Arteriovenous malformations in the cerebellopontine angle: assessment of the "backdoor resection" technique and microsurgical results in 38 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Posterior fossa arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) represent 7% to 15% of all intracranial AVMs and are associated with an increased risk of hemorrhage, morbidity, and mortality compared with supratentorial AVMs, thus prompting urgent and definitive treatment. Cerebellopontine angle (CPA) AVMs are a unique group of posterior fossa AVMs incorporating characteristics of brainstem and cerebellar lesions, which are particularly amenable to microsurgical resection. This study reports the clinical, radiological, operative, and outcome features of patients with CPA AVMs in a large cohort. METHODS: The authors conducted a single-surgeon, 2-institution retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients with CPA AVMs treated with microsurgical resection during a 25-year period. RESULTS: CPA AVMs represented 22% (38 of 176) of all infratentorial AVMs resected by the senior author. Overall, 38 patients (22 [58%] male and 16 [42%] female) met the study inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Most patients presented with hemorrhage (n = 29, 76%). The median age at surgery was 56 (range 6-82) years. Subtypes included 22 (58%) petrosal cerebellar AVMs, 11 (29%) lateral pontine AVMs, and 5 (13%) AVMs involving both the brainstem and cerebellum. Most AVM niduses were small (< 3 cm; n = 35, 92%) and compact (n = 31, 82%). Fourteen (37%) patients harbored flow-related aneurysms. Twenty (53%) patients underwent preoperative embolization. Complete angiographic obliteration was achieved with microsurgery in 35 (92%) patients. Five (13%) patients with poor neurological conditions at presentation died before hospital discharge. Of the 7 (18%) patients with new postoperative neurological deficits, 5 had transient deficits. The median (interquartile range) follow-up was 1.7 (0.5-3.2) years; 32 (84%) patients were alive at last follow-up, and 30 (79%) had achieved a favorable neurological outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0-2). The only independent predictor of unfavorable postoperative outcome (mRS score 3-6) was the preoperative mRS score (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: CPA AVMs are unique posterior fossa lesions, including petrosal cerebellar and lateral pontine AVMs. The "backdoor resection" technique provides a safe and efficient strategy with high obliteration rates and a low risk of treatment-related morbidity. Microsurgical resection should be considered the frontline treatment for most CPA AVMs, except for those with a significant diffuse brainstem component.

Early Treatment of Ruptured Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations: Analysis of Neurological Outcomes and Health Care Costs.

BACKGROUND: The timing of surgical resection is controversial when managing ruptured arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and varies considerably among centers. OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyze clinical outcomes and hospital costs associated with delayed treatment in a ruptured cerebral AVM patient cohort. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgical treatment for a ruptured cerebral AVM (January 1, 2015-December 31, 2020) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who underwent emergent treatment of a ruptured AVM because of acute herniation were excluded, as were those treated >180 days after rupture. Patients were stratified by the timing of surgical intervention relative to AVM rupture into early (postbleed days 1-20) and delayed (postbleed days 21-180) treatment cohorts. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients were identified. The early treatment cohort comprised 75 (86%) patients. The mean (SD) length of time between AVM rupture and surgical resection was 5 (5) days in the early cohort and 73 (60) days in the delayed cohort ( P < .001). The cohorts did not differ with respect to patient demographics, AVM size, Spetzler-Martin grade, frequency of preoperative embolization, or severity of clinical presentation ( P ≥ .15). Follow-up neurological status was equivalent between the cohorts ( P = .65). The associated mean health care costs were higher in the delayed treatment cohort ($241 597 [$99 363]) than in the early treatment cohort ($133 989 [$110 947]) ( P = .02). After adjustment for length of stay, each day of delayed treatment increased cost by a mean of $2465 (95% CI = $967-$3964, P = .002). CONCLUSION: Early treatment of ruptured AVMs was associated with significantly lower health care costs than delayed treatment, but surgical and neurological outcomes were equivalent.

A comprehensive assessment of self-reported symptoms among patients harboring an unruptured intracranial aneurysm.

Background: Approximately 3.2%-6% of the general population harbor an unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA). Ruptured aneurysms represent a significant healthcare burden, and preventing rupture relies on early detection and treatment. Most patients with UIAs are asymptomatic, and many of the symptoms associated with UIAs are nonspecific, which makes diagnosis challenging. This study explored symptoms associated with UIAs, the rate of resolution of such symptoms after microsurgical treatment, and the likely pathophysiology. Methods: A retrospective review of patients with UIAs who underwent microsurgical treatment from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2020, at a single quaternary center were identified. Analyses included the prevalence of nonspecific symptoms upon clinical presentation and postoperative follow-up; comparisons of symptomatology by aneurysmal location; and comparisons of patient demographics, aneurysmal characteristics, and poor neurologic outcome at postoperative follow-up stratified by symptomatic versus asymptomatic presentation. Results: The analysis included 454 patients; 350 (77%) were symptomatic. The most common presenting symptom among all 454 patients was headache (n = 211 [46%]), followed by vertigo (n = 94 [21%]), cognitive disturbance (n = 68[15%]), and visual disturbance (n = 64 [14%]). Among 328 patients assessed for postoperative symptoms, 258 (79%) experienced symptom resolution or improvement. Conclusion: This cohort demonstrates that the clinical presentation of patients with UIAs can be associated with vague and nonspecific symptoms. Early detection is crucial to prevent aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. It is imperative that physicians not rule out aneurysms in the setting of nonspecific neurologic symptoms.

Cost-Effectiveness of Forgoing Postoperative Catheter Angiography After Microsurgical Occlusion of Spinal Dorsal Intradural Arteriovenous Fistulas.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal dorsal intradural arteriovenous fistulas (DI-AVFs) represent 70% of all spinal vascular lesions. Diagnostic tools include pre- and postoperative digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and intraoperative indocyanine green videoangiography (ICG-VA). ICG-VA has a high predictive value in DI-AVF occlusion, but postoperative DSA remains a core component of postoperative protocols. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential cost reduction of forgoing postoperative DSA after microsurgical occlusion of DI-AVFs. METHODS: Cohort-based cost effectiveness study of all DI-AVFs within a prospective, single-center cerebrovascular registry from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2021. RESULTS: Complete data including intraoperative ICG-VA and costs were available for 11 patients. Mean (SD) age was 61.5 (14.8) years. All DI-AVFs were treated with microsurgical clip ligation of the draining vein. ICG-VA showed complete obliteration in all patients. Postoperative DSA was performed for 6 patients and confirmed complete obliteration. Mean (SD) cost contributions for DSA and ICG-VA were $11,418 ($4,861) and $12 ($2), respectively. Mean (SD) total costs were $63,543 ($15,742) and $53,369 ($27,609) for patients who did and did not undergo postoperative DSA, respectively. Comorbidity status was identified as the main driver of total cost (P = 0.01 after adjusting for postoperative DSA status). CONCLUSIONS: ICG-VA is a powerful diagnostic tool in demonstrating microsurgical cure of DI-AVFs, with a negative predictive value of 100%. Eliminating postoperative DSA in patients with confirmed DI-AVF obliteration on ICG-VA may yield substantial cost savings, in addition to sparing patients the risk and inconvenience of a potentially unnecessary invasive procedure.

Procedural, workforce, and reimbursement trends in neuroendovascular procedures.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to define the proportion of Medicare neuroendovascular procedures performed by different specialists from 2013 to 2019, map the geographic distribution of these specialists, and trend reimbursement for these procedures. METHODS: The Medicare Provider Utilization Database was queried for recognized neuroendovascular procedures. Data on specialists and their geographic distribution were tabulated. Reimbursement data were gathered using the Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool and adjusted for inflation using the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Price Index Inflation calculator. RESULTS: The neuroendovascular workforce in 2013 and 2019, respectively, was as follows: radiologists (46% vs 44%), neurosurgeons (45% vs 35%), and neurologists (9% vs 21%). Neurologists increased proportionally (p=0.03). Overall procedure numbers increased across each specialty: radiology (360%; p=0.02), neurosurgery (270%; p<0.01), and neurology (1070%; p=0.03). Neuroendovascular revascularization (CPT 61645) increased in all fields: radiology (170%; p<0.01), neurosurgery (280%; p<0.01), neurology (240%; p<0.01); central nervous system (CNS) permanent occlusion/embolization (CPT61624) in neurosurgery (67%; p=0.03); endovascular temporary balloon artery occlusion (CPT61623) in neurology (29%; p=0.04). In 2019, radiologists were the most common neuroendovascular specialists everywhere except in the Northeast where neurosurgeons predominated. Inflation adjusted reimbursement decreased for endovascular temporary balloon occlusion (CPT61623, -13%; p=0.01), CNS transcatheter permanent occlusion or embolization (CPT61624, -13%; p=0.02), non-CNS transcatheter permanent occlusion or embolization (CPT61626, -12%; p<0.01), and intracranial stent placement (CPT61635, -12%; p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The number of neuroendovascular procedures and specialists increased, with neurologists becoming more predominant. Reimbursement decreased. Coordination among neuroendovascular specialists in terms of training and practice location may maximize access to acute care.

Health Care Expenditures Associated with Delayed Cerebral Ischemia Following Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Propensity-Adjusted Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The additional hospital costs associated with delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) have not been well investigated in prior literature. In this study, the total hospital cost of DCI in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemmorhage (aSAH) patients treated at a single quaternary center was analyzed. METHODS: All patients in the Post-Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial treated for an aSAH between January 1, 2014, and July 31, 2019, were retrospectively analyzed. DCI was defined as cerebral infarction identified on computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or autopsy after exclusion of procedure-related infarctions. The primary outcome was the difference in total cost (including hospital, discharge facility, and all follow-up) using a propensity-adjusted analysis. Propensity score covariate-adjusted linear regression analysis included age, sex, open versus endovascular treatment, Hunt and Hess score, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score. RESULTS: Of the 391 patients included, 144 (37%) had DCI. Patients with DCI had a significantly greater cost compared to patients without DCI (mean standard deviation $112,081 [$54,022] vs. $86,159 [$38,817]; P < 0.001) and a significantly greater length of stay (21 days [11] vs. 18 days [8], P = 0.003, respectively). In propensity-adjusted linear regression analysis, both DCI (odds ratio, $13,871; 95% confidence interval, $7558-$20,185; P < 0.001) and length of stay (odds ratio, $3815 per day; 95% confidence interval, $3480-$4149 per day; P < 0.001) were found to significantly increase the cost. CONCLUSIONS: The significantly higher costs associated with DCI further support the evidence that adverse effects associated with DCI in aSAH pose a significant burden to the health care system.

Cost Comparison of Microsurgery vs Endovascular Treatment for Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Propensity-Adjusted Analysis.

BACKGROUND: In specialized neurosurgical centers, open microsurgery is routinely performed for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost of endovascular vs microsurgical treatment for aSAH at a single quaternary center. METHODS: All patients undergoing aSAH treatment from July 1, 2014, to July 31, 2019, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped based on primary treatment (microsurgery vs endovascular treatment). The primary outcome was the difference in total cost (including hospital, discharge facility, and all follow-up) using a propensity-adjusted analysis. RESULTS: Of 384 patients treated for an aSAH, 234 (61%) were microsurgically treated and 150 (39%) were endovascularly treated. The mean cost of index hospitalization for these patients was marginally higher ($9504) for endovascularly treated patients ($103 980) than for microsurgically treated patients ($94 476) ( P = .047). For the subset of patients with follow-up data available, the mean total cost was $45 040 higher for endovascularly treated patients ($159 406, n = 59) than that for microsurgically treated patients ($114 366, n = 105) ( P < .001). After propensity scoring (adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, Glasgow Coma Scale score, Hunt and Hess grade, Fisher grade, aneurysms, and type/size/location), linear regression analysis of patients with follow-up data available revealed that microsurgery was independently associated with healthcare costs that were $37 244 less than endovascular treatment costs ( P < .001). An itemized cost analysis suggested that this discrepancy was due to differences in the rates of aneurysm retreatment and long-term surveillance. CONCLUSION: Microsurgical treatment for aSAH is associated with lower total healthcare costs than endovascular therapy. Aneurysm surveillance after endovascular treatments, retreatment, and device costs warrants attention in future studies.

Comparative Anatomical Assessment of Full vs Limited Transcavernous Exposure of the Carotid-Oculomotor Window.

BACKGROUND: Although the full transcavernous approach affords extensive mobilization of the oculomotor nerve (OMN) for exposure of the basilar apex and interpeduncular cistern region, this time-consuming procedure requires substantial dural dissection along the anterior middle cranial fossa. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the extent to which limited middle fossa dural elevation affects the carotid-oculomotor window (C-OMW) surgical area during transcavernous exposure after OMN mobilization. METHODS: Four cadaveric specimens were dissected bilaterally to study the C-OMW area afforded by the transcavernous exposure. Each specimen underwent full and limited transcavernous exposure and anterior clinoidectomy (1 procedure per side; 8 procedures). Limited exposure was defined as a dural elevation confined to the cavernous sinus. Full exposure included dural elevation over the gasserian ganglion, extending to the middle meningeal artery and lateral middle cranial fossa. RESULTS: The C-OMW area achieved with the limited transcavernous exposure, compared with full transcavernous exposure, provided significantly less total area with OMN mobilization (22 ± 6 mm2 vs 52 ± 26 mm2, P = .03) and a smaller relative increase in area after OMN mobilization (11 ± 5 mm2 vs 36 ± 13 mm2, P = .03). The increase after OMN mobilization in the C-OMW area after OMN mobilization was 136% ± 119% with a limited exposure vs 334% ± 216% with a full exposure. CONCLUSION: In this anatomical study, the full transcavernous exposure significantly improved OMN mobilization and C-OMW area compared with a limited transcavernous exposure. If a transcavernous exposure is pursued, the difference in the carotid-oculomotor operative corridor area achieved with a limited vs full exposure should be considered.

Total 1-year hospital cost of middle meningeal artery embolization compared to surgery for chronic subdural hematomas: a propensity-adjusted analysis.

BACKGROUND: Middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization results in fewer treatment failures than surgical evacuation for chronic subdural hematomas (cSDHs). We compared the total 1-year hospital cost for MMA embolization versus surgical evacuation for patients with cSDH. METHODS: Data for patients who presented with cSDHs from January 1, 2018, through May 31, 2020, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped by initial treatment (surgery vs MMA embolization), and total hospital cost was obtained. A propensity-adjusted analysis was performed. The primary outcome was difference in mean hospital cost between treatments. RESULTS: Of 170 patients, 48 (28%) underwent embolization and 122 (72%) underwent surgery. cSDHs were larger in the surgical (20.5 (6.7) mm) than in the embolization group (16.9 (4.6) mm; P<0.001); and index hospital length of stay was longer in the surgical group (9.8 (7.0) days) than in the embolization group (5.7 (2.4) days; P<0.001). More patients required additional hematoma treatment in the surgical cohort (16%) than in the embolization cohort (4%; P=0.03), and more required readmission in the surgical cohort (28%) than in the embolization cohort (13%; P=0.04). After propensity adjustment, MMA embolization was associated with a lower total hospital cost compared to surgery (mean difference -$32 776; 95% CI -$52 766 to -$12 787; P<0.001). A propensity-adjusted linear regression analysis found that unexpected additional treatment was the only significant contributor to total hospital cost (mean difference $96 357; 95% CI $73 886 to $118 827; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MMA embolization is associated with decreased total hospital cost compared with surgery for cSDHs. This lower cost is directly related to the decreased need for additional treatment interventions.

Trends in Neurosurgical Practice Size: Increased Consolidation 2014-2019.

BACKGROUND: Practice consolidation in healthcare has widespread consequences for providers and patients. Although many studies describe this phenomenon in various medical specialties, no such analysis has been performed in neurosurgery specifically. The goal of this study was to assess the trends in the size of U.S. neurosurgery practices over a 5-year period. METHODS: Neurosurgery practice characteristics were obtained from the Medicare Physician Compare database from March 2014 through October 2019 on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Website. Neurosurgeons were separated on the basis of their practice size. Group practice sizes ranged from solo practitioner practice to large multispecialty groups and health organizations. Eight groups were identified (1 or 2, 3-9, 10-24, 25-49, 50-99, 100-499, 500-999, and ≥1000 members). Additionally, neurosurgery practices were analyzed across the 4 U.S. geographical regions to understand changes in practice size and distribution. RESULTS: The percentage of neurosurgeons in smaller practices of 1 or 2 members decreased, from 20.09% to 13.05%; 3-9 members, from 17.79% to 9.41%; and 10-24 members, from 10.53% to 8.0%. The largest increase was seen in health organizations of 1000 members or more, with an increase from 9.85% to 22.84%. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that over the past 5 years, a substantial trend toward increasing practice sizes has evolved. The effect of the differences in practice size should be examined to determine the large-scale impacts on patient care, payment models, and healthcare access, in addition to neurosurgeon compensation, and satisfaction.

Propensity-adjusted cost analysis of radial versus femoral access for neuroendovascular procedures.

BACKGROUND: Transradial artery (TRA) access for neuroendovascular procedures is associated with fewer complications than transfemoral artery (TFA) access. This study compares hospital costs associated with TRA access to those associated with TFA access for neurointerventions. METHODS: Elective neuroendovascular procedures at a single center were retrospectively analyzed from October 1, 2018 to May 31, 2019. Hospital costs for each procedure were obtained from the hospital financial department. The primary outcome was the difference in the mean hospital costs after propensity adjustment between patients who underwent TRA compared with TFA access. RESULTS: Of the 338 elective procedures included, 63 (19%) were performed through TRA versus 275 (81%) through TFA access. Diagnostic procedures were more common in the TRA cohort (51 of 63, 81%) compared with the TFA cohort (197 of 275, 72%), but the difference was not significant (p=0.48). The TRA cohort had a shorter length of hospital stay (mean (SD) 0.3 (0.5) days) compared with the TFA cohort (mean 0.7 (1.3) days; p=0.02) and lower hospital costs (mean $12 968 ($6518) compared with the TFA cohort (mean $17 150 ($10 946); p=0.004). After propensity adjustment for age, sex, symptoms, angiographic findings, procedure type, sheath size, and catheter size, TRA access was associated with a mean hospital cost of $2514 less than that for TFA access (95% CI -$4931 to -$97; p=0.04). CONCLUSION: Neuroendovascular procedures performed through TRA access are associated with lower hospital costs than TFA procedures. The lower cost is likely due to a decreased length of hospital stay for TRA.

Doing More with Less: A Minimally Invasive, Cost-Conscious Approach to Stereoelectroencephalography.

BACKGROUND: Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is a commonly used technique for mapping the epileptogenic zone before epilepsy surgery. Many SEEG depth electrode implantation techniques involve the use of extensive technological equipment and shaving of the patient's entire head before electrode implantation. Our goal was to evaluate an SEEG depth electrode implantation technique that used readily available cost-effective neurosurgical equipment, was minimally invasive in nature, and required negligible hair shaving. METHODS: Data on demographic characteristics, operative time, hemorrhagic complications, implantation complications, infection, morbidity, and mortality among patients who underwent this procedure were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Between April 2016 and March 2018, 23 patients underwent implantation of 213 depth electrodes with use of this technique. Mean (SD) operative time was 123 (32) minutes (range, 66-181 minutes). A mean (SD) of 9.3 (1.4) electrodes were placed for each patient (range, 8-13 electrodes). Two of the 213 electrodes (0.9%) were associated with postimplantation asymptomatic hemorrhage. One of the 213 electrodes (0.5%) was placed extradurally or incorrectly. None of the 213 electrodes was associated with symptomatic complications. No patients experienced infectious complications at any point in the preoperative, perioperative, or postoperative stages. CONCLUSIONS: This minimally invasive, cost-effective technique for SEEG depth electrode implantation is a safe, efficient method that uses readily available basic neurosurgical equipment. This technique may be useful in neurosurgery centers with more limited resources. This study suggests that leaving the patient's hair largely intact throughout the procedure does not pose an additional infection risk.

Laparoscopic-Assisted Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement and Reduction in Operative Time and Total Hospital Charges.

OBJECTIVE: In ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement, distal placement of the peritoneal catheter will typically be performed by a neurosurgeon. More recently, laparoscopic-assisted (LA) placement of the distal peritoneal catheter by general surgeons has become common. The present study examined whether LA placement of a VPS (LAVPS) is associated with a reduced operative time, lower hospital costs, and fewer distal revisions. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of the data from all patients who had received a new VPS at our institution from 2013 to 2016. Age, sex, diagnosis, previous abdominal surgery, operative time, anesthesia grade, incidence of 30-day shunt failure, and total hospital charges were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 680 patients had undergone first-time VPS placement, including 199 with LAVPS and 481 with non-LAVPS placement (non-LAVPS). The mean age of the LAVPS patients was significantly older than that of the non-LAVPS patients (64.1 vs. 59.3 years; P = 0.002). The mean operative time was shorter in the LAVPS group than in the non-LAVPS group (55 vs. 75 minutes; P < 0.001). Distal shunt revision within 30 days occurred more often for the non-LAVPS patients (6 of 481 [1.2%]) than for the LAVPS patients (0 of 199 [0%]). A subset analysis of patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus found decreased total hospital charges in the LAVPS group ($67,124 vs. $80,890; P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with non-LAVPS, LAVPS was associated with significantly shorter operative times and fewer distal shunt revisions within 30 days. The findings from a subset analysis supported a decrease in total hospital charges. Additional studies are needed; however, these data suggest that LAVPS is a safer, less-expensive alternative to non-LAVPS.

Clinical and Economic Impact of Duplicated Radiographic Studies in Trauma Patients Transferred to a Regional Trauma Center.

OBJECTIVES: Many trauma patients are evaluated at community hospitals and rural emergency departments before transfer to regional trauma centers. Radiographic studies are often duplicated, leading to significant additional costs to the healthcare system. Our purpose is to identify the reasons for duplicate studies, the costs associated with this practice, and potential clinical effects to patients. METHODS: The institutional trauma database was queried to identify patients with orthopaedic injuries transferred to our regional trauma center. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, referring hospital, reason for transfer, payor source, injury severity score, and Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) were recorded. Duplicate imaging studies were identified and confirmed with each outlying hospital radiology department. The radiation exposure was estimated based on average reported values. The cost of duplicated studies was derived from the Medicare fee schedule. RESULTS: In 1 calendar year, a total of 513 patients were accepted in transfer from 36 outlying facilities. Almost half of the patients (47.7%) had at least 1 radiographic study repeated. There was a significant association between repeated study and age (P < 0.0001), Injury Severity Score (P < 0.0001), and GCS (P < 0.0001). No association was identified for size of transferring institution, injury mechanism, or payor status. Reasons listed for duplication included inadequate data transfer, poor quality, inadequate study, and physician preference. The additional cost to the healthcare system is estimated to be $94,000. CONCLUSIONS: The duplication of imaging studies at regional trauma centers is a common problem that represents a significant opportunity for cost savings and reduction of patient exposure to radiation by implementing imaging protocols at outlying facilities and improving the transfer of imaging data through information technology solutions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.