Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 24
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
MedEdPORTAL ; 20: 11416, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38957531

RESUMO

Introduction: The influence of implicit biases in virtual interviews must be addressed to ensure equity within the admissions process. ABATE is a mnemonic framework of five specific categories of implicit bias (affinity-based, backdrop-based, appearance-based, technology and media-based, and enunciation-based biases) that should be anticipated and mitigated for faculty, staff, health professionals, and medical students who conduct virtual interviews at medical schools. Methods: A 60-minute workshop was developed to educate medical school admissions interviewers about the ABATE model and strategies to mitigate implicit bias during virtual interviews. Four workshops were held over 1 year totaling 217 individual attendees. The workshops were evaluated using a single-group, pre-post questionnaire designed with the Kirkpatrick evaluation model. Results: Attendees reported that they found the ABATE workshop useful and relevant to improving their ability to minimize implicit bias during virtual interviews. Significant improvements were found in attendee reactions to the utility of implicit bias training (M pre = 2.6, M post = 3.1, p = .002). Significant changes were also reported in attendees' attitudes about interviewing confidence (M pre = 3.0, M post = 3.2, p = .04), bias awareness (M pre = 3.0, M post = 3.4, p = .002), and identifying and applying bias mitigation solutions (M pre = 2.5, M post = 3.0, p = .003). Knowledge specific to backdrop-based biases also significantly increased (M pre = 3.2, M post = 3.4, p = .04). Discussion: The ABATE workshop demonstrates promise in mitigating implicit bias in virtual medical school interviews.


Assuntos
Entrevistas como Assunto , Faculdades de Medicina , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto/métodos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Critérios de Admissão Escolar , Estudantes de Medicina/psicologia , Estudantes de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Viés , Educação/métodos , Masculino , Feminino
3.
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging ; 17(2): e015495, 2024 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38377237

RESUMO

Bias in health care has been well documented and results in disparate and worsened outcomes for at-risk groups. Medical imaging plays a critical role in facilitating patient diagnoses but involves multiple sources of bias including factors related to access to imaging modalities, acquisition of images, and assessment (ie, interpretation) of imaging data. Machine learning (ML) applied to diagnostic imaging has demonstrated the potential to improve the quality of imaging-based diagnosis and the precision of measuring imaging-based traits. Algorithms can leverage subtle information not visible to the human eye to detect underdiagnosed conditions or derive new disease phenotypes by linking imaging features with clinical outcomes, all while mitigating cognitive bias in interpretation. Importantly, however, the application of ML to diagnostic imaging has the potential to either reduce or propagate bias. Understanding the potential gain as well as the potential risks requires an understanding of how and what ML models learn. Common risks of propagating bias can arise from unbalanced training, suboptimal architecture design or selection, and uneven application of models. Notwithstanding these risks, ML may yet be applied to improve gain from imaging across all 3A's (access, acquisition, and assessment) for all patients. In this review, we present a framework for understanding the balance of opportunities and challenges for minimizing bias in medical imaging, how ML may improve current approaches to imaging, and what specific design considerations should be made as part of efforts to maximize the quality of health care for all.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Aprendizado de Máquina , Humanos
5.
Am J Cardiol ; 207: 245-252, 2023 11 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37757521

RESUMO

Choosing optimal P2Y12 inhibitor in frail older adults is challenging because they are at increased risk of both ischemic and bleeding events. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of Medicare Advantage Plan beneficiaries who were prescribed clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor after percutaneous coronary intervention-treated ST-elevation myocardial infarction from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2020. Frailty was defined using claims-based frailty index ≥0.25. We conducted multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with using potent P2Y12 inhibitors and multivariable-adjusted competing risk analyses to compare the rate of discontinuation of potent P2Y12 inhibitors in frail versus non-frail patients. There were 11,239 patients (mean age 74 years, 39% women). The prevalence of cardiovascular and geriatric co-morbidities was as follows: 32% chronic kidney disease, 28% heart failure, 10% previous myocardial infarction, 6% dementia, 20% anemia, and 12% frailty. The proportion of patients receiving clopidogrel decreased from 78.3% in 2010 to 2013 to 42.1% in 2018 to 2020, with a concurrent increase in those receiving potent P2Y12 inhibitors (mostly ticagrelor) from 21.7% to 57.9%. Frailty was independently associated with reduced odds of initiation (odds ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 0.90) but not with discontinuation of potent P2Y12 inhibitors (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 0.98 to 1.22). In conclusion, frail older adults are less likely to receive potent P2Y12 inhibitors after percutaneous coronary intervention-treated ST-elevation myocardial infarction, but they are as likely as non-frail patients to continue with the prescribed P2Y12 inhibitor.


Assuntos
Fragilidade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Masculino , Clopidogrel/uso terapêutico , Ticagrelor/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas do Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/uso terapêutico , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/tratamento farmacológico , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/etiologia , Fragilidade/epidemiologia , Fragilidade/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medicare , Cloridrato de Prasugrel , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 71(10): 3110-3121, 2023 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37345734

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Frail older adults may be less likely to receive guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT)-renin-angiotensin blockers, beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists-for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We aimed to examine the uptake of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) and GDMT in frail older adults with HFrEF. METHODS: Using 2015-2019 Medicare data, we estimated the proportion of beneficiaries with HFrEF receiving ARNI and GDMT each year by frailty status, defined by a claims-based frailty index. Logistic regression was used to identify clinical characteristics associated with ARNI initiation. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine the association of GDMT use in 2015 and death or heart failure hospitalization in 2016-2019. RESULTS: Among 147,506-180,386 beneficiaries with HFrEF (mean age: 77 years; 27% women; 42.6-49.1% frail) in 2015-2019, the proportion of patients receiving ARNI increased in both non-frail (0.4%-16.4%) and frail (0.3%-13.7%) patients (p for yearly-trend-by-frailty = 0.970). Among those not receiving a renin-angiotensin system blocker, patients with age ≥ 85 years (odds ratio [95% CI], 0.89 [0.80-0.99]), dementia (0.88 [0.81-0.96]), and frailty (0.87 [0.81-0.94]) were less likely to initiate ARNI. The proportion of patients receiving all 3 GDMT classes increased in non-frail patients (22.0%-27.0%) but changed minimally in frail patients (19.6%-21.8%). Regardless of frailty status, treatment with at least 1 class of GDMT was associated with lower death or heart failure hospitalization than no GDMT medications (hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.94 [0.91-0.97], 0.92 [0.89-0.94], 0.94 [0.91-0.97] for 1, 2, and 3 classes, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest an evidence-practice gap in the use of ARNI and GDMT in Medicare beneficiaries with HFrEF, particularly those with frailty. Efforts to narrow this gap are needed to reduce the burden of HFrEF in older adults.


Assuntos
Fragilidade , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Estados Unidos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Masculino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Neprilisina/farmacologia , Neprilisina/uso terapêutico , Volume Sistólico , Fragilidade/tratamento farmacológico , Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Medicare , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico
7.
Nature ; 616(7957): 520-524, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37020027

RESUMO

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been developed for echocardiography1-3, although it has not yet been tested with blinding and randomization. Here we designed a blinded, randomized non-inferiority clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05140642; no outside funding) of AI versus sonographer initial assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to evaluate the impact of AI in the interpretation workflow. The primary end point was the change in the LVEF between initial AI or sonographer assessment and final cardiologist assessment, evaluated by the proportion of studies with substantial change (more than 5% change). From 3,769 echocardiographic studies screened, 274 studies were excluded owing to poor image quality. The proportion of studies substantially changed was 16.8% in the AI group and 27.2% in the sonographer group (difference of -10.4%, 95% confidence interval: -13.2% to -7.7%, P < 0.001 for non-inferiority, P < 0.001 for superiority). The mean absolute difference between final cardiologist assessment and independent previous cardiologist assessment was 6.29% in the AI group and 7.23% in the sonographer group (difference of -0.96%, 95% confidence interval: -1.34% to -0.54%, P < 0.001 for superiority). The AI-guided workflow saved time for both sonographers and cardiologists, and cardiologists were not able to distinguish between the initial assessments by AI versus the sonographer (blinding index of 0.088). For patients undergoing echocardiographic quantification of cardiac function, initial assessment of LVEF by AI was non-inferior to assessment by sonographers.


Assuntos
Inteligência Artificial , Cardiologistas , Ecocardiografia , Testes de Função Cardíaca , Humanos , Inteligência Artificial/normas , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Ecocardiografia/normas , Volume Sistólico , Função Ventricular Esquerda , Método Simples-Cego , Fluxo de Trabalho , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Testes de Função Cardíaca/métodos , Testes de Função Cardíaca/normas
8.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(11): e2242964, 2022 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36399339

RESUMO

Importance: Undertreatment of older adults with atrial fibrillation with anticoagulation therapy is an important practice gap. It has been posited that the availability of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) would improve oral anticoagulant (OAC) initiation in older adults with atrial fibrillation given their superior safety profile compared with warfarin. Objectives: To systematically examine trends in OAC initiation and nonadherence in older adults with atrial fibrillation and coexisting geriatric conditions. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study uses administrative claims data from Optum's Clinformatics Data Mart from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2020. Participants included beneficiaries of Medicare Advantage plans aged 65 years and older with atrial fibrillation and elevated risk of ischemic stroke. Data analysis was performed from October 2021 to October 2022. Exposures: Coexisting dementia, frailty, and anemia. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were OAC initiation within 12 months after the first diagnosis of atrial fibrillation per year and nonadherence with OAC per year (defined as <80% of proportion of days covered among patients newly started on OAC in each year). Results: There were 21 603 to 51 236 patients per year (total for 2010-2020, 381 488 patients) in the OAC-eligible incident AF cohort (mean [SD] age, 77.2 [6.1] to 77.4 [6.8] years; 13 871 [51.8%] to 22 901 [49.8%] women). OAC initiation within 12 months after incident AF increased from 20.2% (5405 of 26 782 patients) in 2010 to 32.9% (7111 of 21 603 patients) in 2020. DOAC uptake increased from 1.1% (291 of 26 782 patients) to 30.9% (6678 of 21 603 patients), and warfarin initiation decreased from 19.1% (5114 of 26 782 patients) to 2.0% (436 of 21 603 patients). Older age (odds ratio [OR], 0.98; 95% CI, 0.98-0.98), dementia (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.55-0.58), frailty (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.72-0.76), and anemia (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.74-0.77) were associated with lower odds of OAC initiation. During the study period, the median (IQR) proportion of days covered increased from 77.6% (41.0%-96.4%) to 90.2% (57.4%-98.6%), and OAC nonadherence decreased from 52.2% (2290 of 4389 patients) to 39.0% (3434 of 8798 patients). Conclusions and Relevance: Since the introduction of DOACs, OAC initiation in older adults with has improved but remained suboptimal in 2020. Additional strategies are needed to improve stroke prophylaxis in all older adults with atrial fibrillation including those with coexisting dementia, frailty, and anemia.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Demência , Fragilidade , Humanos , Feminino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Idoso , Masculino , Fibrilação Atrial/complicações , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Varfarina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fragilidade/complicações , Administração Oral , Medicare , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Demência/tratamento farmacológico
9.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 11(18): e026472, 2022 09 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36073630

RESUMO

Background Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is known to reduce morbidity and mortality for patients with cardiac conditions. Sociodemographic disparities in accessing CR persist and could be related to the distance between where patients live and where CR facilities are located. Our objective is to determine the association between sociodemographic characteristics and geographic proximity to CR facilities. Methods and Results We identified actively operating CR facilities across Los Angeles County and used multivariable Poisson regression to examine the association between sociodemographic characteristics of residential proximity to the nearest CR facility. We also calculated the proportion of residents per area lacking geographic proximity to CR facilities across sociodemographic characteristics, from which we calculated prevalence ratios. We found that racial and ethnic minorities, compared with non-Hispanic White individuals, more frequently live ≥5 miles from a CR facility. The greatest geographic disparity was seen for non-Hispanic Black individuals, with a 2.73 (95% CI, 2.66-2.79) prevalence ratio of living at least 5 miles from a CR facility. Notably, the municipal region with the largest proportion of census tracts comprising mostly non-White residents (those identifying as Hispanic or a race other than White), with median annual household income <$60 000, contained no CR facilities despite ranking among the county's highest in population density. Conclusions Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic characteristics are significantly associated with lack of geographic proximity to a CR facility. Interventions targeting geographic as well as nongeographic factors may be needed to reduce disparities in access to exercise-based CR programs. Such interventions could increase the potential of CR to benefit patients at high risk for developing adverse cardiovascular outcomes.


Assuntos
Reabilitação Cardíaca , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Etnicidade , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Los Angeles/epidemiologia
11.
BMJ Nutr Prev Health ; 4(1): 166-173, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34308124

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Early reports highlighted racial/ethnic disparities in the severity of COVID-19 seen across the USA; the extent to which these disparities have persisted over time remains unclear. Our research objective was to understand temporal trends in racial/ethnic variation in severity of COVID-19 illness presenting over time. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using longitudinal data from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, a high-volume health system in Southern California. We studied patients admitted to the hospital with COVID-19 illness from 4 March 2020 through 5 December 2020. Our primary outcome was COVID-19 severity of illness among hospitalised patients, assessed by racial/ethnic group status. We defined overall illness severity as an ordinal outcome: hospitalisation but no intensive care unit (ICU) admission; admission to the ICU but no intubation; and intubation or death. RESULTS: A total of 1584 patients with COVID-19 with available demographic and clinical data were included. Hispanic/Latinx compared with non-Hispanic white patients had higher odds of experiencing more severe illness among hospitalised patients (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.62 to 3.22) and this disparity persisted over time. During the initial 2 months of the pandemic, non-Hispanic blacks were more likely to suffer severe illness than non-Hispanic whites (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.07 to 3.78); this disparity improved by May, only to return later in the pandemic. CONCLUSION: In our patient sample, the severity of observed COVID-19 illness declined steadily over time, but these clinical improvements were not seen evenly across racial/ethnic groups; greater illness severity continues to be experienced among Hispanic/Latinx patients.

12.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(4): e214157, 2021 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33818619

RESUMO

Importance: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an unprecedented shift in ambulatory cardiovascular care from in-person to remote visits. Objective: To understand whether the transition to remote visits is associated with disparities in patient use of care, diagnostic test ordering, and medication prescribing. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used electronic health records data for all ambulatory cardiology visits at an urban, multisite health system in Los Angeles County, California, during 2 periods: April 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019 (pre-COVID) and April 1 to December 31, 2020 (COVID-era). Statistical analysis was performed from January to February 2021. Exposure: In-person or remote ambulatory cardiology clinic visit at one of 31 during the pre-COVID period or COVID-era period. Main Outcomes and Measures: Comparison of patient characteristics and frequencies of medication ordering and cardiology-specific testing across 4 visit types (pre-COVID in-person (reference), COVID-era in-person, COVID-era video, COVID-era telephone). Results: This study analyzed data from 87 182 pre-COVID in-person, 74 498 COVID-era in-person, 4720 COVID-era video, and 10 381 COVID-era telephone visits. Across visits, 79 572 patients were female (45.0%), 127 080 patients were non-Hispanic White (71.9%), and the mean (SD) age was 68.1 (17.0) years. Patients accessing COVID-era remote visits were more likely to be Asian, Black, or Hispanic individuals (24 934 pre-COVID in-person visits [28.6%] vs 19 742 COVID-era in-person visits [26.5%] vs 3633 COVID-era video visits [30.4%] vs 1435 COVID-era telephone visits [35.0%]; P < .001 for all comparisons), have private insurance (34 063 pre-COVID in-person visits [39.1%] vs 25 474 COVID-era in-person visits [34.2%] vs 2562 COVID-era video visits [54.3%] vs 4264 COVID-era telephone visits [41.1%]; P < .001 for COVID-era in-person vs video and COVID-era in-person vs telephone), and have cardiovascular comorbidities (eg, hypertension: 37 166 pre-COVID in-person visits [42.6%] vs 31 359 COVID-era in-person visits [42.1%] vs 2006 COVID-era video visits [42.5%] vs 5181 COVID-era telephone visits [49.9%]; P < .001 for COVID-era in-person vs telephone; and heart failure: 14 319 pre-COVID in-person visits [16.4%] vs 10 488 COVID-era in-person visits [14.1%] vs 1172 COVID-era video visits [24.8%] vs 2674 COVID-era telephone visits [25.8%]; P < .001 for COVID-era in-person vs video and COVID-era in-person vs telephone). After adjusting for patient and visit characteristics and in comparison with pre-COVID in-person visits, during video and telephone visits, clinicians had lower odds of ordering any medication (COVID-era in-person: odds ratio [OR], 0.62 [95% CI, 0.60-0.64], COVID-era video: OR, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.20-0.24]; COVID-era telephone: OR, 0.14 [95% CI, 0.13-0.15]) or tests, such as electrocardiograms (COVID-era in-person: OR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.58-0.62]; COVID-era video: OR, 0.03 [95% CI, 0.02-0.04]; COVID-era telephone: OR, 0.02 [95% CI, 0.01-0.03]) or echocardiograms (COVID-era in-person: OR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.18-1.24]; COVID-era video: OR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.42-0.52]; COVID-era telephone: OR, 0.28 [95% CI, 0.25-0.31]). Conclusions and Relevance: Patients who were Asian, Black, or Hispanic, had private insurance, and had at least one of several cardiovascular comorbidities used remote cardiovascular care more frequently in the COVID-era period. Clinician ordering of diagnostic testing and medications consistently decreased when comparing pre-COVID vs COVID-era and in-person vs remote visits. Further studies are needed to clarify whether these decreases represent a reduction in the overuse of tests and medications vs an underuse of indicated testing and prescribing.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial , COVID-19 , Cardiologia/métodos , Pandemias , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Padrões de Prática Médica , Telemedicina/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Estudos Transversais , Etnicidade , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Seguro Saúde , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , SARS-CoV-2
13.
Circulation ; 143(8): e254-e743, 2021 02 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33501848

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The American Heart Association, in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health, annually reports the most up-to-date statistics related to heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular risk factors, including core health behaviors (smoking, physical activity, diet, and weight) and health factors (cholesterol, blood pressure, and glucose control) that contribute to cardiovascular health. The Statistical Update presents the latest data on a range of major clinical heart and circulatory disease conditions (including stroke, congenital heart disease, rhythm disorders, subclinical atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, heart failure, valvular disease, venous disease, and peripheral artery disease) and the associated outcomes (including quality of care, procedures, and economic costs). METHODS: The American Heart Association, through its Statistics Committee, continuously monitors and evaluates sources of data on heart disease and stroke in the United States to provide the most current information available in the annual Statistical Update. The 2021 Statistical Update is the product of a full year's worth of effort by dedicated volunteer clinicians and scientists, committed government professionals, and American Heart Association staff members. This year's edition includes data on the monitoring and benefits of cardiovascular health in the population, an enhanced focus on social determinants of health, adverse pregnancy outcomes, vascular contributions to brain health, the global burden of cardiovascular disease, and further evidence-based approaches to changing behaviors related to cardiovascular disease. RESULTS: Each of the 27 chapters in the Statistical Update focuses on a different topic related to heart disease and stroke statistics. CONCLUSIONS: The Statistical Update represents a critical resource for the lay public, policy makers, media professionals, clinicians, health care administrators, researchers, health advocates, and others seeking the best available data on these factors and conditions.


Assuntos
Cardiopatias/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , American Heart Association , Pressão Sanguínea , Colesterol/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/patologia , Dieta Saudável , Exercício Físico , Carga Global da Doença , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Cardiopatias/economia , Cardiopatias/mortalidade , Cardiopatias/patologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Obesidade/patologia , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Fumar , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/economia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/mortalidade , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/patologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
14.
ASAIO J ; 67(4): 436-442, 2021 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32740124

RESUMO

Patient adherence is vital to the success of durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS), and the pre-MCS assessment of adherence by the multidisciplinary advanced heart failure team is a critical component of the evaluation. We assessed the impact of a high-risk psychosocial assessment before durable MCS implantations on post-MCS outcomes. Between January 2010 and April 2018, 319 patients underwent durable MCS at our center. We excluded those who died or were transplanted before discharge. The remaining 203 patients were grouped by pre-MCS psychosocial assessment: high-risk (26; 12.8%) versus acceptable risk (177; 87.2%). We compared clinical characteristics, nonadherence, and outcomes between groups. High-risk patients were younger (48 vs. 56; p = 0.006) and more often on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at durable MCS placement (26.9% vs. 9.0%; p = 0.007). These patients had a higher incidence of post-MCS nonadherence including missed clinic appointments, incorrect medication administration, and use of alcohol and illicit drugs. After a mean follow-up of 15.3 months, 100% of high-risk patients had unplanned hospitalizations compared with 76.8% of acceptable-risk patients. Per year, high-risk patients had a median of 2.9 hospitalizations per year vs. 1.2 hospitalizations per year in acceptable-risk patients. While not significant, there were more driveline infections over the follow-up period in high-risk patients (27% vs. 14.7%), deaths (27% vs. 18%), and fewer heart transplants (53.8% vs. 63.8%).The pre-MCS psychosocial assessment is associated with post-MCS evidence of nonadherence and unplanned hospitalizations. Attention to pre-MCS assessment of psychosocial risk factors is essential to optimize durable MCS outcomes.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/psicologia , Coração Auxiliar/psicologia , Cooperação do Paciente/psicologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Psicologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
17.
Circulation ; 135(5): 426-439, 2017 01 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27927714

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although age-associated changes in left ventricular diastolic function are well recognized, limited data exist characterizing measures of diastolic function in older adults, including both reference ranges reflecting the older adult population and prognostically relevant values for incident heart failure (HF), as well as their associations with circulating biomarkers of HF risk. METHODS: Among 5801 elderly participants in the ARIC study (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities; age range, 67-90 years; mean age, 76±5 years; 42% male; 21% black), we determined the continuous association of diastolic measures (tissue Doppler imaging [TDI] e', E/e', and left atrial size) with concomitant N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and subsequent HF hospitalization or death. We also determined sex-specific 10th and 90th percentile limits for these measures using quantile regression in 401 participants free of prevalent cardiovascular disease and risk factors. RESULTS: Each measure of diastolic function was robustly associated with N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and incident HF or death. ARIC-based reference limits for TDI e' (4.6 and 5.2 cm/s for septal and lateral TDI e', respectively) were substantially lower than guideline cut points (7 and 10 cm/s, respectively), whereas E/e' and left atrial size demonstrated good agreement with guideline cut points. TDI e' was nonlinearly associated with incident HF or death, with inflection points for risk supportive of ARIC-based limits. ARIC-based limits for diastolic function improved risk discrimination over guideline-based cut points based on the integrated discrimination improvement (P<0.001) and continuous net reclassification improvement (P<0.001), reclassifying 42% of the study population as having normal diastolic function. We replicate these findings in the Copenhagen City Heart Study. With these limits, 46% had normal diastolic function and were at low risk of HF hospitalization or death (1%/y over a mean 1.7-year follow-up), 49% had 1 or 2 abnormal measures and were at intermediate risk (2.4%/y), and all 3 diastolic measures were abnormal in 5% who were at high risk (7.5%/y). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that left ventricular longitudinal relaxation velocity declines as a part of healthy aging and is largely prognostically benign. The use of age-based normative values when considering an elderly population improves the risk discrimination of diastolic measures for incident HF or death.


Assuntos
Aterosclerose/complicações , Ecocardiografia Doppler/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Função Ventricular Esquerda
18.
Circ Heart Fail ; 9(9)2016 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27623770

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The noninvasive assessment of altered myocardium in patients with genetic mutations that are associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) remains challenging. In this pilot study, we evaluated whether a novel echocardiography-based assessment of myocardial microstructure, the signal intensity coefficient (SIC), could detect tissue-level alterations in HCM sarcomere mutation carriers with and without left ventricular hypertrophy. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 3 groups of genotyped individuals: sarcomere mutation carriers with left ventricular hypertrophy (clinical HCM; n=36), mutation carriers with normal left ventricular wall thickness (subclinical HCM; n=28), and healthy controls (n=10). We compared measurements of echocardiographic SIC with validated assessments of cardiac microstructural alteration, including cardiac magnetic resonance measures of interstitial fibrosis (extracellular volume fraction), as well as serum biomarkers (NTproBNP, hs-cTnI, and PICP). In age-, sex-, and familial relation-adjusted analyses, the SIC was quantitatively different across subjects with overt HCM, subclinical HCM, and healthy controls (P<0.001). Compared with controls, the SIC was 61% higher in overt HCM and 47% higher in subclinical HCM (P<0.001 for both). The SIC was significantly correlated with extracellular volume (r=0.72; P<0.01), with left ventricular mass and E' velocity (r=0.45, -0.60, respectively; P<0.01 for both), and with serum NTproBNP levels (r=0.36; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the SIC could serve as a noninvasive quantitative tool for assessing altered myocardial tissue characteristics in patients with genetic mutations associated with HCM. Further studies are needed to determine whether the SIC could be used to identify subclinical changes in patients at risk for HCM and to evaluate the effects of interventions.


Assuntos
Cardiomiopatia Hipertrófica/diagnóstico por imagem , Ecocardiografia Doppler/métodos , Hipertrofia Ventricular Esquerda/diagnóstico por imagem , Mutação , Miocárdio/patologia , Adulto , Doenças Assintomáticas , Biomarcadores/sangue , Cardiomiopatia Hipertrófica/sangue , Cardiomiopatia Hipertrófica/genética , Cardiomiopatia Hipertrófica/patologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Humanos , Hipertrofia Ventricular Esquerda/sangue , Hipertrofia Ventricular Esquerda/genética , Hipertrofia Ventricular Esquerda/patologia , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Imagem Cinética por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Fenótipo , Projetos Piloto , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Adulto Jovem
19.
Heart ; 102(11): 825-31, 2016 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26917537

RESUMO

Despite recent progress in identifying and narrowing the gaps in cardiovascular outcomes between men and women, general understanding of how and why cardiovascular disease presentations differ between the sexes remains limited. Sex-specific patterns of cardiac and vascular ageing play an important role and, in fact, begin very early in life. Differences between the sexes in patterns of age-related cardiac remodelling are associated with the relatively greater prevalence in women than in men of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Similarly, sex variation in how vascular structure and function change with ageing contributes to differences between men and women in how coronary artery disease manifests typically or atypically over the adult life course. Both hormonal and non-hormonal factors underlie sex differences in cardiovascular ageing and the development of age-related disease. The midlife withdrawal of endogenous oestrogen appears to augment the age-related increase in cardiovascular risk seen in postmenopausal compared with premenopausal women. However, when compared with intrinsic biological differences between men and women that are present throughout life, this menopausal transition may not be as substantial an actor in determining cardiovascular outcomes.


Assuntos
Envelhecimento , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Sistema Cardiovascular/fisiopatologia , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Hemodinâmica , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Envelhecimento/sangue , Animais , Doenças Cardiovasculares/sangue , Doenças Cardiovasculares/fisiopatologia , Sistema Cardiovascular/metabolismo , Estrogênios/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Menopausa , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Adulto Jovem
20.
Am J Emerg Med ; 33(11): 1552-6, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26123928

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary edema is a common sign of heart failure and can be quantified by counting vertical artifacts (B-lines) on lung ultrasound (LUS). The primary aim of this study was to compare a pocket size ultrasound device to high-end ultrasound systems on the measured number of B-lines. We also compared the impact of different-length ultrasound clips on the measured number of B-lines. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 21 hospitalized patients with heart failure (81% men; median age, 73; 71% Caucasian) who underwent concurrent 8- and 4-zone LUS using both a pocket ultrasound device and a high-end ultrasound system. For the 4-zone scanning method, the median B line number was 2 (interquartile range, 1-4) for the pocket device and 3 (1-5) for the high-end system (P = .67). For the 8-zone method, the median B-line number was 4 (2-7) for the pocket device and 5 (3-7) for the high-end system (P = .18). A higher number of B-lines was identified on the 4- vs 2-second LUS clips (P < .001 for 4 zones, P = .001 for 8 zones), and on the 6- vs 4-second LUS clips (P=0.057 for 4 zones, P=0.018 for 8 zones). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest significant differences based on LUS clip duration rather than the type of ultrasound device used, with respect to the number of B-lines detectable in patients with heart failure. These factors should be considered in the design and reporting of LUS studies and in longitudinal assessments of heart failure patients.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico por imagem , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Edema Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia/instrumentação , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/complicações , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Edema Pulmonar/etiologia , Ultrassonografia/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA