Cost-effectiveness of substituting dual-energy CT for SPECT in the assessment of myocardial perfusion for the workup of coronary artery disease.

PURPOSE: We compared cost-effectiveness and potential lifetime benefits of using dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for myocardial perfusion assessment instead of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for the workup of coronary artery disease (CAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A decision and simulation model was developed to estimate cost and health effects of using DECT myocardial perfusion imaging instead of SPECT for identifying patients in need of invasive imaging and possible revascularization. The model was based on the performance indices of stress/rest DECT compared with stress/rest SPECT for detecting myocardial perfusion deficits in 50 patients (mean age 61±10 years) with CAD. Stress/rest perfusion and delayed enhancement cardiac MRI served as reference standard. For DECT a reimbursement of US$1700 was assumed but costs of cardiac MRI were not included in the model. All other actual healthcare costs in these patients were derived from MUSC's hospital billing system. RESULTS: Compared with cardiac MRI, DECT (versus SPECT) had 90% (85%) sensitivity and 71% (58%) specificity for identifying patients with obstructive CAD. Compared with the no imaging and no treatment strategy, routine SPECT gained 13.49 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$3557 (in 2010) per QALY. In comparison, DECT ICER was lower (US$3.191 per QALY, p=0.0002) and an additional 0.64 QALYs was obtained (total of 14.13 QALYs) if compared with the SPECT strategy as well as the no imaging and no treatment strategy. CONCLUSION: Using DECT as the first-line imaging test for myocardial perfusion for the workup of patients with CAD has the potential to provide gains in QALYs, while lowering costs if compared to routine myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Comparison of dual-energy computed tomography of the heart with single photon emission computed tomography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis and of the myocardial blood supply.

To evaluate the performance of dual-energy computed tomography (CT) for integrative imaging of the coronary artery morphology and the myocardial blood supply, 36 patients (15 women, mean age 57 +/- 11 years) with equivocal or incongruous single photon emission CT (SPECT) results were investigated by a single-contrast medium-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographic-gated dual-energy CT (DECT) scan with simultaneous acquisition of high and low x-ray spectra. Thirteen patients subsequently underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA). The DECT data were used to reconstruct anatomic coronary CT angiographic images and to map the myocardial iodine distribution within the left ventricular myocardium. Two independent observers analyzed all DECT studies for stenosis and myocardial iodine defects. A segmental comparison was performed between the stress/rest SPECT perfusion defects and DECT iodine defects and between the ICA and coronary CT angiographic findings for stenosis. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were estimated, along with the kappa statistics. Overall, DECT had 92% sensitivity and 93% specificity, with 93% accuracy for detecting any type of myocardial perfusion defect seen on SPECT. Contrast defects at DECT correctly identified 85 (96%) of 89 fixed and 60 (88%) of 68 reversible myocardial perfusion defects. The interobserver agreement was very good (weighted kappa = 0.87). Compared with ICA, coronary CT angiography had 90% sensitivity, 94% specificity, and 93% accuracy for the detection of >50% stenosis. In conclusion, our initial experience suggests that DECT, as a single examination, might be promising for the integrative analysis of the coronary artery morphology and the myocardial blood supply and is in good agreement with ICA and SPECT.

Integrated assessment of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion using a retractable SPECT camera combined with 64-slice CT: initial experience.

We evaluated a prototype SPECT system integrated with multidetector row CT (MDCT) for obtaining complementary information on coronary anatomy and hemodynamic lesion significance. Twenty-five consecutive patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent routine SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). All patients also underwent repeat MPI with a mobile SPECT unit which could be attached to a 64-slice MDCT system. Coronary CT angiography (cCTA) was performed without repositioning the patient. Investigational MPI was compared with routine MPI for detection of myocardial perfusion defects (PD). Two observers diagnosed presence or absence of CAD based on MPI alone, cCTA alone, and based on combined MPI and cCTA with fused image display. In 22/24 patients investigative MPI corresponded with routine MPI (r = 0.80). Stenosis >or= 50% at cCTA was detected in 6/24 patients. Six out of 24 patients had PD at regular MPI. Three of these six patients had no significant stenosis at cCTA. Three out of 19 patients with normal MPI studies had significant stenosis at cCTA. Our initial experience indicates that the integration of SPECT MPI with cCTA is technically feasible and enables the comprehensive evaluation of coronary artery anatomy and myocardial perfusion with a single instrumental setup.

Quantitative assessment of pericardial effusion volume by two-dimensional echocardiography.

The clinical applicability of a method for quantifying pericardial effusion (PE) was studied. The pericardial and cardiac volumes were determined from border tracings of 2-dimensional echocardiograms fitted with 3-dimensional disk models. The PE volume was the difference between pericardial and cardiac volumes. A phantom study included 54 cases with different volumes and viewing geometry showed a correlation coefficient r = 0.98 and an accuracy of +/- 6%. A clinical study included 20 cases showing that the estimated PE volume correlated well with that drained surgically (between 100 mL and 1200 mL): y = 0.81 x + 120 mL; r = 0.91, P <.0001. The percent error, determined by the standard error of the estimate (114 mL) over mean (548 mL), was 20%. Intraobserver variability was 4% and interobserver variability 6%. The 3-dimensional disk method provides a quick and convenient way to quantify PE from 2-dimensional echocardiograms with acceptable accuracy and reproducibility.