Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38083635

RESUMO

The present study aims to assess a novel technological device suitable for investigating perceptual and attentional competencies in people with or without sensory impairment. The TechPAD is a cabled system including embedded sensors and actuators to enable visual, auditory, and tactile interactions and a capacitive surface receiving inputs from the user. The system is conceived to create multisensory environments, using multiple units controlled separately and simultaneously. We assessed the device by adapting a spatial attention task comparing performances in different cognitive load conditions (high or low) and stimulation (unimodal, bimodal, or trimodal). 28 sighted adults were asked to monitor both the central and peripheral parts of the device and to tap a target stimulus (either visual, auditory, haptic, or multimodal) as fast as they could. Our results suggest that this new device can provide congruent and incongruent multimodal stimuli and quantitatively measure parameters such as reaction time and accuracy, allowing to investigate perceptual mechanisms in multisensory environments.Clinical Relevance-The TechPad is a reliable tool for the assessment of spatial attention during interactive tasks. its application in clinical trials will pave the way to its role in multisensory rehabilitation.


Assuntos
Atenção , Visão Ocular , Adulto , Humanos , Atenção/fisiologia , Tempo de Reação , Tato/fisiologia , Análise e Desempenho de Tarefas
2.
Toxicol Lett ; 227(1): 41-9, 2014 May 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24657525

RESUMO

In recent years, the official regulation of chemicals and chemical products has been intensified. Explicitly for spray products enhanced requirements to assess the consumers'/professionals' exposure to such product type have been introduced. In this regard the Aerosol-Dispensers-Directive (75/324/EEC) with obligation for marketing aerosol dispensers, and the Cosmetic-Products-Regulation (1223/2009/EC) which obliges the insurance of a safety assessment, have to be mentioned. Both enactments, similar to the REACH regulation (1907/2006/EC), require a robust chemical safety assessment. From such assessment, appropriate risk management measures may be identified to adequately control the risk of these chemicals/products to human health and the environment when used. Currently, the above-mentioned regulations lack the guidance on which data are needed for preparing a proper hazard analysis and safety assessment of spray products. Mandatory in the process of inhalation risk and safety assessment is the determination and quantification of the actual exposure to the spray product and more specifically, its ingredients. In this respect the current article, prepared by the European Aerosol Federation (FEA, Brussels) task force "Inhalation Toxicology", intends to introduce toxicological principles and the state of the art in currently available exposure models adapted for typical application scenarios. This review on current methodologies is intended to guide safety assessors to better estimate inhalation exposure by using the most relevant data.


Assuntos
Aerossóis/efeitos adversos , Qualidade de Produtos para o Consumidor , Modelos Biológicos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Testes de Toxicidade , Administração por Inalação , Administração Intranasal , Aerossóis/administração & dosagem , Aerossóis/normas , Animais , Qualidade de Produtos para o Consumidor/legislação & jurisprudência , União Europeia , Alemanha , Guias como Assunto , Humanos , Legislação de Medicamentos , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Nível de Efeito Adverso não Observado , Medição de Risco/legislação & jurisprudência , Testes de Toxicidade/normas
3.
Transplant Proc ; 38(10): 3561-3, 2006 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17175331

RESUMO

We report the results of a prospective, intent-to-treat (ITT) trial on the costs of selective tumor downsizing (DS) before liver transplantation (LT) for patients affected with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The trial started in January 1997 including adult patients with nodular-type HCC within and beyond the Milan criteria. Patients were downsized with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) and/or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) according to clinical predictors. TACE and RFA were performed as inpatient procedures, while PEI was performed on an outpatient basis. Costs of DS were obtained according to the Tuscany Health Reimbursement Fee Catalog adjusted to yearly inflation rates from 1997 through 2005. Data analysis was performed at 1 year after the last enrollment of 198 patients, including 161 (81.3%) who were transplanted: 34 (17.2%) dropped out and 3 (1.5%) were still on the waiting list. One hundred and fifty-two patients (76.7%) underwent DS for a total of 201 procedures: 159 TACE, 39 PEI, and 3 RFA. Overall costs in Euros (euro) of waitlisting were 861,801.24 euro: 548,460 euro (63.7%) for pretransplantation evaluation; 197,994.84 euro (22.9%) for control visits and hospitalizations; and 115.346.4 euro (13.4%) for DS. Mean costs of DS were 758.58 euro +/- 270 euro per downstaged patient (747.53 euro +/- 257.1 euro Milan; 774.01 euro +/- 287.71 euro non-Milan); 582.85 euro +/- 398.87 euro per waitlisted patient (520.28 euro +/- 406.23 euro Milan; 520.28 +/- 364.48 euro non-Milan); and 716.4 euro per transplanted patient (580.67 euro Milan; 1026.76 euro non-Milan; +76.8%). A selective policy of tumor DS increased the costs of LT waitlisting by 13.4%, but due to higher dropout rates among non-Milan patients, the cost utility of DS was 76.8% higher in the Milan group.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirurgia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Transplante de Fígado/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Embolização Terapêutica/economia , Humanos , Itália , Neoplasias Hepáticas/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Listas de Espera
5.
Br J Cancer ; 86(2): 213-7, 2002 Jan 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11870508

RESUMO

Recently, we reported a highly active regimen in advanced gastric cancer including a weekly administration of cisplatin, epidoxorubicin, leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil with the support of filgrastim. In order to simplify the administration and to decrease the toxicity of these drugs, mainly epidoxorubicin-induced alopecia, we designed a regimen including an infusional 5-fluorouracil schedule according to the de Gramont regimen, cisplatin and mitomycin C replacing epidoxorubicin. Forty-five patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer were treated with cisplatin 50 mg m(-2) i.v. on day 1, every 2 weeks, 6S-stereoisomer-leucovorin 100 mg m(-2) i.v. followed by 5-fluorouracil 400 mg m(-2) i.v. bolus and 600 mg m(-2) i.v. in a 22-h infusion, on days 1 and 2, every 2 weeks, and mitomycin C 7 mg m(-2) i.v. bolus on day 2, every 6 weeks. Grades 3-4 toxicities (National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria) consisted mainly of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Five patients had a complete response and 16 had a partial response for an overall response rate of 46.7% (95% confidence interval, 32.1-61.2%). The median survival was 11 months. The combination of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin according to de Gramont, and mitomycin C seems to be an active and safe regimen in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Because of its low cost it may be suggested for patients not enrolled into clinical trials.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economia , Carcinoma/patologia , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos de Medicamentos , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Injeções Intravenosas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mitomicina/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Radiol Med ; 93(3): 267-72, 1997 Mar.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9221421

RESUMO

Post-treatment cancer patient surveillance is an area with few given standards where the need of guidelines has become imperative with the recent emphasis on controlling the ever-increasing health care cost. Unfortunately, literature reports are often inconclusive and ambiguous, mostly because of the lack of properly controlled trials comparing the cost and benefits of various follow-up protocols. In addition, the actual impact on patient survival and quality of life is questionable. At the Istituto del Radio "O. Alberti" (IRA), we consider the follow-up as a sort of population screening aimed at the early detection and treatment of recurrent disease. While aggressive surveillance undoubtedly detects some cancers before symptoms develop, it is debated whether the impact on survival and quality of life are measurable. The early detection of relapse is only a potential survival benefit if recurrent disease is curable with further treatment or at least if salvage treatment is more effective in patients with less severe disease. We investigated the effectiveness, efficacy and medical care of our follow-up protocol. April to June, 1996, we examined 1,223 of 2,148 expected patients; 225 patients disattended the scheduled visits. IRA spent about It. L. 33,800 per examination. Fifty-seven patients were hospitalized to carry out treatment and IRA hospitalization charges were about It. L. 1,100,000 while overall social expenses were about It. L. 6,600,000. Regular visits to see an oncologist provide easy access to specialist medicine and convey a sense of being looked after with a caring system. 94.5% of patients prefers to continue the follow-up program with scheduled visits. Most patients (70%) know about the examinations they undergo but consistently overestimate the importance of laboratory tests and imaging findings and underestimate the importance of medical history and physical examination. In addition, most patients (95%) misinterpret the term "normal" relative to a test result. This study suggests that patients are unfamiliar with the limitations of more costly diagnostic and follow-up studies, which reflects the fact that physicians spend little time discussing follow-up strategies with their patients, especially regarding the cost-benefit analysis and the sensitivity and specificity of the laboratory tests and imaging examinations. Finally, in our opinion follow-up cost is acceptable even though expenses should be reduced optimizing the request of instrumental examinations. Therefore, oncologists should definitely try to inform their patients about the clinical importance of follow-up.


Assuntos
Institutos de Câncer/normas , Gerenciamento Clínico , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Institutos de Câncer/organização & administração , Custos e Análise de Custo , Seguimentos , Humanos , Itália , Neoplasias/economia , Qualidade de Vida
7.
Acta Eur Fertil ; 25(5): 283-9, 1994.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7660715

RESUMO

The semen of the male partners of 37 infertile couples was analyzed with the use of the HTM-S Motility Analyzer (HTM-S MA). For each sample it was thus possible to assess the Total Concentration (TC), the Motile Cell Population Concentration (MCPC), the Progressive Cell Population Concentration (PCPC), the Average Path Velocity (VAP), the Straight Line Velocity (VSL), the Curvilinear Velocity (VCL), the Straightness (STR), the Linearity (LIN), the Lateral Head Displacement (ALH) and the Head Size (HS). The same parameters were then measured on the same semen after treatment with the Pellet Swim-up (PSu) and following Centrifugation on reduced-volume Discontinuous Percoll gradient (mini-CDPG). There was a significant difference in the TC (51.63 M/ml +/- 43.99 in the untreated ejaculate, 11.48 M/ml +/- 9.66 after PSu, 7.94 M/ml +/- 7.3 after mini-CDPG; chi r2 = 50.392, p < 0.05), in the MCPC (20.95 M/ml +/- 26.29 in the untreated ejaculate, 3.79 M/ml +/- 4.26 after PSu, and 2.74 M/ml +/- 3.73 after mini-CDPG; chi r2 = 33.55, p < 0.05), and in the PCPC (7.8 M/ml +/- 12.87 in the untreated ejaculate, 1.81 M/ml +/- 2.36 after PSu, and 1.28 M/ml +/- 1.73 after min-CDPG; chi r2 = 6.38; p < 0.05). The overall comparison between the couples showed a significant difference in the MCPC after PSu and after mini-CDPG (z = -2.09, p < 0.05) whereas no significant difference was found in the comparison off the results of either the TC after PSu and after mini-CDPG (z = -1.9; NS), or of the PCPC after PSu and after mini-CDPG (z = -1.68; NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Assuntos
Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/normas , Sêmen/fisiologia , Motilidade dos Espermatozoides/fisiologia , Adulto , Centrifugação com Gradiente de Concentração , Humanos , Infertilidade Masculina/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Contagem de Espermatozoides , Espermatozoides/citologia , Espermatozoides/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA