Eltrombopag as frontline treatment of aplastic anaemia in routine practice: implications on cost and efficacy.

The thrombopoietin mimetic eltrombopag (EPAG) is efficacious in clinical trials of newly diagnosed moderate (M), severe (S) and very severe (vS) aplastic anaemia (AA). Its use in routine practice and resource-constrained settings is not well described. Twenty-five men and 38 women at a median age of 54 (18-86) years with newly diagnosed AA treated consecutively in a 7-year period with EPAG (N = 6), EPAG/cyclosporine (CsA) (N = 33) and EPAG/CsA/anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) (N = 24) were analyzed. Because EPAG was not reimbursed, peak doses ranged from 25 to 200 mg/day depending on affordability. EPAG/CsA-treated patients were older (median age: 61 years) with less severe AA (MAA, N = 15; SAA, N = 14; vSAA, N = 4), whereas EPAG/CsA/ATG-treated patients were younger (median age: 44 years) with more severe AA (MAA, N = 2; SAA, N = 12, vSAA, N = 10). The overall/trilineage response rates were 83%/50% for EPAG-treated patients; 79%/42% for EPAG/CsA-treated patients and 75%/63% for EPAG/CsA/ATG-treated patients. Adverse events included grade 1 liver derangement (N = 7) and grade 1 dyspepsia (N = 3). The 5-year overall survivals/failure-free survivals were 62%/80% for the entire cohort; 55%/75% for EPAG/CsA-treated patients and 82%/78% for EPAG/CsA/ATG-treated patients. EPAG showed robust efficacy in AA in routine practice. However, EPAG dosage and combinations remain to be optimized for AA of different severities.

Posaconazole vs fluconazole or itraconazole for prevention of invasive fungal diseases in patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome: a cost-effectiveness analysis in an Asian teaching hospital.

BACKGROUND: Posaconazole is superior to fluconazole/itraconazole in preventing invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) in neutropenic patients. Whether the higher cost of posaconazole is offset by decreases in IFDs in a given institute requires cost-effective analysis encompassing the spectrum of IFDs and socioeconomic factors specific to that geographic area. METHODS: This study performed a cost-effective analysis of posaconazole prophylaxis for IFDs in an Asian teaching hospital, employing decision modeling and data of IFDs and medication costs specific to the institute, in neutropenic patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). RESULTS: In the cost-effectiveness analysis, the higher cost of posaconazole was partially offset by a reduction in the cost of treating IFDs that were prevented, resulting in an incremental cost of 125,954 Hong Kong dollars/16,148 USD per IFD avoided. Over a lifetime horizon, assuming same case fatality rate of IFDs in both groups, use of posaconazole results in 0.07 discounted life years saved. This corresponds to an incremental cost of 116,023 HKD/14,875 USD per life year saved. This incremental cost per life year saved in posaconazole prophylaxis fulfilled the World Health Organization defined threshold for cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Posaconazole prophylaxis was cost-effective in Hong Kong.