Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
PLoS One ; 15(1): e0227772, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31978169

RESUMO

Non-implanted central vascular catheters (CVC) are frequently required for therapy in hospitalized patients with hematological malignancies or solid tumors. However, CVCs may represent a source for bloodstream infections (central line-associated bloodstream infections, CLABSI) and, thus, may increase morbidity and mortality of these patients. A retrospective cohort study over 3 years was performed. Risk factors were determined and evaluated by a multivariable logistic regression analysis. Healthcare costs of CLABSI were analyzed in a matched case-control study. In total 610 patients got included with a CLABSI incidence of 10.6 cases per 1,000 CVC days. The use of more than one CVC per case, CVC insertion for conditioning for stem cell transplantation, acute myeloid leukemia, leukocytopenia (≤ 1000/µL), carbapenem therapy and pulmonary diseases were independent risk factors for CLABSI. Hospital costs directly attributed to the onset of CLABSI were 8,810 € per case. CLABSI had a significant impact on the overall healthcare costs. Knowledge about risk factors and infection control measures for CLABSI prevention is crucial for best clinical practice.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Bacteriemia/economia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/economia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/microbiologia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentação , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Infecção Hospitalar/economia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Feminino , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29312658

RESUMO

Background: Nosocomial infections due to vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) have become a major problem during the last years. The purpose of this study was to investigate the economic burden of nosocomial VRE infections in a European university hospital. Methods: A retrospective matched case-control study was performed including patients who acquired nosocomial infection with either VRE or vancomycin-susceptible enterococci (VSE) within a time period of 3 years. 42 cases with VRE infections and 42 controls with VSE infections were matched for age, gender, admission and discharge within the same year, time at risk for infection, Charlson comorbidity index (±1), stay on intensive care units and non-intensive care units as well as for the type of infection, using criteria of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Results: The median overall costs per case were significantly higher than for controls (EUR 57,675 vs. EUR 38,344; p = 0.030). Costs were similar between cases and controls before onset of infection (EUR 17,893 vs. EUR 16,600; p = 0.386), but higher after onset of infection (EUR 37,971 vs. EUR 23,025; p = 0.049). The median attributable costs per case for vancomycin-resistance were EUR 13,157 (p = 0.036). The most significant differences in costs between cases and controls turned out to be for pharmaceuticals (EUR 6030 vs. EUR 2801; p = 0.008) followed by nursing staff (EUR 8956 vs. EUR 4621; p = 0.032), medical products (EUR 3312 vs. EUR 1838; p = 0.020), and for assistant medical technicians (EUR 3766 vs. EUR 2474; p = 0.023). Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed that costs were driven independently by vancomycin-resistance (1.4 fold; p = 0.034). Conclusions: This analysis suggested that nosocomial VRE infections significantly increases hospital costs compared with VSE infections. Therefore, hospital personal should implement control measures to prevent VRE transmission.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/epidemiologia , Enterococos Resistentes à Vancomicina/isolamento & purificação , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Comorbidade , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/transmissão , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/transmissão , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tamanho da Amostra , Enterococos Resistentes à Vancomicina/efeitos dos fármacos
3.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 396(4): 453-9, 2011 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21404004

RESUMO

PURPOSES: Unfortunately, surgical site infections (SSIs) are a quite common complication and represent one of the major causes of postoperative morbidity and mortality, and may furthermore lead to enormous additional costs for hospitals and health care systems. METHODS: In order to determine the estimated costs due to SSIs, a MEDLINE search was performed to identify articles that provide data on economic aspects of SSIs and compared to findings from a matched case-control study on costs of SSIs after coronary bypass grafting (CABG) in a German tertiary care university hospital. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies on costs were found. The additional costs of SSI vary between $3,859 (mean) and $40,559 (median). Median costs of a single CABG case in the recently published study were $49,449 (€36,261) vs. $18,218 (€13,356) in controls lacking infection (p < 0.0001). The median reimbursement from health care insurance companies was $36,962 (€27,107) leading to a financial loss of $12,482 (€9,154) each. CONCLUSION: Costs of SSIs may almost triple the individual overall health care costs and those additional charges may not be sufficiently covered. Appropriate measures to reduce SSI rates must be taken to improve the patient's safety. This should also diminish costs for health care systems which benefits the entire community.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/economia , Cuidados Críticos/economia , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia
4.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 37(4): 893-6, 2010 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19896860

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Surgical-site infections are a very expensive complication in cardiac surgery. Thus, the total costs for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery may substantially increase when a deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) occurs. This may be due to an extended length of stay (LOS), the need for additional surgical procedures, vacuum-assisted wound dressing and antibiotic therapy. This study compares the LOS in the hospital and on an intensive care unit (ICU) as well as the total costs for patients undergoing CABG depending upon the occurrence of a subsequent DSWI. METHODS: A case-control study was performed. Total costs of DSWI cases were analysed and compared to patients undergoing CABG without DSWI. Inclusion criterion for cases was the development of a DSWI according to the CDC criteria during hospital stay after CABG. Two control patients without any signs or symptoms of an infection during hospital stay were matched to each case by (1) type of surgery according to their diagnosis-related group (DRG), (2) age +/-5 years, (3) gender and (4) duration of preoperative hospital stay +/-2 days, but at least as long as the time at risk of cases before infection. RESULTS: Between January 2006 and March 2008, 17 CABG patients with DSWI (cases) and 34 matched controls were included. The median overall costs of a CABG case were 36,261 Euro compared with 13,356 Euro per control patient without infection (p<0.0001). The median overall LOS was 34.4 days versus 16.5 days, respectively (p=0.0006). The median LOS on ICU was 6.3 days versus 5.3 days (no significant difference). CONCLUSION: DSWI represents an important economic factor for the hospital as they may almost triple the costs for patients undergoing CABG. Thus, appropriate infection control measures for the prevention of DSWI should be enforced.


Assuntos
Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Esterno/cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/economia , Idoso , Comorbidade , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/economia , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA