High Circulating Sphingosine 1-Phosphate is a Risk Factor for Osteoporotic Fracture Independent of Fracture Risk Assessment Tool.

Circulating sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) levels may be a biomarker for osteoporotic fracture (OF). This study assessed whether the addition of S1P levels to the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) could improve predictability of OF risk. Plasma S1P concentrations and FRAX variables were measured in 81 subjects with and 341 subjects without OF. S1P levels were higher in subjects with than those without OF (3.11 ± 0.13 µmol/L vs. 2.65 ± 0.61 µmol/L, P = 0.001). Higher S1P levels were associated with a higher likelihood of OF (odds ratio [OR] = 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05-1.68), even after adjusting for FRAX probabilities. Compared with the lowest S1P tertile, subjects in the middle (OR = 3.37, 95% CI = 1.58-7.22) and highest (OR = 3.65, 95% CI = 1.66-8.03) S1P tertiles had higher rates of OF after adjustment. The addition of S1P levels to FRAX probabilities improved the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) for OF, from 0.708 to 0.769 (P = 0.013), as well as enhancing category-free net reclassification improvement (NRI = 0.504, 95% CI = 0.271-0.737, P < 0.001) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI = 0.044, 95% CI = 0.022-0.065, P < 0.001). Adding S1P levels to FRAX probabilities especially in 222 subjects with osteopenia having a FRAX probability of 3.66-20.0% markedly improved the AUC for OF from 0.630 to 0.741 (P = 0.012), as well as significantly enhancing category-free NRI (0.571, 95% CI = 0.221-0.922, P = 0.001) and IDI (0.060, 95% CI = 0.023-0.097, P = 0.002). S1P is a consistent and significant risk factor of OF independent of FRAX, especially in subjects with osteopenia and low FRAX probability.

Validation of the MCNP6 code for SFR shielding design analysis.

In this paper, the uncertainty of the Monte Carlo code MCNP6 for the sodium-cooled fast reactor (SFR) shielding design is studied. Shielding analysis, which ensures the radiation safety of the core design, is challenging for the Monte Carlo modeling because it is associated with large uncertainties. In order to evaluate the performance of the MCNP6 relative to the shielding design of the SFR, four SFR shielding benchmarks from the Shielding Integral Benchmark Archive Database benchmark suite, i.e. JANUS Phase VIII, SDT12, EURAC_Na and HARMO_Na were selected and analysed. In this research, the weight window variance-reduction technique and the neutron data library ENDF/B-VII.1 were used in the modeling of the benchmark problems. The results and the validation of the MCNP6 models with the available measurement data are presented in this paper. These results contribute to the assessment of radiological protection and shielding design of the Korean Prototype Gen-IV Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor.

Comprehensive therapeutic outcomes of frontline imatinib mesylate in newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients in Korea: feasibility assessment of current ELN recommendation.

Optimal responses during imatinib therapy are commonly defined following the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations. Achievements of these optimal responses have not, however, been comprehensively tested as response-related prognostic factors using single center data sets. We evaluated the parameters using long-term (median 63 months) outcomes from 363 chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib as frontline therapy at our center. Intention-to-treat analysis showed comparable rates of complete cytogenetic response (86 %), major molecular response (MMR, 54 %), and complete molecular response (MR(4.5), 8 %). Estimated overall survival, progression-free survival, and event-free survival at 7 years were 94, 88 and 84 %, respectively. Achievement of recommended optimal response at 6 months (major cytogenetic response) and 12 months (complete cytogenetic response) yielded significantly better overall, progression-free, and event-free survival. However, achievement of recommended optimal response at 18 months (MMR) provided marginal benefit only in event-free survival. Most ELN criteria were predictive of long-term outcomes, with the exception of the clinical significance of achieving MMR at 18 months. Treatment adherence in the early treatment period was one of the important independent predictors of favorable long-term outcome. Durable cytogenetic and molecular responses were maintained in a majority of patients treated with optimal dose intensity.