incurre in OOPE is lower when hospitalization is not required. With hospitalization, affiliation to social security and attending to public hospitals plays a protective role.
OBJECTIVE: Estimar el gasto de bolsillo (GB) durante el último año de vida en adultos mayores (AM) mexicanos. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Estimación del GB del último año de vida de AM, ajustando por tipo de manejo, afiliación y causa de muerte. Se emplearon datos del Estudio Nacional de Salud y Envejecimiento en México (2012). Los gastos en medicamentos, consultas médicas y hospitalización durante el año previo a la muerte conforman el GB. El GB se ajustó por inflación y se reporta en dólares americanos 2018. RESULTS: La media de GB fue $6 255.3±18 500. En el grupo de atención ambulatoria el GB fue $4 134.9±13 631.3. El GB en hospitalización fue $7 050.6±19 971.0. CONCLUSIONS: La probabilidad de incurrir en GB es menor cuando no se requiere hospitalización. Con hospitalización, la afiliación a la seguridad social y atenderse en hospitales públicos juega un papel protector.
Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Financiamento Pessoal/economia , Gastos em Saúde , Hospitalização/economia , Preparações Farmacêuticas/economia , Assistência Terminal/economia , Idoso , Causas de Morte , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , México , Previdência Social/economiaRESUMO
Introducción. La hemofilia A es causada por la deficiencia del factor VIII. El tratamiento consiste principalmente en aumentar la concentración del FVIII en la sangre utilizando productos de remplazo. El objetivo de este trabajo fue estimar los beneficios clínicos y económicos del manejo profiláctico con factor VIII en niños con hemofilia A en México. Métodos. Se realizó la evaluación económica del manejo profiláctico (PROF) y del tratamiento sobre demanda (SD). Las estrategias comparadas fueron el manejo profiláctico -consistente en FVIII recombinante 25 UI/kg cada tercer día- vs. tratamiento sobre demanda -consistente en FVIII derivado de plasma 40 UI/kg. Se reportó el número de sangrados evitados (SE). Se empleó una tasa de descuento del 5%. Los resultados se expresaron en pesos mexicanos. Resultados. El costo de incremental de PROF respecto a SD fue de $7,727,554 pesos. El manejo con PROF ofrece una reducción de 112 SE frente al manejo de SD (162.9 vs. 50.7). El costo por SE fue de $68,876 pesos. Conclusiones. Un abordaje con PROF mejora la calidad de vida respecto al manejo SD y reduce el número de hemorragias que enfrentan los niños con hemofilia A. PROF es una alternativa costo-efectiva (RCEI $68,876 pesos) para reducir sangrados de acuerdo con la disponibilidad de pago establecida por las autoridades de salud en México.
Background. Hemophilia A is due to a deficiency of factor VIII. Treatment consists primarily of increasing the concentration of FVIII in the blood using replacement products. The aim of this study was to estimate the clinical and economic benefits of prophylactic management with factor VIII in children with hemophilia A in Mexico. We undertook this study to estimate the clinical and economic benefits of prophylactic management (PROF) with factor VIII (FVIII) in children with severe hemophilia in Mexico. Methods. We carried out an economic evaluation of PROF vs. treatment on demand (OD). The strategies compared were management with PROF consisting of recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) 25 IU kg every other day vs. OD management consisting of plasma-derived FVIII (pdFVIII) 40 IU kg. A Markov model was performed with a time horizon of 16 years in patients with severe hemophilia for 2 years, reporting the number of events of bleeding averted (BA). We used a discount rate of 5%. The results are expressed in Mexican pesos (2012). Results. The incremental cost of PROF regarding SD was $7,727,554 pesos. PROF management provides a reduction of 112 BA vs. OD management (162.9 vs. 50.7). Cost per BA was $68,876 pesos. Conclusions. Management with PROF reduces the number of bleeding events facing children with hemophilia A compared to OD management. PROF is a cost-effective alternative to reduce bleeding ($68,876 pesos per BA) according to the willingness to pay established by health authorities in Mexico.