RESUMO
This article summarizes the clinical practice guideline (CPG) for the management of acute pancreatitis in the Social Security of Peru (EsSalud), to provide evidence-based clinical recommendations for the management of acute pancreatitis in EsSalud. A guideline development group (GEG) was formed that included medical specialists and methodologists. The GEG formulated 7 clinical questions to be answered by this CPG. Systematic searches of systematic reviews and -when considered relevant- primary studies were carried out in PubMed during 2022. The evidence was selected to answer each of the clinical questions posed. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. In periodic work meetings, the GEG used the GRADE methodology to review the evidence and formulate the recommendations, the points of good clinical practice, and the corresponding flow charts. Finally, the CPG was approved with Resolution No. 105-IETSI-ESSALUD-2022. This CPG addressed 7 clinical questions on fluid therapy, start of enteral nutrition, analgesia, type of nutrition, antibiotic, and surgical treatment. Based on these questions, 8 recommendations (1 strong and 7 conditional), 13 BPCs, and 1 flowchart were formulated. This article summarizes the methodology and evidence-based conclusions of the CPG for the management of acute pancreatitis in EsSalud.
Assuntos
Pancreatite , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Humanos , Doença Aguda , Pancreatite/diagnóstico , Pancreatite/terapia , PeruRESUMO
El presente artículo resume la guía de práctica clínica (GPC) para el manejo de la pancreatitis aguda en el Seguro Social del Perú (EsSalud). Su objetivo es proveer recomendaciones clínicas basadas en evidencia para el manejo de la pancreatitis aguda en EsSalud. Se conformó un grupo elaborador de la guía (GEG) que incluyó médicos especialistas y metodólogos. El GEG formuló 7 preguntas clínicas a ser respondidas por la presente GPC. Se realizó búsquedas sistemáticas de revisiones sistemáticas y -cuando fue considerado pertinente- estudios primarios en PubMed durante el 2022. Se seleccionó la evidencia para responder cada una de las preguntas clínicas planteadas. La certeza de la evidencia fue evaluada usando la metodología Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). En reuniones de trabajo periódicas, el GEG usó la metodología GRADE para revisar la evidencia y formular las recomendaciones, los puntos de buenas prácticas clínicas y flujogramas correspondientes. Finalmente, la GPC fue aprobada con Resolución N° 105-IETSI-ESSALUD-2022. La presente GPC abordó 7 preguntas clínicas sobre fluidoterapia, momento de inicio de nutrición enteral, analgesia, tipo de nutrición, tratamiento antibiótico y quirúrgico. En base a dichas preguntas se formularon 8 recomendaciones (1 fuerte y 7 condicionales), 13 BPC, y 1 flujograma. El presente artículo resume la metodología y las conclusiones basadas en evidencia de la GPC para el manejo de la pancreatitis aguda en EsSalud.
This article summarizes the clinical practice guideline (CPG) for the management of acute pancreatitis in the Social Security of Peru (EsSalud), to provide evidence-based clinical recommendations for the management of acute pancreatitis in EsSalud. A guideline development group (GEG) was formed that included medical specialists and methodologists. The GEG formulated 7 clinical questions to be answered by this CPG. Systematic searches of systematic reviews and -when considered relevant-primary studies were carried out in PubMed during 2022. The evidence was selected to answer each of the clinical questions posed. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. In periodic work meetings, the GEG used the GRADE methodology to review the evidence and formulate the recommendations, the points of good clinical practice, and the corresponding ow charts. Finally, the CPG was approved with Resolution No. 105-IETSI-ESSALUD-2022. This CPG addressed 7 clinical questions on buid therapy, start of enteral nutrition, analgesia, type of nutrition, antibiotic, and surgical treatment. Based on these questions, 8 recommendations (1 strong and 7 conditional), 13 BPCs, and 1 flowchart were formulated. This article summarizes the methodology and evidence-based conclusions of the CPG for the management of acute pancreatitis in EsSalud.
RESUMO
In this paper, the 4E assessment (Energetic, Exergetic, Exergoeconomic and Exergoenvironmental) of a low-temperature ORC activated by two different alternatives is presented. The first alternative (S1) contemplates the activation of the ORC through the recovery of waste heat from a flash-binary geothermal power plant. The second alternative (S2) contemplates the activation of the ORC using direct heat from a geothermal well. For both alternatives, the energetic and exergetic models were established. At the same time, the economic and environmental impact models were developed. Finally, based on the combination of the exergy concepts and the economic and ecological indicators, the exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental performances of the ORC were obtained. The results show higher economic, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental profitability for S1. Besides, for the alternative S1, the ORC cycle has an acceptable economic profitability for a net power of 358.4 kW at a temperature of 110 °C, while for S2, this profitability starts being attractive for a power 2.65 times greater than S1 and with a temperature higher than 135 °C. In conclusion, the above represents an area of opportunity and a considerable advantage for the implementation of the ORC in the recovery of waste heat from flash-binary geothermal power plants.
RESUMO
La resolución quirúrgica de la hiperplasia prostática benigna se modifca conforme el acceso a las diferentes tecnologías en salud. Las complicaciones del abordaje endoscópico versus el convencional son similares. El Objetivo de este estudio fue analizar retrospectivamente los resultados de la cirugía convencional y la resección endoscópica monopolar de la hiperplasia de próstata en un hospital terciario del Ecuador. Pacientes y Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo, analítico. Fueron incluidos en el estudio 232 pacientes con diagnóstico histopatológico de hiperplasia prostática benigna atendidos en el servicio de urología del hospital Luis Vernaza en el período enero 2015 diciembre 2016. Los pacientes fueron divididos en 2 subgrupos de acuerdo con el abordaje terapéutico quirúrgico: prostatectomía convencional (n = 120) y resección endoscópica (n = 112). Resultados: Mediante estadística inferencial se comprobó una relación estadísticamente signifcativa entre el tipo de abordaje terapéutico con el tiempo quirúrgico (p= <0.001) y con el índice de sangrado (p= <0.001) y entre la edad y el tiempo quirúrgico (p= <0.001). Las complicaciones más importantes fueron: hemorragia inmediata (n=9) e infecciones de la herida (n=10) para la cirugía convencional y hemorragia inmediata (n=2) y sepsis (n=3) para la cirugía endoscópica. La media de tiempo quirúrgico fue 103.03 min y 75.14 min respectivamente. Conclusión: El desarrollo tecnológico ha traído la certeza de que la cirugía endoscópica tiene menores complicaciones, disminuye los tiempos quirúrgicos. Siendo una opción por considerar frente a la cirugía tradicional para la hiperplasia de próstata
Surgical resolution of benign prostatic hyperplasia is modifed as access to different health technologies. Complications of endoscopic versus conventional approach are similar. The objective of this study was to retrospectively analyze the results of conventional surgery and monopolistic endoscopic resection of prostate hyperplasia in a tertiary hospital in Ecuador. Patients and Methods: Retrospective, analytical study. 232 patients diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia were included in the study in the urology service of the Luis Vernaza hospital in the period January 2015 December 2016. Patients were divided into 2 subgroups according to the therapeuticsurgical approach: conventional prostatectomy (n.120) and endoscopic resection (n. 112). Results: By inferential statistics, a statistically signifcant relationship was found between the type of therapeutic approach with the surgical time (p. 0.001) and with the bleeding index (p. 0.001) and between age and surgical time (p. 0.001). The most important complications were: immediate bleeding (n-9) and wound infections (no. 10) for conventional surgery and immediate bleeding (n-2) and sepsis (no. 3) for endoscopic surgery. The surgical mean time was 103.03 min and 75.14 min respectively. Conclusions: Technological development has brought the certainty that endoscopic surgery has fewer complications, decreases surgical times. Being an option to consider against traditional prostate hyperplasia surgery
