Home Smoking Bans and Urinary NNAL Levels to Measure Tobacco Smoke Exposure in Chinese American Household Pairs.

Home smoking bans can reduce tobacco smoke exposure, but little is known about the impact for Chinese American household pairs. In this study of 202 household pairs with low acculturation, 53.9% reported a home smoking ban, 31.7% had inconsistent reports, and 14.4% reported no ban. With decreasing home smoking ban enforcement, more nonsmokers had tobacco smoke exposure (66.1%-86.2%) as measured by the tobacco-specific nitrosamine biomarker urine NNAL (4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol). Despite reported bans, about one-quarter of nonsmokers still reported tobacco smoke exposure at home (23.6%-30%) within the past 2 months and three-quarters reported outdoor exposure. In adjusted regression analyses of geometric mean NNAL ratios, nonsmokers in households with no ban had over two times higher levels than nonsmokers in households with a ban: adjusted log NNAL ratio = 2.70 (95% CI 1.21, 6.03). Higher smoker NNAL level and nonsmoker English fluency were also significantly associated with nonsmoker NNAL levels. Nonsmoker levels in households with an inconsistent ban were not significantly different compared to those with a ban. Although home smoking bans were generally associated with lower NNAL levels, tobacco smoke exposure in this immigrant population with low English proficiency was higher than that of the general population. From a health equity standpoint, there is a need for broader implementation and enforcement of comprehensive smoke-free policies.

Differences Between Current and Desired Physician Hypertension Management Roles Among Chinese American Seniors: a Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Though patient-physician racial concordance correlates with better perceived shared decision-making, Chinese immigrants report low quality of care and have undertreated hypertension regardless of concordance. OBJECTIVE: To inform efforts to change physician behavior and improve quality of hypertension care, we used role theory to explore differences between Chinese American seniors' descriptions of current and desired physician roles in hypertension management. DESIGN: Qualitative interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Immigrant Chinese Americans with hypertension age ≥ 65 years in Los Angeles County. APPROACH: We recruited 15 participants from a senior wellness center for language-matched interviews and blood pressure (BP) checks. Participants described current and desired physician activities for hypertension management. Bilingual research assistants translated audio recordings. Using thematic analysis, a three-member team independently reviewed and coded transcripts to identify themes regarding physician roles in hypertension management; discrepancies were discussed to achieve consensus. Themes were checked for validity in four subsequent focus groups. RESULTS: We completed interviews in 2014. Interviewees' mean age was 70.6 years; seven were female and five had a systolic BP over 150 mmHg. All interviewees reported having race- and language-concordant primary care providers, were prescribed at least one BP medication, and had Medicare. Three major themes encompassed current and desired physician roles in hypertension management: technical expert, empathetic health steward, and health educator. Descriptions of current and desired physician roles differed for all themes, most prominently for empathetic health steward and health educator. Participants desired but did not consistently experience interpersonal engagement or receive hypertension lifestyle counseling, citing visit time pressures. CONCLUSIONS: Among these Chinese American seniors, there remains a gap between current and desired physician roles in hypertension management, particularly interpersonal behaviors and education. Seniors deprioritized these roles in response to perceived physician role strain. Increased attention to the impact of perceived physician role strain might improve shared decision-making and hypertension management.

Characterizing Beliefs about Stroke and Walking for Exercise among Seniors from Four Racial/Ethnic Minority Communities.

We described and compared seniors' stroke-related health beliefs among four racial/ethnic communities to inform a culturally-tailored stroke prevention walking intervention. Specific attention was paid to how seniors combined pathophysiology-based biomedical beliefs with non-biomedical beliefs. We conducted twelve language-concordant, structured focus groups with African American, Chinese American, Korean American, and Latino seniors aged 60 years and older with a history of hypertension (n = 132) to assess stroke-related health beliefs. Participants were asked their beliefs about stroke mechanism and prevention strategies in addition to questions corresponding to four constructs from the Health Belief Model: perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, and benefits and barriers to walking for exercise. Using thematic analysis, we iteratively reviewed and coded focus group transcripts to identify recurrent themes within and between racial/ethnic groups. Participants across all four racial/ethnic groups believed that blockages in brain arteries caused strokes. Factors believed to increase susceptibility to stroke were often similar to biomedical risk factors across racial/ethnic groups, but participants also endorsed non-biomedical factors such as strong emotions. The majority of participants perceived stroke as a serious condition requiring urgent medical attention, fearing paralysis or death, but few mentioned severe disability as a stroke consequence. Participants largely believed stroke to be preventable through physical activity, dietary changes, and medication adherence. Perceived benefits of walking for exercise included improved physical health, decreased bodily pain, and ease of participation. Perceived barriers to walking included limited mobility due to chronic medical conditions, increased bodily pain, and low motivation. While seniors' stroke-related health beliefs were often similar to biomedical beliefs across racial/ethnic groups, we also identified several non-biomedical beliefs that were shared across groups. These non-biomedical beliefs regarding perceived stroke susceptibility and severity may warrant further discussion in stroke education interventions. Patterns in non-biomedical beliefs that vary between groups may reflect cultural differences. Stroke education could potentially increase cultural relevancy and impact by addressing such differences in health beliefs as well as perceived benefits and barriers to walking for exercise that vary between different racial/ethnic groups.

Differences in Nursing Home Quality Between Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare Patients.

BACKGROUND: Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollment is steadily growing, but little is known about the quality of nursing home (NH) care provided to MA enrollees compared to enrollees in traditional fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare. OBJECTIVES: To compare MA and FFS enrollees' quality of NH care. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: US nursing homes. PARTICIPANTS: 2.17 million Medicare enrollees receiving care at an NH during 2011. MEASUREMENTS: CMS methodology was used to calculate the 18 Nursing Home Compare quality measures as applicable for each enrollee. RESULTS: Among Medicare enrollees using NH in 2011, 17% were in MA plans. Most quality scores were similar between MA and FFS. After adjusting for facility, beneficiary age and gender, CMS Hierarchical Condition Category score, and geographic region, short-stay MA enrollees had statistically significantly lower rates of new or worsening pressure ulcers [relative risk (RR) = 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.71-0.82] and new antipsychotic use (RR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.80-0.83) but higher rates of moderate to severe pain (RR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.07-1.12), compared with short-stay FFS enrollees. MA long-stay enrollees had lower rates of antipsychotic use (RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.93-0.96) but had higher rates of incontinence (RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.06-1.09) and urinary catheterization (RR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.06-1.13), compared with long-stay FFS enrollees. CONCLUSION: Overall, we found few differences in NH quality scores between MA and FFS Medicare enrollees. MA enrollment was associated with better scores for pressure ulcers and antipsychotic use but worse scores for pain control, incontinence, and urinary catheterization. Results may be limited by residual case-mix differences between MA and FFS patients or by the small number of short-stay measures reported.