Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Head Trauma Rehabil ; 32(3): 185-196, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27831962

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic utility of electrophysiological recordings during active cognitive tasks in detecting residual cognitive capacities in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) after severe acquired brain injury. DESIGN: Systematic review of empirical research in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cochrane from January 2002 to March 2016. MAIN MEASURES: Data extracted included sample size, type of electrophysiological technique and task design, rate of cognitive responders, false negatives and positives, and excluded subjects from the study analysis. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) was used for quality appraisal of the retrieved literature. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies examining electrophysiological signs of command-following in patients with DoC were identified. Sensitivity rates in healthy controls demonstrated variable accuracy across the studies, ranging from 71% to 100%. In patients with DoC, specificity and sensitivity rates varied in the included studies, ranging from 0% to 100%. Pronounced heterogeneity was found between studies regarding methodological approaches, task design, and procedures of analysis, rendering comparison between studies challenging. CONCLUSION: We are still far from establishing precise recommendations for standardized electrophysiological diagnostic procedures in DoC, but electrophysiological methods may add supplemental diagnostic information of covert cognition in some patients with DoC.


Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/complicações , Transtornos da Consciência/diagnóstico , Eletrodiagnóstico/métodos , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/diagnóstico , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/terapia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica/métodos , Transtornos da Consciência/etiologia , Eletrofisiologia/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prognóstico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
2.
Rev Neurol (Paris) ; 166(8-9): 675-82, 2010.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20223495

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Difficulties in detecting bedside signs of consciousness in non-communicative patients still lead to a high rate of misdiagnosis illustrating the need to employ standardized behavioral assessment scales. STATE OF ART: The Sensory Modality Assessment and Rehabilitation Technique (SMART) is a behavioral assessment scale of consciousness that assesses responses to multimodal sensory stimulation in disorders of consciousness. These stimulations can also be considered to have therapeutic value. PERSPECTIVES: We here review the different components and use of the SMART assessment and discuss its validity, reliability, and robustness in clinical practice. The scale has a high intra- and inter-observer reliability thanks to a detailed procedure description. However, in the absence of objective gold standards in the assessment of consciousness, it is currently difficult to make strong claims about its validity. A comparison between SMART and other standardized and validated coma-scales is proposed. CONCLUSION: In our view, SMART is an interesting tool for monitoring patients with altered states of consciousness subsequent to coma. Currently, we await studies on its concurrent validity as compared to other validated behavioral assessment scales and on the effect of SMART stimulations on patient outcome.


Assuntos
Sintomas Comportamentais/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Consciência/diagnóstico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Sintomas Comportamentais/etiologia , Sintomas Comportamentais/psicologia , Coma/diagnóstico , Coma/psicologia , Comunicação , Transtornos da Consciência/complicações , Transtornos da Consciência/psicologia , Humanos , Orientação , Percepção , Reflexo Anormal , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Índices de Gravidade do Trauma
3.
Rev Med Liege ; 63(5-6): 429-37, 2008.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18669216

RESUMO

Pain is a subjective experience. Its assessment is based on the subject's direct verbal report. This method of assessment is, however, impossible in patients who cannot communicate their feelings. In this context, indirect measurements such as behavioral observations or physiological measurements are needed. To facilitate the assessment of pain in non-communicative patients, numerous standardized behavioral scales have been developed. The aim of this review is to discuss the main validated pain scales employed in end-stage dementia, newborn and preverbal children, and severely brain damaged patients with a disorder of consciousness such as coma, the vegetative state or the minimally conscious state.


Assuntos
Demência , Medição da Dor/métodos , Idoso , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA