Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
J Intensive Care Soc ; 19(2): 94-100, 2018 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29796064

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated pneumonia is associated with significant morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. Most of the cost data that are available relate to general intensive care patients in privately remunerated institutions. This study assessed the cost of managing ventilator-associated pneumonia in a cardiac intensive care unit in the National Health Service in the United Kingdom. METHODS: Propensity-matched study of prospectively collected data from the cardiac surgical database between April 2011 and December 2014 in all patients undergoing cardiac surgery (n = 3416). Patients who were diagnosed as developing ventilator-associated pneumonia, as per the surveillance definition for ventilator-associated pneumonia (n = 338), were propensity score matched with those who did not (n = 338). Costs of treating post-op cardiac surgery patients in intensive care and cost difference if ventilator-associated pneumonia occurred based on Healthcare Resource Group categories were assessed. Secondary outcomes included differences in morbidity, mortality and cardiac intensive care unit and in-hospital length of stay. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the pre-operative characteristics or procedures between the groups. Ventilator-associated pneumonia developed in 10% of post-cardiac surgery patients. Post-operatively, the ventilator-associated pneumonia group required longer ventilation (p < 0.01), more respiratory support, longer cardiac intensive care unit (8 vs 3, p < 0.001) and in-hospital stay (16 vs 9) days. The overall cost for post-operative recovery after cardiac surgery for ventilator-associated pneumonia patients was £15,124 compared to £6295 for non-ventilator-associated pneumonia (p < 0.01). The additional cost of treating patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia was £8829. CONCLUSION: Ventilator-associated pneumonia was associated with significant morbidity to the patients, generating significant costs. This cost was nearer to the lower end for the cost for general intensive care unit patients in privately reimbursed systems.

2.
Eur Urol ; 73(6): 822-825, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28760646

RESUMO

Many countries have introduced policies that enable patients to select a health care provider of their choice with the aim of improving the quality of care. However, there is little information about the drivers or the impact of patient mobility. Using administrative hospital data (n=19256) we analysed the mobility of prostate cancer patients who had radical surgery in England between 2010 and 2014. Our analysis, using geographic information systems and multivariable choice modelling, found that 33·5% (n=6465) of men bypassed their nearest prostate cancer surgical centre. Travel time had a strong impact on where patients moved to but was less of a factor for men who were younger, fitter, and more affluent (p always < 0.001). Men were more likely to move to hospitals that provided robotic prostate cancer surgery (odds ratio: 1.42, p<0.001) and to hospitals that employed surgeons with a strong media reputation (odds ratio: 2.18, p<0.001). Patient mobility occurred in the absence of validated measures of the quality of care, instead influenced by the adoption of robotic surgery and the reputation of individual clinicians. National policy based on patient choice and provider competition may have had a negative impact on equality of access, service capacity, and health system efficiency. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study, we assessed the reasons why men would choose to have prostate cancer surgery at a centre other than their nearest. We found that in England men were attracted to centres that carried out robotic surgery and employed surgeons with a national reputation.


Assuntos
Comportamento de Escolha , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Preferência do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Competição Econômica , Inglaterra , Sistemas de Informação Geográfica , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Fatores de Tempo , Viagem/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
BJU Int ; 120(2): 219-225, 2017 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28075516

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a surgical performance indicator based on severe urinary complications that require an intervention within 2 years of radical prostatectomy (RP), identified in hospital administrative data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men who underwent RP between 2008 and 2012 in England were identified using hospital administrative data. A transparent coding framework based on procedure codes was developed to identify severe urinary complications which were grouped into 'stricture', 'incontinence' and 'other'. Their validity as a performance indicator was assessed by evaluating the consistency with diagnosis codes and association with patient and surgical characteristics. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to assess time to first occurrence and multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for patient and surgical characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 17 299 men were included, of whom 2695 (15.6%) experienced at least one severe urinary complication within 2 years. High proportions of men with a complication had relevant diagnosis codes: 86% for strictures and 93% for incontinence. Urinary complications were more common in men from poorer socio-economic backgrounds (OR comparing lowest with highest quintile: 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-1.67) and in those with prolonged length of hospital stay (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.40-1.69), and were less common in men who underwent robot-assisted surgery (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.58-0.74). CONCLUSION: These results show that severe urinary complications identified in administrative data provide a medium-term performance indicator after RP. They can be used for research assessing outcomes of treatment methods and for service evaluation comparing performance of prostate cancer surgery providers.


Assuntos
Codificação Clínica , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Transtornos Urinários/diagnóstico , Idoso , Competência Clínica , Constrição Patológica/diagnóstico , Constrição Patológica/etiologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Inglaterra , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Serviço Hospitalar de Registros Médicos/organização & administração , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Incontinência Urinária/diagnóstico , Incontinência Urinária/etiologia , Transtornos Urinários/etiologia
4.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 125(2): 301-5, 2003 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12579098

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Wound infections after cardiac surgery carry high morbidity and mortality. A plethora of management strategies have been used to treat such infections. We assessed the impact of vacuum-assisted closure on the management of sternal wound infections in terms of wound healing, duration of vacuum-assisted closure, and cost of treatment. METHODS: Between November 1998 and June 2001, a total of 27 mediastinal infections were managed with vacuum-assisted closure. Group A (n = 14) had vacuum-assisted closure as the final treatment modality, whereas in group B (n = 13) vacuum-assisted closure was followed by either a myocutaneous flap (n = 8) or primary (n = 5) wound closure. The choice of additional treatment modality was based on wound size. RESULTS: In group A, 4 patients died and a satisfactorily healed scar was achieved in 64% of cases. Median durations of vacuum-assisted closure and hospital stay in group A were 13.5 days (interquartile range 8.8-32.2 days) and 20 days (interquartile range 16.7-25.2 days), respectively. Mortality was 7.7% in group B, with a treatment failure rate of 15%. Median duration of vacuum-assisted closure in group B was 8 days (interquartile range 5.5-18 days), and median hospital stay was 29 days (interquartile range 25.8-38.2 days). During the year before institution of vacuum-assisted closure, poststernotomy infection (n = 13) was managed with rewiring and closed irrigation system. Treatment during this year failed in 30.7% of cases (n = 4/13), and mortality was also 30.7%. The total cost (hospitalization and treatment) per patient for vacuum-assisted closure was 16,400 dollars, compared with 20,000 dollars for the closed irrigation system treatment. CONCLUSION: Vacuum-assisted closure, used alone or before other surgical treatment strategies, is an acceptable treatment modality for infections in cardiac surgery with reasonable morbidity, mortality, and cost.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Mediastinite/etiologia , Mediastinite/terapia , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Sucção/métodos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/terapia , Cicatrização , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Terapia Combinada , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Seguimentos , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Mediastinite/mortalidade , Resistência a Meticilina , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morbidade , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/economia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/etiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/mortalidade , Infecções Estafilocócicas/terapia , Staphylococcus aureus , Sucção/economia , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/mortalidade , Irrigação Terapêutica/economia , Irrigação Terapêutica/métodos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 124(5): 911-7, 2002 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12407373

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The ability to detect residual regurgitation is important in the management of patients after mitral valve repair. We performed a study of 264 patients to determine the risk factors and to compare the accuracy of clinical assessment with that of echocardiography. METHODS: Operative details and valve pathologic data were obtained from individual patient case notes. Clinical assessment consisted of history, examination, and electrocardiography. The presence of regurgitation was ranked in 7 grades, from none to severe. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed blinded to and independently of clinical assessment on the same visit and was graded similarly. Univariate analyses of demographic, etiologic, and operative variables were performed. Significant factors were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model. Sensitivities and specificities were calculated for each diagnostic modality, and the kappa statistic was used to express agreement. RESULTS: Mean (+/- SE) freedoms from regurgitation at 1 and 5 years were 91.5% +/- 1.7% and 47.5% +/- 3.2%. Factors independently associated with postoperative regurgitation were poor ventricular function (P =.04), increased age (P =.01), and chordal procedures (P =.006). When assessing the presence of regurgitation, auscultation conferred a specificity of 78%, a sensitivity of 77%, and a kappa of 0.43 relative to echocardiography. Electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy were superior, with a complete specificity of 100% but a low sensitivity of 15%. Agreement within 7 grades of severity was moderate, with a weighted kappa value of 0.42. CONCLUSIONS: The hazard function for regurgitation after mitral repair increases steadily after the third year, with ventricular function, age and chordal procedures as independent risks. Clinical assessment and electrocardiography are excellent in identifying regurgitation, but their agreement is less when grading severity.


Assuntos
Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/diagnóstico , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Idoso , Ecocardiografia , Eletrocardiografia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/epidemiologia , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/fisiopatologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/fisiopatologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Recidiva , Fatores de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Reino Unido , Função Ventricular Esquerda/fisiologia
6.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 21(2): 226-32, 2002 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11834351

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation has become an established procedure for treating patients with endstage lung disease, resulting in broadening criteria for recipient selection. The survival benefit for some patient groups has yet to be established. METHODS: We reviewed 653 patients accepted for lung transplantation at our center. Patients were categorized into 6 diagnosis groups: cystic fibrosis (174), obstructive lung disease (163), pulmonary fibrosis (100), Eisenmenger's syndrome (76), pulmonary hypertension (68), bronchiectasis (51), and other (21). Using Cox regression, we estimated the time at which early operative risk of death fell below pre-operative risk levels (crossover point) and the point at which early high post-operative risk was offset by later low risk (equity point). The relative benefits of single lung vs double lung/heart-lung transplantation were assessed for patients with obstructive lung disease and pulmonary fibrosis. RESULTS: Post-operative risk of death fell below pre-operative risk levels for all diagnosis groups, indicating a survival advantage. The equity point was achieved for all distinct diagnosis groups (except Eisenmenger's); this survival benefit was significant for patients with obstructive lung disease, cystic fibrosis, and pulmonary hypertension. Single lung vs double lung/ heart-lung comparisons showed no significant difference in survival benefit. CONCLUSION: All survival benefit patient groups achieve after lung transplantation, with the exception of patients with Eisenmenger's syndrome, who may have prolonged survival while listed. Differences in survival benefit between single lung and double or heart-lung transplantation are not significant for patients with obstructive lung disease or pulmonary fibrosis.


Assuntos
Transplante de Pulmão/mortalidade , Adulto , Estudos Cross-Over , Complexo de Eisenmenger/diagnóstico , Complexo de Eisenmenger/mortalidade , Complexo de Eisenmenger/cirurgia , Seguimentos , Volume Expiratório Forçado/fisiologia , Transplante de Coração/mortalidade , Humanos , Hipertensão Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Hipertensão Pulmonar/mortalidade , Hipertensão Pulmonar/cirurgia , Expectativa de Vida , Pneumopatias/diagnóstico , Pneumopatias/mortalidade , Pneumopatias/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Listas de Espera
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA