Assessment of Donation Potential After Circulatory Death as the First Step in Implementing and Running a Hospital Program of Organ Procurement.

BACKGROUND: In Poland the potential for organ donation from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors is not known. This assessment will allow the hospital to create a quality organ harvesting system from this group of donors. AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the DCD potential based on retrospective analysis of hospital deaths at Hospital Infant Jesus in Warsaw. METHODS: Documentation of 718 deceased patients from 2010 to 2014 was analyzed. This population could be classified as potential DCD donors in IIb category. The deceased's characteristics were analyzed while undergoing the qualification process for DCD. The analysis was to confirm the presence or absence of factors disqualifying kidneys from donation and transplantation. Data from particular departments and from the entire hospital were analyzed. RESULTS: The total number of deaths was 718. Excluding factors from the DCD donation process were found in 664 cases (92%), mainly age >60 and concomitant diseases. The rest of the patients (n = 54.8%) did not have factors that would exclude DCD donation. Group characteristics are given in detail. SUMMARY: The attempt to measure donation potential was done at the Hospital of the Infant Jesus in Warsaw, a large, multispecialty hospital with intensive organ donation and transplantation programs. Results show a potential for DCD donation (54 potential donations over the last 4years), which allows us to create a quality system and algorithms for organ donation after circulation death.

Drug Susceptibility Assessment in Stenotrophomonas Maltophilia Strains Isolated From the Blood of Organ Transplantation Recipients in a Warsaw Teaching Hospital During 2011 to 2014.

BACKGROUND: Blood infections with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative carbapenem-resistant bacilli are particularly dangerous and challenging to treat in organ transplant recipients. Resistance to carbapenems may be acquired, for example, in Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas, or Acinetobacter spp. or innate, for example, in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. The purpose of this study was to analyze blood infections caused by S maltophilia in organ transplant recipients and to compare drug susceptibility of these bacteria and the same species isolated from the blood of other inpatients. METHODS: A total of 26 S maltophilia strains isolated from blood samples of 26 patients (including 14 liver or kidney transplant recipients) hospitalized during 2011 to 2014 were evaluated in this study. Antibiotic susceptibility was determined via E-test and disk diffusion methods. RESULTS: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains isolated from blood exhibited sensitivity to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (100%), levofloxacin (96.2%), ciprofloxacin (92.3%), ticarcillin/clavulanic acid (80.8%), and ceftazidime (53.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Because appropriate antibiotic therapy in the case of S maltophilia differs from the standard empirical therapy administered in the case of most other Gram-negative bacilli, early identification of this pathogen is of particular significance. The use of antibiotics to which this pathogen is sensitive eliminates the infection and helps avoid graft loss.

Assessment of kidneys procured from expanded criteria donors before transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Using expanded criteria donor (ECD) organs is 1 strategy to make more organs available for transplant. To reduce the number of posttransplant complications and failures, there is a need to create a comprehensive system of evaluation before transplantation, especially for kidneys harvested from ECD. The aim of this study was to assess the results of kidneys procured from ECD seeking to discover the most useful factors for kidney evaluation before transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-two patients received cadaveric renal transplants between January 1, 2006, and August 31, 2008. We collected data on donors, recipients, and perfusion parameters. We analyzed patient and graft survivals, as well as immediate, delayed, and slow graft function. Kidney recipient function was assessed by serum creatinine concentrations and by creatinine clearance calculated according to the Cockroft-Gault formula. Renal biopsy specimens were obtained in the perioperative periods 147 cases. RESULTS: The overall 1-year graft survival was 86.9%. More than 25% of transplanted kidneys were harvested from ECD. There were no significant differences in patient survival between recipients of standard criteria donor kidneys (RSCDK) versus of expanded criteria donor kidneys (RECDK). One-year graft survival was higher among the RSCDK group than the RECDK group, namely, 94.4% versus 62.5%, (P = .004). There were no differences in the incidence of primary nonfunction or in delayed graft function between the groups. RECDK were more likely to show slow graft function (69.2% vs 37.8%; P = .033). A lower graft survival at 6 months after transplantation was observed among organs harvested from ECD compared with standard criteria donor (SCD) kidneys who showed histologic lesions or a flow at the fourth hour of machine perfusion below 0.4 mL/g. Using a logistic regression model, chronic histologic changes were shown to influence kidney survival at 6 months after transplantation. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in patient survival between recipients of kidneys harvested from expanded versus standard criteria donors. ECD kidneys displayed lower graft survival rates. There was no significant difference in the incidence of delayed graft function between recipients of kidneys harvested from expanded versus standard criteria donors. Pretransplant evaluation of ECD kidneys should include 3 variables: donor parameters, histologic findings, and machine perfusion parameters.

The assessment of residual kidney function after living donor nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND: The number of patients on the waiting list for kidney transplantation is increasing as a result of the cadaveric donor shortage. One way to expand the pool is living donor transplantation. However, only 2% of kidney transplants in Poland come from living-related donors. AIM: We sought to assess residual renal function, incidence of hypertension, and proteinuria among living kidney donors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2004 and 2007, we performed 46 living donor open nephrectomies. The mean age of the kidney donor was 39 years (range, 25-57). The donors were predominantly females (61%). Mean hospitalization time was 8 days (range, 4-22). Nine donors did not report for follow-up visits. The observation periods ranged from 1 to 24 months. Physical examination, blood and urine tests, as well as ultrasound scans were performed before nephrectomy and at every follow-up visit (1, 3, 12, and 24 months post operatively). RESULTS: Mean creatinine concentration was higher at 3 months after nephrectomy than preoperatively (P < .05). Mean creatinine clearance according to Cockroft-Gault formula and mean creatinine clearance according to abbreviated modification of diet in renal disease equation (aMDRD) decreased after donation by 30% (P < .05). No cases of proteinuria were observed. Hypertension occurred in 1 donor (2.7%). CONCLUSION: Living kidney donation resulted in a reduced creatinine clearance in the donor. Follow-up of living kidney donors is essential to determine risk factors for deterioration of residual kidney function.

Significance of urodynamic assessment of lower urinary tract in dialysis patients before renal transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Some dialyzed patients suffer from lower urinary tract (LUT) anatomic and functional disturbances. Complete LUT assessment should be performed to decide whether they can be included on the waiting list, because such disorders, if not diagnosed and properly treated before transplant, may lead to graft loss. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Based on data in the medical records of 4170 dialysis patients, 535 were selected for further investigation: 265 patients after undergoing urethrocystography or urethrocystoscopy, were included on the waiting list for transplantation and 145 patients underwent nephroureterectomy owing to reflux, nephrolithiasis, polycystic renal disease, or hydronephrosis. Five patients with urethral or bladder neck stricture underwent urethral dilation or bladder neck incision. These patients were also ultimately listed for transplantation. Twenty-two patients, with serious LUT disease were qualified for kidney transplantation after extra-anatomic urine outflow. Ninety-eight patients underwent a urodynamic study (URD) to assess LUT disturbances. RESULTS: Of 535 studied patients, 460 (86%), including those who underwent surgical or pharmacologic treatment, were ultimately listed for kidney transplantation. Out of 98 patients who underwent a URD, 45 (46%) were included for kidney transplantation, and 47 for transplantation with atypical urinary outflow. Six patients were excluded from transplantation owing to refusal of investigations or serious contraindications. CONCLUSIONS: All potential kidney recipients should undergo proper evaluation of the LUT before being qualified for kidney transplantation. This study allows selection of patients who should undergo surgical and/or pharmacologic treatment before transplantation.