The importance of patient-centred care to overcome barriers in the management of actinic keratosis.

Visible actinic keratosis (AK) lesions and subclinical (non-visible) sun damage in the field of cancerization are associated with risk of both non-melanoma skin cancer, including basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and, more rarely, melanoma. As the incidences of AK and skin cancer are increasing, effective prevention and treatment of AK is essential to minimize disease burden and improve patient quality of life. Currently, AK lesions are often left untreated and field therapies are underused. Patient-centred care, with a focus on the patient-physician relationship, has proven cost-effective, and improved clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction in a number of therapy areas. Strategies for applying patient-centred care to AK are warranted. Existing barriers to the effective treatment of AK were identified and patient-centric strategies to overcome each barrier were discussed. Barriers to effective AK treatment include poor disease awareness (for both patient and physician), concerns associated with the cosmetic effects of treatment, treatment-related side effects, cost perceptions for lesion-directed vs field-directed therapies, and inadequate adherence, particularly with long treatment duration. Overcoming these barriers will involve patient and physician education that promotes: disease prevention and awareness; the importance of self-examination; an understanding of treatment options; and the importance of adherence to treatment. To maximize its effectiveness, education should be delivered within a patient-centric framework, where the relationship between patient and physician is built on effective communication, empathy and a feeling of partnership. Patient-centric care, including patient education, is key to overcoming the barriers associated with effective AK treatment.

Current application of National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance in the management of patients with severe psoriasis: a clinical audit against NICE guidance in seven National Health Service specialist dermatology units in England.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis affects 1-2% of the U.K. population, with 20-30% of those affected having severe psoriasis managed with systemic therapies. Biological agents are a useful option when other systemic therapies have failed. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the U.K. has published three sets of guidance relating to the use of biological agents. AIM: To establish whether biological agents were being used in line with NICE guidance. METHODS: The study was conducted in seven specialist dermatology units, and involved the retrospective collection of data from patients treated with biological agents since the introduction of the NICE guidance. RESULTS: In total, 176 patients with 212 episodes of treatment were included in the study. Biologics were started for appropriately severe disease in 85% of cases (n = 180) and only after failure, intolerance or contraindication to standard systemic therapies in 97% of cases (n = 206). Etanercept was discontinued appropriately in responders before week 24 in only 12% (five of 60 responders). Across all agents, 40% (72 of 178 with continuity status) were continued on treatment despite not achieving an adequate response according to NICE criteria. CONCLUSIONS: In the seven sites audited, compliance with national guidance was entirely appropriate in terms of therapy initiation; however, the requirement to discontinue etanercept in responders was rarely followed. Similarly, discontinuation of biologicals in nonresponders was not routine practice. This may indicate a reluctance of both patients and clinicians to withdraw an at least partly effective therapy from these refractory patients.