Assessment of inhalation exposure to microplastic particles when disposable masks are repeatedly used.

Wearing masks to prevent infectious diseases, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, is common. However, concerns arise about inhalation exposure to microplastics (MPs) when disposable masks are improperly reused. In this study, we assessed whether disposable masks release inhalable MPs when reused in simulated wearing conditions. All experiments were conducted using a controlled test chamber setup with a constant inspiratory flow. Commercially available medical masks with a three-layer material, composition comprising polypropylene (PP in the outer and middle layers) and polyethylene (PE in the inner layer), were used as the test material. Brand-new masks with and without hand rubbing, as well as reused medical masks, were tested. Physical properties (number, size, and shape) and chemical composition (polymers) were identified using various analytical techniques such as fluorescence staining, fluorescence microscopy, and micro-Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (µFTIR). Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) was used to scrutinize the surface structure of reused masks across different layers, elucidating the mechanism behind the MP generation. The findings revealed that brand-new masks subjected to hand rubbing exhibited a higher cumulative count of MPs, averaging approximately 1.5 times more than those without hand rubbing. Fragments remained the predominant shape across all selected size classes among the released MPs from reused masks, primarily through a physical abrasion mechanism, accounting for >90 % of the total MPs. The numbers of PE particles were higher than PP particles, indicating that the inner layer of the mask contributed more inhalable MPs than the middle and outer layers combined. The released MPs from reused masks reached their peak after 8 h of wearing. This implies that regularly replacing masks serves as a preventive measure and mitigates associated health risks of inhalation exposure to MPs.

Assessment of Polyethylene Glycol-Coated Gold Nanoparticle Toxicity and Inflammation In Vivo Using NF-κB Reporter Mice.

Polyethylene glycol (PEG) coating of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) improves AuNP distribution via blood circulation. The use of PEG-coated AuNPs was shown to result in acute injuries to the liver, kidney, and spleen, but long-term toxicity has not been well studied. In this study, we investigated reporter induction for up to 90 days in NF-κB transgenic reporter mice following intravenous injection of PEG-coated AuNPs. The results of different doses (1 and 4 µg AuNPs per gram of body weight), particle sizes (13 nm and 30 nm), and PEG surfaces (methoxyl- or carboxymethyl-PEG 5 kDa) were compared. The data showed up to 7-fold NF-κB reporter induction in mouse liver from 3 h to 7 d post PEG-AuNP injection compared to saline-injected control mice, and gradual reduction to a level similar to control by 90 days. Agglomerates of PEG-AuNPs were detected in liver Kupffer cells, but neither gross pathological abnormality in liver sections nor increased activity of liver enzymes were found at 90 days. Injection of PEG-AuNPs led to an increase in collagen in liver sections and elevated total serum cholesterol, although still within the normal range, suggesting that inflammation resulted in mild fibrosis and affected hepatic function. Administrating PEG-AuNPs inevitably results in nanoparticles entrapped in the liver; thus, further investigation is required to fully assess the long-term impacts by PEG-AuNPs on liver health.

Development of a Novel Shallow Liquid Interface Exposure System for MWCNT Toxicity Assessment.

Increasing applications of multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) lead to significant occupational exposure and potential health concerns. Toxicity of MWCNT should be carefully elucidated since the conventional (CON) method with fully immersed condition fails to mimic the air-liquid interface (ALI) in airways. Additionally, quantification of MWCNT in cells was a real challenge. Currently available ALI exposure devices are costly, posing problems to conducting in vitro evaluations for emerging nanomaterials. A novel system, consisting of a shaker fluidized-bed atomizer (SFA) and electrostatic shallow liquid interface (ESLI) exposure chamber, has been developed for investigating nanotoxicity of well-dispersed pristine-MWCNT (pMWCNT) and carboxylized-MWCNT (cMWCNT). After 24-h exposure, LDH, MCP-1, IL-1ß, IL-6, and TNF-α releases were determined, and cell uptakes were quantified according to the molybdenum content in cells. Biological responses triggered by SLI exposure are obviously more sensitive compared with those caused by CON exposure at equivalent doses. Exposure dose-dependent release of LDH and IL-6 was highlighted in A549 cells, indicating higher cytotoxicity and inflammatory responses of cMWCNT attributed to its shorter length, smaller size, and higher cell uptake. Cell-associated dose-dependent release of LDH and IL-6 was highlighted in RAW264.7 cells, revealing the higher adverse health risk of pMWCNT due to frustrated phagocytosis and its much higher molybdenum content. These results suggest that inherent characteristics of cells and distinct physicochemical properties of pMWCNT and cMWCNT lead to either exposure dose-dependent or cell-associated dose-dependent responses. Notably, the SLI is superior to the CON exposure method and well suited for nanotoxicity assessment of different MWCNTs.

Particle Size-Selective Assessment of Protection of European Standard FFP Respirators and Surgical Masks against Particles-Tested with Human Subjects.

This study was conducted to investigate the protection of disposable filtering half-facepiece respirators of different grades against particles between 0.093 and 1.61 µm. A personal sampling system was used to particle size-selectively assess the protection of respirators. The results show that about 10.9% of FFP2 respirators and 28.2% of FFP3 respirators demonstrate assigned protection factors (APFs) below 10 and 20, which are the levels assigned for these respirators by the British Standard. On average, the protection factors of FFP respirators were 11.5 to 15.9 times greater than those of surgical masks. The minimum protection factors (PFs) were observed for particles between 0.263 and 0.384 µm. No significant difference in PF results was found among FFP respirator categories and particle size. A strong association between fit factors and protection factors was found. The study indicates that FFP respirators may not achieve the expected protection level and the APFs may need to be revised for these classes of respirators.