Real-world experience of CAR T-cell therapy in older patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

The emergence of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has changed the treatment landscape for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL); however, real-world experience reporting outcomes among older patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy is limited. We leveraged the 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims database and analyzed outcomes and cost associated with CAR T-cell therapy in 551 older patients (aged ≥65 years) with DLBCL who received CAR T-cell therapy between 2018 and 2020. CAR T-cell therapy was used in third line and beyond in 19% of patients aged 65 to 69 years and 22% among those aged 70 to 74 years, compared with 13% of patients aged ≥75 years. Most patients received CAR T-cell therapy in an inpatient setting (83%), with an average length of stay of 21 days. The median event-free survival (EFS) following CAR T-cell therapy was 7.2 months. Patients aged ≥75 years had significantly shorter EFS compared with patients aged 65 to 69 and 70 to 74 years, with 12-month EFS estimates of 34%, 43%, and 52%, respectively (P = .002). The median overall survival was 17.1 months, and there was no significant difference by age groups. The median total health care cost during the 90-day follow-up was $352 572 and was similar across all age groups. CAR T-cell therapy was associated with favorable effectiveness, but the CAR T-cell therapy use in older patients was low, especially in patients aged ≥75 years, and this age group had a lower rate of EFS, which illustrates the unmet need for more accessible, effective, and tolerable therapy in older patients, especially those aged ≥75 years.

The Impact of Sequence of Therapy for Older Patients With Follicular Lymphoma: SEER-Medicare Analysis.

BACKGROUND: One key clinical challenge remains in how to sequence treatments in follicular lymphoma (FL). The chemoimmunotherapy rituximab cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine (Oncovin), and prednisone (R-CHOP) has been a standard treatment option for two decades. However, there are limited data to suggest in which line R-CHOP should be used for older patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We leveraged population-based surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-medicare data and identified 675 patients aged ≥65 years newly diagnosed with FL from 2000 to 2009 who received R-CHOP in either the first or second line. We estimated restricted mean survival time using Kaplan-Meier curves, propensity scores (PS), and regression models comparing patients who received R-CHOP as a first versus second line. RESULTS: We found that patients who received R-CHOP as first line had significantly longer 9-year RMST than those who received R-CHOP in the second line using Kaplan-Meier curves (P = .01), PS stratification (P = .002), PS matching (P = .005), and the inverse of PS as the treatment weight (P < .0001). The subgroup analyses using linear regression models showed that the 9-year restricted mean survival time of patients who received R-CHOP as the first line was longer in patients aged ≥80 years (P = .002) and with histological grade 1 or 2 (P = .02), compared to those who received R-CHOP as second line. CONCLUSION: R-CHOP given in the first line was associated with longer overall survival compared to R-CHOP given as second line for older patients with FL.