RESUMO
Introduction: Individuals with gender dysphoria do not identify with their sex assigned at birth and face societal and cultural challenges, leading to increased risk for depression, anxiety, and suicide. Gender dysphoria is a DSM-5 diagnosis but is not necessary for transition therapy. Additionally, individuals with gender dysphoria or who identify as gender diverse/nonconforming may experience "minority stress" from increased discrimination, leading to a greater risk for mental health problems. This study aimed to identify possible health disparities in patients hospitalized for depression with gender dysphoria across the United States. Depression was selected because patients with gender dysphoria are at an increased risk for it. Various patient and hospital-related factors are explored for their association with changes in healthcare utilization for patients hospitalized with depression. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample was used to identify nationwide patients with depression (n = 378,552, weighted n = 1,892,760) from 2016 to 2019. We then examined the characteristics of the study sample and investigated how individuals' gender dysphoria was associated with healthcare utilization measured by hospital cost per stay. Multivariate survey regression models were used to identify predictors. Results: Among the 1,892,760 total depression inpatient samples, 14,145 (0.7%) patients had gender dysphoria (per ICD-10 codes). Over the study periods, depression inpatients with gender dysphoria increased, but total depression inpatient rates remained stable. Survey regression results suggested that gender dysphoria, minority ethnicity or race, female sex assigned at birth, older ages, and specific hospital regions were associated with higher hospital cost per stay than their reference groups. Sub-group analysis showed that the trend was similar in most racial and regional groups. Conclusion: Differences in hospital cost per stay for depression inpatients with gender dysphoria exemplify how this community has been disproportionally affected by racial and regional biases, insurance denials, and economic disadvantages. Financial concerns can stop individuals from accessing gender-affirming care and risk more significant mental health problems. Increased complexity and comorbidity are associated with hospital cost per stay and add to the cycle.
Assuntos
Depressão , Disforia de Gênero , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Feminino , Masculino , Disforia de Gênero/terapia , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/economiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to identify vulnerable populations at risk of developing decubitus ulcers and their resultant increase in healthcare utilization to promote the use of early prevention methods. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample of the United States was used to identify hospitalized patients across the country who had a length of stay of 5 or more days (N = 9,757,245, weighted N = 48,786,216) from 2016 to 2020. We examined the characteristics of the entire inpatient sample based on the presence of decubitus ulcers, temporal trends, risk of decubitus ulcer development, and its association with healthcare utilization, measured by discounted hospital charges and length of stay. The multivariate survey logistic regression model was used to identify predictors for decubitus ulcer occurrence, and the survey linear regression model was used to measure how decubitus ulcers are associated with healthcare utilization. RESULTS: Among 48,786,216 nationwide inpatients, 3.9% had decubitus ulcers. The percentage of inpatients with decubitus ulcers who subsequently experienced increased healthcare utilization rose with time. The survey logistic regression results indicate that patients who were Black, older, male, or those reliant on Medicare/Medicaid had a statistically significant increased risk of decubitus ulcers. The survey linear regression results demonstrate that inpatients with decubitus ulcers were associated with increased hospital charges and longer lengths of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with government insurance, those of minority races and ethnicities, and those treated in the Northeast and West may be more vulnerable to pressure ulcers and subsequent increased healthcare utilization. Implementation of early prevention methods in these populations is necessary to minimize the risk of developing decubitus ulcers, even if upfront costs may be increased. For example, larger hospitals were found to have a lower risk of decubitus ulcer development but an increased cost of preventative care. Hence, it is imperative to explore and use universal, targeted preventative methods to improve patient safety.
Assuntos
Úlcera por Pressão , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Úlcera por Pressão/epidemiologia , Úlcera por Pressão/prevenção & controle , Pacientes Internados , Medicare , Hospitais , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Tempo de InternaçãoRESUMO
Objective: The primary objective of this study is to conduct a comparative analysis of telemedicine utilization patterns among adult populations residing in both rural and urban areas and evaluate the probability of telemedicine adoption among adults dwelling in both rural and urban areas amid the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Our study has attained sample populations (n = 279,260, National Weighted Estimates = 2,391,188,373) through the secondary analysis of the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) for the year 2021. We examined the relationship between the rural, regional, and racial variables using chi-square tests and binary logistic regression associated with telemedicine use in our multivariable analysis. Results: Telemedicine use by population decreased with decreasing urbanization level, from 40.2% among adults living in large central metropolitan to 29.7% among adults living in rural area (p<0.0001). Regarding household income, adults with 400% or more of the federal poverty level (FPL) were significantly more likely to use telemedicine than adults with less than 100% of the FPL. Females were more likely than males to utilize telemedicine. In terms of region, adults living in the West were 1.25 times more likely to use telemedicine than adults living in the Northeast, and minority race/ethnicity groups (eg, Non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and other) are less likely to use the telemedicine rather than Non-Hispanic White. Conclusion: Health equity is attained when all demographic groups enjoy uniform access to healthcare services, but disparities emerge when there are discernible variations in access to treatment. Considering this study's findings, it becomes evident that the distinctions in poverty rates, median income levels, and healthcare utilization patterns across racial and regional lines may serve as indicators of potential health equity concerns.
RESUMO
Due to the risks involved in not achieving desired health outcomes for the dollar spent on drugs, healthcare decision makers, including payers, providers, drug manufacturers, and patients, need a mechanism to share this financial risk among the involved parties. Performance-based risk-sharing arrangements (PBRSAs) are agreements that can potentially reduce the 'drug lag' in which patients wait for an unknown amount of time until a particular drug is covered under their health plan. In addition, PBRSAs can mitigate the risk of investing heavily in drugs that are ineffective or do not deliver good value or "bang for the buck". This review describes and evaluates PBRSAs for drugs in the USA and juxtaposes to other developed nations (i.e. Germany) that adopted PBRSAs in their healthcare model. There are different types of outcomes-based health schemes, namely conditional coverage, which can be further broken down into coverage with evidence development (CED), conditional treatment continuation (CTC), and performance-linked reimbursement, which includes outcomes guarantees. Both CED and CTC are 'conditional' on the collected evidence of the new drug's effectiveness, offering discount only if the drug delivers desirable results. The outcomes guarantee scheme offers discount or even a full refund if the outcome is less than expected, forcing the drug to meet the expected effectiveness. The USA can follow the German reference pricing model in which the assessment of new drugs is centralized and done collectively by representatives from a group of healthcare decision makers. In any shape or form, PBRSA is a clever mechanism to cope with uncertainty if drug price is scaled appropriately based on value.
Assuntos
Custos de Medicamentos , Preparações Farmacêuticas/economia , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Participação no Risco Financeiro , Alemanha , HumanosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the factors related to potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use in elderly patients with cancer, as well as to compare the PIM prevalence in older adults with and without cancer. METHODS: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare-linked base (2009-2011) were accessed to conduct a retrospective study comparing patients with cancers of the breast, colon/rectum, and prostate against a matched population of subjects without cancer. PIM use was defined based on the 2015 Beers Criteria and was quantified using prescription claims. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the associations between the patients' characteristics, clinical factors, and PIM use in patients with cancer based on Beers criteria. Propensity score matching was applied to compare use of PIM in patients with versus without cancer. RESULTS: PIM usage rates in patients with colorectal and breast cancers were significantly higher than non-cancer-bearing adults; the difference in PIM usage rate was not significantly different in the prostate cancer-matched cohort. The prevalence of inappropriate medication use in the three types of cancers evaluated was directly correlated with number of medications prescribed, treatment with chemotherapy, and co-morbid medical problems. CONCLUSION: Patients diagnosed with cancer were more likely to use PIM compared with their non-cancer counterparts. The updated Beers criteria has the potential to serve as an important tool in geriatric oncology practice but it may still need to take into consideration different cancer types and their respective treatments.
Assuntos
Neoplasias , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropriados , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Prescrição Inadequada , Masculino , Medicare , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine the cumulative effect of pharmacist-led transitions of care on the 30-day all-cause readmission rates of patients with congestive heart failure with the objective to isolate and assess the effect of pharmacy intervention to a condition-specific service. Previous studies that review pharmacist-led transitional care services involve multiple condition-specific services or a pharmacy service integrated into the healthcare team that presents complications in interpreting the independent effectiveness of component services by pharmacy professionals. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using articles identified from MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov databases for studies on congestive heart failure readmission rates based on transitions of care pharmacist services using detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria. Abstracts were screened for outcome of interest and appropriate transitions of care program structure. Practice and patient characteristics were described and compared to identify current practice trends. A meta-analysis was then performed utilizing previously identified studies from systematic analysis that reported the required data to calculate the effect size. Evidence was reviewed and appraised according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. RESULTS: The database search produced 443 potential articles for inclusion. Six articles were identified for inclusion in the systematic review based on abstract screening. Of the six articles included in the systematic review, three studies met inclusion criteria for a meta-analysis. Two studies in the meta-analysis stated a significant reduction in the 30-day all-cause readmission rate for patients with congestive heart failure, while the third depicted a reduction in readmission that was found to be non-significant. The pooled effect of the included articles found that pharmacist-led transitions of care services for patients with congestive heart failure had an increased odds to have lower all-cause readmission rates of patients with congestive heart failure (odds ratio = 2.19, 95% confidence interval 1.50-3.20). Based on the meta-analysis of three studies, pharmacist-led transitions of care services significantly reduced the odds of 30-day all-cause readmission rates in patients with congestive heart failure compared with standard-of-care discharge protocols. CONCLUSION: Results of the meta-analysis demonstrate the capacity for pharmacist-led transitions of care programs to reduce 30-day all-cause readmission rates in patients with congestive heart failure compared with non-pharmacist discharge care. The financial implications of transitions of care pharmacist involvement have yet to be validated. In general, existing database search results highlight the lack of evidence detailing specific clinical outcomes of pharmacist-led transitions of care services in distinct chronic conditions. Future studies may serve to compare patient-centered outcomes between condition-specific services or across disciplines to provide the most cost-effective delivery of care.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Readmissão do Paciente , Farmacêuticos , Doença Crônica , Estudos de Coortes , Análise Custo-Benefício , Atenção à Saúde , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Humanos , Alta do PacienteRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite the introduction of Medicare Part D (MPD) and 2012 Affordable Care Act (ACA), patients have a cost burden due to increases in drug prices. To overcome cost barriers, some patients purchase their medications from Canadian online pharmacies as Canadian prescription drug prices are believed to be lower than US prescription drug prices. The objective of this study was to determine which top 100 Medicare drugs can be imported to the USA legally, and to determine which type of prescription drug would be more beneficial to be purchased from Canadian online pharmacies. Moreover, we also deemed it important to compare MPD beneficiary annual expenses with expenses patients would have when obtaining their prescriptions from Canadian online pharmacies. METHODS: We conducted a cost analysis from a patient perspective. A list of the top 100 Medicare drugs was compiled and information on drug prices was collected from three Canadian online pharmacies and four MPD plans in Virginia. The annual cost of each Medicare drug and percent change between Canadian online pharmacies and MPD were compared. RESULTS: A total of 78 drugs from the top 100 Medicare drugs were included in the final analysis. Seventy-six prescription drugs (97.4%) that could be purchased from Canadian online pharmacies showed a significantly lower average drug price percent change of -72.71% (P < 0.0001). The heart health/blood pressure subgroup had the highest number of drugs that could be purchased from Canadian online pharmacies. CONCLUSION: The majority of prescription drugs can be purchased at lower prices from Canadian online pharmacies when compared to Medicare beneficiaries' potential expenses. Purchasing medications from Canadian online pharmacies may be a viable option to address cost barriers.
Assuntos
Custos de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Disponibilidade de Medicamentos Via Internet/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/economia , Canadá , Custos e Análise de Custo , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Humanos , Seguro de Serviços Farmacêuticos , Medicare , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study were to evaluate and compare medication adherence associated with acne drugs in children and adolescents with acne vulgaris. METHODS: Data from MarketScan Medicaid enrollees with acne vulgaris were included if patients were ages 6 to 17 years on the index date, had at least one acne-related medication claim, and were enrolled in Medicaid during January 2004 to December 2007. The adherence rate was measured using the medication possession ratio. The medication possession ratio was dichotomized to categorize patients as adherent (≥0.8) or nonadherent (<0.8). Multivariate logistic regressions were used for analyses of the medication possession ratio. RESULTS: Of 20,039 eligible patients, 2,860 patients were children and 17,179 patients were adolescent. Approximately 6.96% of children and 16.75% of adolescents had at least one acne-related medication refill. The mean adherence rate to acne medication was significantly different between children (0.22) and adolescents (0.32). In addition, only 3.71% of children were adherent to acne medication while 13.38% of adolescents were adherent. After controlling for covariates, adolescents were 2.06 times more likely to get an acne-related medication refilled and were 2.40 times more likely to be adherent to acne-related medication. The analyses also showed that acne-related medication adherence was associated with the patient's characteristics and acne medication type. CONCLUSION: Neither patient population was considered adherent to acne-related medications, nor was there a significant difference between the two patient populations. This study also revealed that medication type is a contributing factor towards adherence. Health care providers should strive to educate patients on the importance of medication adherence.
Assuntos
Acne Vulgar/tratamento farmacológico , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicaid , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of diabetes mellitus is high among patients with developmental disabilities (cerebral palsy, autism, Down's syndrome and cognitive disabilities). OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the racial health disparities in medication adherence and medication persistence in developmentally disabled adults with type 2 diabetes enrolled in Medicaid. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using the MarketScan(®) Multi-State Medicaid Database. Adults aged 18-64 years with a prior diagnosis of a developmental disability (cerebral palsy/autism/down's/cognitive disabilities) and a new diagnosis of type 2 diabetes enrolled in Medicaid from January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2006, were included. Adults were included if they had a continuous enrollment for at least 12 months and were excluded if they were dual eligible. Anti-diabetes medication adherence and diabetes medication persistence were measured using multivariate logistic regression and the Cox-proportional hazard regression, respectively. RESULTS: The study population comprised of 1529 patients. Although overall diabetes medication adherence in this population was optimal, African Americans had significantly lower odds (25%) of adhering to anti-diabetes medications compared to Caucasians (OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.58-0.97, P < 0.05). Also, after controlling for other covariates, the rate of discontinuation was higher in African Americans compared to Caucasians (hazard ratio = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.91-1.18, P < 0.629). CONCLUSION: In this study, racial disparities were found in anti-diabetes medication adherence among Medicaid enrollees with developmental disabilities (DD). Studies conducted in the future should examine predictors that impact access to care, availability of primary and specialized care, social support as well as beliefs of racial minority populations with developmental disabilities and chronic conditions like diabetes to optimize medication use outcomes in this especially vulnerable population.
Assuntos
Deficiências do Desenvolvimento/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicaid , Adesão à Medicação/etnologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Comparative effectiveness research (CER) is an important branch of pharmacoeconomics that systematically studies and evaluates the cost-effectiveness of medical interventions. CER plays instrumental roles in guiding government public health policy programs and insurance. Countries throughout the world use different methods of CER to help make medical decisions based on providing optimal therapy at a reduced cost. Expenses to the healthcare system continue to rise, and CER is one-way in which expenses could be curbed in the future by applying cost-effectiveness evidence to clinical decisions. China, India, South Korea, and the United Kingdom are of essential focus because these country's economies and health care expenses continue to expand. The structures and use of CER are diverse throughout these countries, and each is of prime importance. By conducting this thorough comparison of CER in different nations, strategies and organizational setups from different countries can be applied to help guide public health and medical decision-making in order to continue to expand the establishment and role of CER programs. The patient-centered medical home has been created to help reduce costs in the primary care sector and to help improve the effectiveness of therapy. Barriers to CER are also important as many stakeholders need to be able to work together to provide the best CER evidence. The advancement of CER in multiple countries throughout the world provides a possible way of reducing costs to the healthcare system in an age of expanding expenses.
Assuntos
Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade/métodos , Tomada de Decisões Assistida por Computador , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Ásia , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade/organização & administração , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade/tendências , Redução de Custos , Custos de Medicamentos/tendências , Indústria Farmacêutica/economia , Indústria Farmacêutica/tendências , Quimioterapia Assistida por Computador , Farmacoeconomia/organização & administração , Farmacoeconomia/tendências , Europa (Continente) , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , América do Norte , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/economia , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/tendênciasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A health care reform has been taking place to provide cost-effective and coordinated care. One method of achieving these goals is a patient-centered medical home (PCMH) model, which is associated with provision of quality care among children belonging to racial/ethnic minorities. Despite the potential of the PCMH for children of minority backgrounds, little is known about the extent to which minorities with mental disorders have the PCMH. OBJECTIVE: The study examined racial/ethnic disparities among children with mental disorders in accessing care from the PCMH. METHODS: The 2009-2010 National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs (CSHCN) was used for this analysis. Multivariate logistic regressions were applied to capture the racial/ethnic disparities and to analyze a composite outcome of the PCMH. RESULTS: An estimated population size of 4 677 904 CSHCN with mental disorders was included. Among them, 59.94% of children reported to have received medical homes. Compared with white children, the odds of receiving any medical home services decreased among Hispanic children (odds ratio [OR] = 0.69; P < .05) and black children (OR = 0.70; P < .05). The likelihood of having a medical home was lower for Hispanic children than white children, when they had attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; OR = 0.57; P < .05) and development delay (OR = 0.73; P < .05). Compared with white children with ADHD or depression having a medical home, the odds of black children with ADHD (OR = 0.63; P < .05) and depression (OR = 0.68; P < .05) having a medical home were lower. CONCLUSIONS: There were significant racial/ethnic disparities among CSHCN with mental disorders, indicating several sizeable effects of each of the 5 components on Hispanic, black, and other children compared with white children. These differences could be a potential to improve racial/ethnic disparities.
Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde da Criança , Serviços Comunitários de Saúde Mental , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/normas , Adolescente , Criança , Serviços de Saúde da Criança/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde da Criança/normas , Serviços Comunitários de Saúde Mental/organização & administração , Serviços Comunitários de Saúde Mental/normas , Etnicidade , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/organização & administração , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Very few studies have captured the differences in the outcomes of pediatric patients based on the patients' type of health insurance plan. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to examine the impact of the type of health insurance plan (public insurance vs. private insurance) on outcomes (health care utilization and medication adherence) in children with asthma. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed Medicaid/commercial data from eight states licensed under Thomson Medstat. Subjects were 11,027 children with asthma (6435 enrolled in Medicaid and 4592 enrolled in a commercial health maintenance organization) who newly started asthma pharmacotherapy and were followed up for 12 months before and after the index anti-asthmatic medication fill. Data on health care utilization and medication adherence were examined to compare health care utilization-based outcomes. Quantile regression analysis was used to study medication adherence, and Poisson regression was used to determine health care utilization. RESULTS: Patients with a private insurance plan had significantly higher medication adherence rates (p < .01) compared with those who had a Medicaid plan. Patients with Medicaid plans also were associated with 20% more inpatient hospitalizations and 48% increased odds of emergency department visits, but they had 42% fewer outpatient visits compared with those who had a private plan (all p < .05). CONCLUSION: Children with asthma who are enrolled in Medicaid receive fairly comprehensive coverage of medical services, and thus further research is needed to determine the reasons for poor health care utilization-related outcomes in this population.
Assuntos
Asma/terapia , Seguro Saúde , Medicaid , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde , Criança , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To perform a systematic review of the current literature to assess the association between integrated healthcare delivery systems and changes in cost and quality. METHODS: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Reviews, Academic Search Premier, and reference lists were used to retrieve peer-reviewed articles reporting outcomes (cost and quality) related to integrated delivery systems. A general Internet search and reference lists were used to retrieve non-peer reviewed publications meeting the same criteria. Included peer and non-peer reviewed publications were based in the United States and were published between the years 2000 and 2011. RESULTS: A total of 21 peer-reviewed articles and 4 non-peer reviewed manuscripts met the inclusion criteria. Twenty studies showed an association between increased integration in healthcare delivery and an increase in the quality of care. One study reported no changes in quality indicators associated with increased integration. None of these studies measured cost reduction directly, but used reduction in utilization of services instead. Four studies associated decreases in the utilization of services with increases in integration. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of studies we reviewed have shown that integrated delivery systems have positive effects on quality of care. Few studies linked use of an integrated delivery system to lower health service utilization. Only 1 study reported some small cost savings.
Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Controle de Custos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The need to focus healthcare expenditures on innovative and sustainable health systems that efficiently use existing effective therapies are the major drivers stimulating Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) across the globe. Lack of adequate access and high cost of essential medicines and technologies in many countries increases morbidity and mortality and cost of care that forces people and families into poverty due to disability and out-of-pocket expenses. This review illustrates the potential of value-added global health care comparative effectiveness research in shaping health systems and health care delivery paradigms in the "global south". Enabling the development of effective CER systems globally paves the way for tangible local and regional definitions of equity in health care because CER fosters the sharing of critical assets, resources, skills, and capabilities and the development of collaborative of multi-sectorial frameworks to improve health outcomes and metrics globally.
Assuntos
Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade/economia , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Humanos , Pobreza/economia , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Acne vulgaris is a common chronic disease that may require long-term treatment. Medication adherence is critical to acne management; non-adherence is a common reason for treatment failure and can lead to poor quality of life. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to examine medication adherence, healthcare costs, and utilization associated with acne drugs among acne patients in the USA. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study from January 2004 to December 2007 using the Marketscan Medicaid Database, a national healthcare claims database. The study followed acne patients aged 0-64 years for 90 days after the first acne drug prescription to measure acne medication adherence, acne-related outpatient visits, and total acne-related healthcare costs. Adherence was measured among different acne drug classes using medication possession ratio (MPR). Multivariate regression analyses were conducted to assess the outcomes. RESULTS: The study included 24,438 eligible patients, of whom 89.39 % were under 18 years old. The average adherence rate to acne drugs (MPR) was 0.34, and only 11.74 % of the patients were adherent (MPR ≥0.80). Patients with drug refills had a higher adherence rate (MPR = 0.74) than who those without refills (MPR = 0.27). Factors significantly associated with adherence were age, comorbidity, gender, number of drug refills and number of drug classes used. Patients were more adherent to oral retinoids than any other acne drug classes (MPR = 0.78, 57 % adherent). Patients were less adherent to oral antibiotics (MPR = 0.21) and topical retinoids (MPR = 0.31). After controlling for medication use behavior, the use of oral antibiotics decreased the number of acne-related outpatient visits by 50.9 % (p < 0.001) and lowered acne-related total costs by 51.7 % (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Medication non-adherence is generally prevalent among young acne patients enrolled in Medicaid. The combination of a topical retinoid and an antibiotic agent may be a good choice given their associated healthcare outcomes and costs. However, adherence to these agents is not satisfactory. Therefore, developing specific strategies to improve adherence to these drugs among teenage acne patients is warranted.
Assuntos
Acne Vulgar/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Retinoides/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicaid/economia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
This study examined how sociological factors including financial incentives influenced whether asthmatic children received a controller medication, a reliever medication or both. The 2007 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey was used for this analysis. A logistic regression was applied to capture the physician's decision-making and to analyze anti-asthmatic medication choice. Children with asthma seeing a pediatrician were approximately 69% more likely than children seeing a family doctor to receive a controller medication than reliever medication (p<0.01). Children with asthma enrolled in a capitated plan were 23% more likely to receive controller medications than reliever medications (p<0.01). Children with asthma of Hispanic ethnicity were 28% less likely to receive controller medication compared to non-Hispanic white (p<0.05) children. Compared with physicians with lower financial incentives, physicians who received medium (39%, p<0.05) or higher (42%, p<0.01) financial incentives from payers were more likely to prescribe controller medication than reliever medication for asthmatic children. An important finding of this study is that physicians who had medium or higher financial incentives from payers were about 40% more likely to prescribe a controller medication in asthmatic children. Findings suggest that physician incentives and capitated plans are associated with an increase in physicians prescribing controller medications or preventive care in children with asthma.
Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Antiasmáticos/administração & dosagem , Planos de Incentivos Médicos , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Phamacoeconomics can aid the policy makers and the healthcare providers in decision making in evaluating the affordability of and access to rational drug use. Efficiency is a key concept of pharmacoeconomics, and various strategies are suggested for buying the greatest amount of benefits for a given resource use. Phamacoeconomic evaluation techniques such as cost minimization analysis, cost effectiveness analysis, cost benefit analysis, and cost utilization analysis, which support identification and quantification of cost of drugs, are conducted in a similar way, but vary in measurement of value of health benefits and outcomes. This article provides a brief overview about pharmacoeconomics, its utility with respect to the Indian pharmaceutical industry, and the expanding insurance system in India. Pharmacoeconomic evidences can be utilized to support decisions on licensing, pricing, reimbursement, and maintenance of formulary procedure of pharmaceuticals. For the insurance companies to give better facility at minimum cost, India must develop the platform for pharmacoeconomics with a validating methodology and appropriate training. The role of clinical pharmacists including PharmD graduates are expected to be more beneficial than the conventional pharmacists, as they will be able to apply the principles of economics in daily basis practice in community and hospital pharmacy.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the impact of state budget cuts on uncompensated care at general acute care hospital organizations. This study capitalized on the variations in the states of Texas and California to form a natural experiment testing the joint impact of budget cut status on uncompensated care costs, as well as specific charity care costs and bad debt expenses from indigent patients. METHODOLOGY: Budget cuts in the state of Texas occurred in the year 2004. Information was obtained from the Texas Department of Health and the California Department of Health Services regarding financial characteristics of hospitals and from the American Hospital Directory annual survey regarding organizational characteristics of hospitals. We created three dependent variables: R(UC) (the ratio of total uncompensated care costs to gross patient revenue), R(CC) (the ratio of charity care to total patient revenue) and R(BD) (the ratio of bad debt expenses to gross patient revenue). Using a two-period panel data set and individual hospital fixed effects, we captured hospital uncompensated care spending that could also have influenced budget cut status. Additionally, the impact of the state budget cut status on hospitals' uncompensated care spending, charity care spending and bad debt expenses was also estimated using the similar methodology. POPULATION STUDIED: In this study, we included 416 (in Texas) and 352 (in California) public, not-for-profit (NFP) and for-profit (FP) hospitals that completed the annual survey during the study period 2002-2005. FINDINGS: For the state of Texas, results from the fixed effect model confirmed that the year 2005 was directly related to increased R(UC) and R(CC) . The coefficients of 2005 were significantly and positively associated with R(UC) (0.43, p < 0.05) and R(CC) (0.29, p < 0.05). These results supported the findings that the R(UC) and the R(CC) would be more positively associated with 2005 than any other year, with other things being equal. However, for the state of California, even though the coefficient of 2005 was significant and positively associated with R(CC) (0.31, p < 0.05), the coefficient of uncompensated care spending was not statistically significant for 2005. CONCLUSION: The healthcare industry is characterized by increased regulation, a growing number of uninsured patients, increasingly stringent reimbursement and competitive practices among hospitals and other providers. Federal and state healthcare agencies are restricting the criteria for eligibility for outlier payments and uncompensated care provisions. Tax exempt status of many NFP hospitals is being examined and tied to specific performances, particularly the provision of uncompensated care. This study provides evidence of the impact of budget cut pressure on uncompensated care provided in Texas general acute care hospitals.
Assuntos
Orçamentos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Governo Estadual , Cuidados de Saúde não Remunerados/tendências , California , Controle de Custos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Humanos , Modelos Estatísticos , Texas , Cuidados de Saúde não Remunerados/economiaRESUMO
This study examined the relationships between SES and diabetes and hypertension for Korean adults using the Korean National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey. To handle the four dummy dependent variables: Diabetes and Hypertension, Diabetes alone, Hypertension alone, and Diabetes or Hypertension, four different logistic models were conducted. The descriptive statistics showed a considerable amount of comorbidity between the combined dependent variable of diabetes and hypertension. To gauge more realistic measures of SES, education and income were combined together as four dummy categories. The SES factor indeed had significant impacts on diabetes and hypertension. Socioeconomically disadvantaged groups demonstrated to have increased likelihood of having these diseases. However, we could not find the strong compensating effect between education and income; the higher level of education but lower income variable was only significant in having both diseases, and the higher income but lower level of education variable was only significant in having hypertension alone and either one of the diseases. Only the highest SES one, the one with a higher level of education and a higher income, was significantly lowering the likelihood of having these diseases in all models. Therefore, public policy and intervention programs should focus on individuals matching these socioeconomic characteristics.