Social determinants of health and adult influenza vaccination: a nationwide claims analysis.

BACKGROUND: The health and economic benefits of the annual influenza vaccine are well documented, yet vaccination rates in the United States missed the Healthy People 2020 goal and remain a focus of Healthy People 2030 efforts. By identifying underlying reasons for low annual influenza vaccination, social elements that need targeting may be identified and could guide future interventions or policy development to achieve vaccination goals and improve overall public health. OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of certain social determinants of health on adherence to annual influenza vaccination in American adults. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort analysis using data from IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database and national Medicare 5% sample data from 2013 to 2016. Study eligibility criteria included adults (aged 18 years and older) who were continuously enrolled for 3 influenza seasons between 2013 and 2016. Receipt of the influenza vaccine was counted over 3 consecutive influenza seasons, and select social determinants were extracted from publicly available sources. Patient characteristics, health resource utilization, and selected social determinants of health were included in bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to determine their association with annual influenza vaccination. RESULTS: 6,694,571 adults across employer-sponsored and Medicare coverage groups were analyzed, of which 14.7% of Medicare-enrolled adults and 9.2% of commercially enrolled adults were vaccinated in all 3 seasons. Higher proportions of vaccine adherence (ie, all 3 seasons) were observed among females (9.6% vs 8.7% [commercial], 15.0% vs 14.4% [Medicare]), the immunocompromised (11.8% vs 8.3% [commercial], 15.9% vs 13.6% [Medicare]), rural residents (10.5% vs 9.0% [commercial], 15.4% vs 14.6% [Medicare]; all P < 0.0001), and those enrolled in a high-deductible health plan (10.3%). Multivariable logistic regression models indicated that the odds of vaccine adherence tended to be higher in areas of higher poverty (OR=1.012; 95% CI = 1.01-1.02 [commercial], OR=1.01; 95% CI = 1.01-1.01 [Medicare]) yet lower in areas with higher proportions of Democratic voters (OR=0.998; 95% CI = 0.998-0.998 [commercial], OR = 0.996; 95% CI = 0.996-0.997 [Medicare]). Among commercially insured adults, the odds of vaccine adherence were higher in areas of higher health literacy (OR=1.036; 95% CI = 1.036-1.037), but this effect was not observed among Medicare members. Conversely, the odds of vaccine adherence increased as the proportion of those residing in areas of limited Internet access increased (OR=1.007; 95% CI = 1.004-1.010) among Medicare members only. CONCLUSIONS: Key social determinants of health are important factors of vaccine adherence and can guide policy and intervention efforts toward addressing potential hesitancy. A deeper assessment of other contributing social factors is needed in seasonal influenza and other vaccines to better interpret the vaccine-seeking behaviors of adults. DISCLOSURES: This study received no outside funding. Gatwood, Hagemann, Hohmeier, and Chiu declare vaccine-related grant funding from Merck & Co. and GlaxoSmithKline for vaccine research unrelated to the current study. Ramachandran declares vaccine-related grant funding from Glaxo-SmithKline for research unrelated to the current study. Shuvo and Behal have nothing to disclose. Findings described in this study were presented as a poster and podium at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Nexus 2020 Virtual meeting, October 19-23, 2020.

Correlates of Early Prenatal Care Access among U.S. Women: Data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS).

OBJECTIVES: Early first trimester prenatal counseling could reduce adverse maternal and child health outcomes. Existing literature does not identify the length of time between suspecting pregnancy and attending their first prenatal visit. Identifying this potential window for change is critical for clinical practice, intervention programming and policy change. METHODS: The study sample was composed of women in the United States who responded to the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring Systems survey in 2016, for the following questions-when they first suspected pregnancy, when they attended their first prenatal visit, were they able to receive prenatal care as early as they wished, and perceived barriers to receiving prenatal care. RESULTS: On average, participants became certain they were pregnant at 6.0 (SE = 0.1) weeks gestation, while participants reported having their first prenatal care visit at 9.3 (SE = 0.1) weeks, with clear health disparities by race, age, WIC participation, education level, and marital status. About 15% of women reported not receiving prenatal care as early as they wished. Structural or financial barriers in the health care system were common: 38.1% reported that no appointments available, 28.2% reported not having money or insurance to pay for the visit, 27.3% reported that the doctor or health plan would not start care, and 22.5% reported not having a Medicaid card. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study illustrates a window for opportunity to provide earlier prenatal care, which would facilitate earlier implementation of prenatal counseling. Strategies to address barriers to care on the patient, provider and systemic levels, particularly among vulnerable population groups, are warranted. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS SUBJECT?: Seeking prenatal care early is associated with better health outcomes for women and infants. A window of opportunity exists between suspecting pregnancy and attending a first prenatal visit. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS?: Clear health disparities were apparent in both recognizing their pregnancies, and receiving early prenatal care by race, age, WIC participation, education level, and marital status. About 15% of women reported not receiving prenatal care as early as they wished, and many attributed this later care to structural or financial barriers in the health care system.

The role of social determinants in timely herpes zoster vaccination among older American adults.

CDC recommends that U.S. adults ≥50 years receive the herpes zoster (HZ) vaccine; but few are vaccinated at the recommended age. Little is known about how social determinants of health (SDH) influence timely vaccination. This retrospective observational study included U.S. adults aged ≥50 years who were vaccinated against HZ between 2014 and 2016 from IBM MarketScan commercial claims and Medicare supplemental databases. The cohort was classified into three groups based on age of vaccination: earlier (50-59 years), timely (60-64 years), and later (65+ years). Select SDH data from publicly-available sources were linked and included in multinomial logistic regression assessing the impact of SDH on timely vaccination. The final cohort comprised 549,544 individuals, 49.5% of whom were vaccinated at the age of 60-64. Odds of later HZ vaccination increased with higher poverty (OR: 1.035, 95% CI: 1.031-1.038), more democratic voters (OR: 1.011, 95% CI: 1.010-1.012), and lack of Internet access (OR: 1.028, 95% CI: 1.024-1.032), but decreased with higher health literacy (OR: 0.971, 95% CI: 0.970-0.973). Conversely, higher health literacy and lower poverty were associated with higher odds of earlier vaccination. Being male, not receiving a seasonal influenza vaccine, and higher healthcare utilization were associated with later vaccination. Individuals on an EPO/PPO vs. HMO plan, or who resided in regions other than the Northeast were more likely to receive the vaccine earlier. This study demonstrates the influence of SDH on time of HZ vaccination, but further research is needed to fully understand the impact of SDH on vaccination.

Pneumococcal vaccination in older adults: An initial analysis of social determinants of health and vaccine uptake.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the potential influence of social determinants of health on pneumococcal vaccination in older American adults. METHODS: This study used nationwide, US Medicare claims data from 2013 to 2016 to assess uptake of pneumococcal vaccination among adults in the first year after turning age 65. Patients were followed from the point of being 65 years of age and initially enrolled in traditional fee-for-service Medicare or a Medicare Advantage plan through the subsequent year and observed for pneumococcal vaccination in outpatient clinics and pharmacies. Publicly-available data on select social determinants of health were incorporated and guided by the World Health Organization vaccine hesitancy matrix. Logistic regression determined predictors of vaccination while controlling clinical and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 307,488 and 74,995 adults aged 65 years were identified from Medicare Advantage and Medicare fee-for-service claims, respectively, and 21.1% of Medicare Advantage and 38.2% of Medicare fee-for-service patients received a pneumococcal vaccine in the first year after turning 65. Those residing in urban areas had a higher likelihood of pneumococcal vaccination in both the Medicare Advantage (OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.267-1.344) and Medicare fee-for-service (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.450-1.615) cohorts. Additionally, residing in areas of higher health literacy or communities with more democratic voters were consistently associated with a higher odds of pneumococcal vaccination regardless of Medicare type. Results also pointed to a synergistic relationship between receiving the influenza vaccine and also being vaccinated against pneumococcal disease. CONCLUSION: Social determinants of health, including local health literacy, poverty, residing in more liberal areas, and access to information, may be influencing the pneumococcal vaccine-related decisions of older adults. However, additional factors associated with the vaccine hesitancy matrix and more granular data (e.g., zip code-level) are needed to fully determine the impact in this and other vaccines recommended in older adults.