Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Korean J Intern Med ; 31(6): 1030-1041, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27809449

RESUMO

In September 2011, the Korean Society of Hematology Lymphoma Working Party held a nationwide conference to establish a consensus for assessing bone marrow (BM) involvement in patients with lymphoma. At this conference, many clinicians, hematopathologists, and diagnostic hematologists discussed various topics for a uniform consensus in the evaluation process to determine whether the BM is involved. Now that the discussion has matured sufficiently to be published, we herein describe the consensus reached and limitations in current methods for assessing BM involvement in patients with lymphoma.


Assuntos
Exame de Medula Óssea/métodos , Medula Óssea/patologia , Linfoma/patologia , Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Biópsia , Medula Óssea/química , Medula Óssea/imunologia , Consenso , Análise Citogenética , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Citometria de Fluxo , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Linfoma/química , Linfoma/genética , Linfoma/imunologia , Gradação de Tumores , Valor Preditivo dos Testes
2.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 47(4): 683-7, 2006 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16690527

RESUMO

The diagnostic criteria of acute erythroid leukemias (AEL) has been revised by WHO in 2001. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) published a set of standardized diagnostic and response criteria for acute myeloid leukemia in 1990, which was revised in 2003. The aim of the present study was to establish the best criteria for therapeutic response assessment in the newly classified AEL and evaluate patient outcomes. Fifty-two patients with AEL as defined by the new WHO criteria were evaluated in this study. The following seven indices for therapeutic response assessment were evaluated: (i) NCI criteria (myeloblast percentage among total nucleated cells (TNC) and cellularity); (ii) myeloblast percentage among non-erythroid cells (NEC) and cellularity; (iii) erythroid series percentage among TNC; (iv) pronormoblast percentage among erythroid cells; (v) ratio of pronormoblasts and blasts; (vi) maturation arrest index; and (vii) disappearance of erythroid dysplasia. Complete remission (CR) patients with <5% of myeloblast/NEC (NEC-CR) showed significantly longer overall survival periods (mean 55.8 months) compared to CR patients with >5% myeloblast/NEC (mean 11.7 months, P = 0.006). NEC-CR patients also had longer event-free survival (median 16.4 months) compared to patients with >5% and <20% of myeloblast/NEC (median 6.2 months) (P = 0.044). The other indices for therapeutic response assessment are not significant for predictability of relapse and outcomes. Therefore, we recommend that the myeloblast percentage among NEC be used instead of myeloblast percentage among TNC for therapeutic response assessment in AEL.


Assuntos
Células Precursoras de Granulócitos/citologia , Leucemia Eritroblástica Aguda/classificação , Leucemia Eritroblástica Aguda/terapia , Oncologia/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Oncologia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA