Trends in the Cost and Utilization of Omalizumab in the Medicare Population: 2013-2017.

Background: Omalizumab has been demonstrated to be effective in treating chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and was FDA approved for this indication in 2014. Previous work has shown that access to injectable biologics varies across US counties. In the present study we evaluate geographic and temporal trends in the utilization of omalizumab in the Medicare population by dermatologists, with its use by allergists and pulmonologists as comparators. Methods: We analyzed year-over-year trends in omalizumab utilization across geographic regions using the Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data: Part D files. Results: Utilization of omalizumab by dermatologists increased rapidly after its FDA approval, from 0.08 claims/100,000 enrollees totaling $209/100,000 enrollees in 2014 to 1.45 claims/100,000 enrollees totaling $3115/100,000 enrollees in 2017. Nonetheless, prescribing dermatologists were present in only 2.8% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 2.0%-3.9%) and 0.2% (95% CI: 0.0%-0.5%) of metropolitan and non-metropolitan counties, respectively, in 2017, demonstrating limited availability, especially in non-metropolitan counties. Similarly, prescribers of any specialty were available in 32.9% (95% CI: 30.2%-35.6%) and 3.8% (95% CI: 3.1%-4.8%) of metropolitan and non-metropolitan counties, respectively, in 2017. Conclusions: Our data suggest that despite increasing omalizumab utilization, there remains a lack of access across many counties, particularly in non-metropolitan regions. Efforts to expand omalizumab prescriber accessibility in these counties may improve outcomes for patients with CSU.

Utilization, cost, and provider trends in patch testing among Medicare beneficiaries in the United States from 2012 to 2017.

BACKGROUND: Patch testing is the best diagnostic test for allergic contact dermatitis. However, there is presently a lack of data on the test's geographic availability and the characteristics of the providers offering this test across the United States. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the geographic variation in the availability of patch testing for the Medicare population and to characterize the temporal trends of patch testing cost, use, and provider specialty from 2012 to 2017. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of the Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data from 2012 to 2017. RESULTS: As of 2017, patch testing was available in 20.3% of metropolitan counties and in 1.1% of nonmetropolitan counties. From 2012 to 2017 in metropolitan regions, the number of beneficiaries tested by dermatologists grew by an average annual growth rate of 1.84%, whereas those tested by allergists grew by an average annual growth rate of 20.31%. Most providers that averaged use of 80 or more patches per beneficiary were dermatologists (76.3%). LIMITATIONS: Analysis was restricted to Medicare Part B claims; data were unavailable on individuals with commercial insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the increase in patch testing utilization from 2012 to 2017 has been in metropolitan regions. Although growth was especially prominent among allergists in metropolitan counties, the majority of providers performing comprehensive patch testing were dermatologists.

Early Adoption of Dupilumab in the Medicare Population in 2017.

Background: In March of 2017, dupilumab became the first FDA approved injectable biologic for treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). As the first drug in this class for AD, dupilumab has revolutionized the disease's treatment and improved patient outcomes significantly. Previous work has demonstrated that dermatologic injectable biologics are not uniformly accessible to patients in the US, and that patients in more rural regions are less likely to have access to these medications. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the early utilization trends of dupilumab for the Medicare population in the first year of its FDA approval (2017). Methods: Retrospective cohort study of the Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data. Counties were categorized by Rural-Urban Continuum Codes (RUCC) based on size, extent of urbanization, and proximity to a metropolitan (metro) area as defined by the National Center for Health Statistics Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties. Results: There were 142 individuals who prescribed dupilumab at least 10 times in 2017, 80% of whom were dermatologists. Of these providers, 130 (91.5%) practiced in metropolitan (metro) counties and 12 practiced in non-metro counties. There were 14 cities with two or more dupilumab prescribers, with highest numbers observed in New York, NY (8 providers); Philadelphia, PA (6 providers); Phoenix, AZ (5 providers); and Norfolk, VA (4 providers). Conclusions: There are differences in access to dupilumab in the Medicare population based on geographic location in the US. Trends of decreased access to novel dermatologic biologics in rural areas of the US may begin at their introduction to the market, identifying a potential target for future interventions to equalize access.

Untreated oral cavity cancer: Long-term survival and factors associated with treatment refusal.

OBJECTIVE: Oral cavity cancer is the most common malignant disease of the head and neck. The natural course of the disease is poorly characterized and unavailable for patient consideration during initial treatment planning. Our primary objective was to outline this natural history, with a secondary aim of identifying predictors of treatment refusal. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of adult patients with oral cavity cancer who refused surgery that was recommended by their physician in the National Cancer Database. METHODS: Demographic, tumor, and survival variables were included in the analyses. Multivariate Cox regressions as well as univariate Kaplan-Meier analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Patients who were older, uninsured, had government insurance, or had more advanced disease were more likely to go untreated. Survival among untreated patients was poor, but there was a small proportion of patients surviving long term. Five-year survival rates ranged from 31.1% among early-stage patients to 12.6% among stage 4 patients. CONCLUSION: Although the natural course of oral cavity cancer carries a poor prognosis, there are a number of patients with longer-than-expected survival. The survival estimates may provide supplemental information for patients deciding whether to pursue treatment. In addition to age and extent of disease, system factors such as insurance status and facility case volume are associated with a patient's likelihood of refusing treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:664-669, 2018.