Interrater reliability of the Standing and Walking Assessment Tool for spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Psychometric study. OBJECTIVES: The Standing and Walking Assessment Tool (SWAT) is a standardized approach to the evaluation of standing and walking capacity following traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) in Canada. The SWAT classifies individuals with a tSCI into 12 stages of standing and walking capacity that are paired with well-established outcome measures, such as the Berg Balance Scale and 10-m Walk Test. Prior research has demonstrated the validity and responsiveness of the SWAT stages; however, the reliability remains unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the interrater reliability of the SWAT stages. SETTING: Inpatient units of two Canadian rehabilitation hospitals. METHODS: Adults with sub-acute tSCI were recruited. SWAT stage was evaluated for each participant by two physical therapists separately. The two therapists aimed to complete the evaluations within one day of each other. To evaluate interrater reliability, the percentage agreement between the SWAT stages rated by the two physical therapists was calculated, along with a linear weighted kappa statistic with a 95% CI. RESULTS: Forty-five individuals with sub-acute tSCI (36 males, 9 females, mean (SD) age of 54.8 (17.9) years) participated. The percentage agreement in SWAT stages between the two physical therapists was 75.6%. A kappa statistic of 0.93 with a 95% CI, 0.81-1.05 was obtained. In cases where therapists disagreed (18% of participants), therapists differed by 1-2 stages only. CONCLUSIONS: The SWAT stages have high interrater reliability, providing further support for the use of the SWAT in rehabilitation practice in Canada.

Validity and responsiveness of the Standing and Walking Assessment Tool for sub-acute traumatic spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective longitudinal study. OBJECTIVE: The Standing and Walking Assessment Tool (SWAT) combines stages of standing and walking recovery (SWAT stages) with established measures (Berg Balance Scale (BBS), 10-m walk test (10MWT), 6-min walk test (6MWT), and modified Timed Up-and-Go (mTUG)). We evaluated the SWAT's validity (known-groups and convergent) and responsiveness among inpatients with sub-acute, traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: Ten Canadian rehabilitation hospitals. METHODS: Upon admission, SWAT stage and core measures (BBS, 10MWT, 6MWT, and mTUG), International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI sensory and motor scores, and Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM) were collected from 618 adults with SCI. Known-groups validity was evaluated by comparing SWAT stage distributions across American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) classification. Convergent validity was evaluated by correlating SWAT stages with scores on other measures using Spearman's rho. The SWAT (stage and core measures) was re-administered at discharge. To evaluate responsiveness, SWAT stages at admission and discharge were compared. The standardized response mean (SRM) was used to evaluate the responsiveness of core SWAT measures. RESULTS: The SWAT stage distribution of participants with AIS D injuries differed from those of participants with AIS A-C injuries (p ≤ 0.002). SWAT stages correlated strongly with BBS and motor scores (ρ = 0.778-0.836), and moderately with SCIM, mTUG, 10MWT, 6MWT, and sensory scores (ρ = 0.409-0.692). Discharge SWAT stage was greater than the admission stage (p < 0.0001). The BBS was the most responsive core SWAT measure (SRM = 1.26). CONCLUSIONS: The SWAT is a valid and responsive approach to the measurement of standing and walking ability during sub-acute SCI.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Management of Distal Ureteral Stones in Children.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the most cost-effective approach to the management of distal ureteral stones in children given the potential for recurrent renal colic during a trial of passage versus potential stent discomfort and complications of ureteroscopy. METHODS: We developed a decision tree to project costs and clinical outcomes associated with observation, medical explusive therapy (MET), and ureteroscopy for the management of an index patient with a 4-mm-distal ureteral stone. We determined which strategy would be least costly and offer the most pain-free days within 30days of diagnosis. We performed a one-way sensitivity analysis on the probability of successful stone passage with MET. We obtained probabilities from the literature and costs from the 2016 Pediatric Health Information System Database. RESULTS: Ureteroscopy was the costliest strategy but maximized the number of pain-free days within 30days of diagnosis ($5282/29 pain-free days). MET was less costly than ureteroscopy but also less effective ($615/21.8 pain-free days). Observation cost more than MET and was also less effective ($2139/15.5 pain-free days). The one-way sensitivity analysis on the probability of successful stone passage with MET demonstrated that ureteroscopy always has the highest net monetary benefits value and is therefore the recommended strategy given a fixed willingness-to-pay. DISCUSSION: Using a rigorous decision-science approach, we found that ureteroscopy is the recommended strategy in children with small distal ureteral stones. Although it costs more than MET, it resulted in more pain-free days in the first 30days following diagnosis given the faster resolution of the stone episode.