Cost benefit analysis and pathology review of ileostomy and colostomy specimens processed over a 20-year period.

Rising healthcare costs have been linked to overtreatment and overuse of available resources. Identifying and eliminating low-value services is vital for reducing such costs. At many institutions, including ours, all ileostomy and colostomy specimens are sent for pathological evaluation. It is estimated that approximately 120,000 ileostomy/colostomy procedures are done every year, and at least 1 million patients have stomas at any given time in North America. Hence, we decided to analyze the pathological findings and cost-benefit of undertaking the pathological evaluation of these colostomy and ileostomy specimens. The pathology database of our department was searched for all ileostomy and colostomy specimens received between 2000 and 2020, resulting in a total of 2762 cases (1944 ileostomy and 818 colostomy). We performed a cost-benefit analysis and pathologic review of these cases. The results of our study show that 99.38% of these specimens did not show any significant pathological abnormality, and non-neoplastic pathologic findings accounted for 99.63% of cases. Less than 1% of our cases showed any clinically significant pathological findings. All 10 cases that showed a neoplastic or malignant diagnosis showed some abnormal finding that was appreciated at the time of gross examination. We conclude that microscopic evaluation of ileostomy and colostomy specimens incurs significant costs and provides no clear value or relevant information for patient care. The results of our study provide support for ileostomy and colostomy specimens to be triaged by gross-only pathological examination in the first instance for the vast majority of cases.

Usefulness of core roll preparations in immediate assessment of neoplastic lung lesions: comparison to conventional CT scan-guided lung fine-needle aspiration cytology.

INTRODUCTION: CT scan-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of lung nodules is a well-established diagnostic technique. In our institution, both FNA and tissue core biopsy (using a 20-gauge needle) under CT scan guidance are routinely performed during the same procedure, and a preliminary diagnosis (an immediate assessment) is rendered. We compared core roll preparations (CRPs) with aspirate smears in the immediate assessment of pulmonary lesions and also assessed whether CRP resulted in the alteration of the histopathology of the core biopsy. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-five cases of neoplastic pulmonary lesions diagnosed in CT scan-guided lung FNA specimens, with core biopsies performed sequentially at the same visit for each patient, were evaluated. CRPs were made by lightly rolling the tissue core on a glass slide, followed by air-drying. Only stained slides (Diff-Quik; Mercedes Medical; Sarasota, FL) were reviewed, and were scored for cellularity and morphology. RESULTS: CRPs in seven cases (28%) scored more diagnostic points than FNA smears, and were found to be better for cellularity and morphology compared to the corresponding FNA smears. The FNA smears scored more than CRPs in 10 cases (40%), while in 8 cases (32%) both CRPs and FNA smears scored equal diagnostic points. Using both CRP and FNA smears in the immediate assessment of lung biopsy specimens, we could assign a specific malignant histologic cell type in 23 of 25 cases (92%). In comparison, if the FNA smears were evaluated alone, we could assign a specific malignant histologic cell type in only 16 of 25 cases (64%). The CRP did not alter the histopathology of the core biopsy specimens in any of the above cases. CONCLUSION: The CRP complements the CT scan-guided lung FNA procedure in the immediate assessment of neoplastic lung lesions without altering the histopathology of core biopsy specimens.