Assessment of antimicrobial resistance laboratory-based surveillance capacity of hospitals in Zambia: findings and implications for system strengthening.

BACKGROUND: A well-established antimicrobial resistance (AMR) laboratory-based surveillance (LBS) is of utmost importance in a country like Zambia which bears a significant proportion of the world's communicable disease burden. This study assessed the capacity of laboratories in selected hospitals to conduct AMR surveillance in Zambia. METHODS: This cross-sectional exploratory study was conducted among eight purposively selected hospitals in Zambia between August 2023 and December 2023. Data were collected using the self-scoring Laboratory Assessment of Antibiotic Resistance Testing Capacity (LAARC) tool. FINDINGS: Of the assessed facilities, none had full capacity to conduct AMR surveillance with varying capacities ranging from moderate (63% (5/8)) to low (38% (3/8)). Some of the barriers of AMR-LBS were the lack of an electronic laboratory information system (63% (5/8)) and the lack of locally generated antibiograms (75% (6/8)). Quality control for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), pathogen identification and media preparation had the lowest overall score among all of the facilities with a score of 14%, 20% and 44%, respectively. The highest overall scores were in specimen processing (79%), data management (78%), specimen collection, transport and management (71%), and safety (70%). Most facilities had standard operating procedures in place but lacked specimen-specific standard operating procedures. CONCLUSION: The absence of laboratories with full capacity to conduct AMR surveillance hinders efforts to combat AMR and further complicates the treatment outcomes of infectious diseases. Establishing and strengthening LBS systems are essential in quantifying the burden of AMR and supporting the development of local antibiograms and treatment guidelines.

Marketing of breast-milk substitutes in Zambia: evaluation of compliance to the international regulatory code.

Background: We sought to assess the level of non-compliance with the International Code of Marketing breast-milk substitutes (BMS) and/or Statutory Instrument (SI) Number 48 of 2006 of the Laws of Zambia in two suburbs, Kalingalinga and Chelstone, in Zambia. Methods: This was a cross sectional survey. Shop owners (80), health workers (8) and mothers (214) were interviewed. BMS labels and advertisements (62) were observed. The primary outcome was mean non-compliance defined as the number of article violations divided by the total 'obtainable' violations. The score ranges from 0 to 1 with 0 representing no violations in all the articles and one representing violations in all the articles. Results: A total of 62 BMS were assessed. The mean non-compliance score by manufacturers in terms of violations in labelling of BMS was 0.33 (SD = 0.28; 95% CI: 0.26, 0.40). These violations were mainly due to labels containing pictures or graphics representing an infant. 80 shops were also assessed with mean non-compliance score in respect of violations in tie-in-sales, special display, and contact with mothers at the shop estimated as 0.14 (SD = 0.14; 95% CI: 0.11, 0.18). Conclusions: Non-compliance with the Code and/or the local SI is high after 10 years of domesticating the Code.