Characteristics of Very Young Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Contemporary Assessment.

Background: This study aims to compare indications, patient characteristics, hospital factors, and complication rates between total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients aged 30 years or younger and those older than 30 years using a large national database. Methods: The Premier Healthcare Database was utilized to identify primary THA patients from 2015 to 2021 who were aged ≤30 or >30 years. Patient demographics, hospital factors, and primary indications were compared for each cohort. Rates of complications and readmissions were assessed for each cohort by primary indication. Differences were assessed through univariate analysis. Results: Overall, 539,173 primary THA patients were identified (age ≤30: 1849; >30: 537,234). Compared to the >30 cohort, the ≤30 cohort was more likely to be male (56.5% vs 44.9%, P < .001) and non-White (34.0% vs 14.2%, P < .001). The most common indications for THA in the ≤30 cohort were osteonecrosis (49.3%), osteoarthritis (17.8%), and congenital hip deformities (16.0%), and in the >30 cohort, they were osteoarthritis (77.0%), other arthritis (11.3%), and osteonecrosis (5.4%). Patients aged ≤30 years had lower rates of respiratory failure (0.16% vs 0.57%, P < .001), acute renal failure (0.32% vs 1.72%, P < .001), and urinary tract infection (0.38% vs 1.11%, P = .003) than those aged >30 years, but higher rates of wound dehiscence (0.59% vs 0.29%, P = .015) and transfusion (3.68% vs 2.21%, P < .001). There were no differences in 90-day readmission rates (P = .811) or 90-day in-hospital death (P = .173) between cohorts. Conclusions: Younger patients undergoing THA differed significantly in indication, patient characteristics, and hospital factors compared to the older population on univariate analysis. Despite differences in indications, the cohorts did not differ markedly with regard to complication rates in this study.

Medicaid Patients Undergo Total Joint Arthroplasty at Lower-Volume Hospitals by Lower-Volume Surgeons and Have Poorer Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Medicaid insurance coverage among patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) or those undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been associated with worse postoperative outcomes compared with patients without Medicaid. Surgeons and hospitals with lower annual total joint arthroplasty (TJA) volume have also been associated with worse outcomes. This study sought to characterize the associations between Medicaid insurance status, surgeon case volume, and hospital case volume and to assess the rates of postoperative complications compared with other payer types. METHODS: The Premier Healthcare Database was queried for all adult patients who underwent primary TJA from 2016 to 2019. Patients were divided on the basis of their insurance status: Medicaid compared with non-Medicaid. The distribution of annual hospital and surgeon case volume was assessed for each cohort. Multivariable analyses were performed accounting for patient demographic characteristics, comorbidities, surgeon volume, and hospital volume to assess the 90-day risk of postoperative complications by insurance status. RESULTS: Overall, 986,230 patients who underwent TJA were identified. Of these, 44,370 (4.5%) had Medicaid. Of the patients undergoing TJA, 46.4% of those with Medicaid were treated by surgeons performing ≤100 TJA cases annually compared with 34.3% of those without Medicaid. Furthermore, a higher percentage of patients with Medicaid underwent TJA at lower-volume hospitals performing ≤500 cases annually, 50.8% compared with 35.5% for patients without Medicaid. After accounting for differences among the 2 cohorts, patients with Medicaid remained at increased risk for postoperative deep vein thrombosis (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.16; p = 0.031), pulmonary embolism (adjusted OR, 1.39; p < 0.001), periprosthetic joint infection (adjusted OR, 1.35; p < 0.001), and 90-day readmission (adjusted OR, 1.25; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Medicaid were more likely to undergo TJA performed by lower-volume surgeons at lower-volume hospitals and had higher rates of postoperative complications compared with patients without Medicaid. Future research should assess socioeconomic status, insurance, and postoperative outcomes in this vulnerable patient population seeking arthroplasty care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Rise of Medicare Advantage: Effects on Total Joint Arthroplasty Patient Care and Research.

BACKGROUND: Medicare Advantage (MA) plans are popular among Medicare-eligible patients, but little is known about MA in lower-extremity total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The purpose of this study was to describe trends in MA utilization and analyze differences in patient characteristics and postoperative outcomes between patients undergoing primary TJA using traditional Medicare (TM) or MA plans. METHODS: Patients ≥65 years of age who underwent primary total knee or total hip arthroplasty were identified using the Premier Healthcare Database. Patients were categorized into TM and MA cohorts. Data from 2004 to 2020 were used to describe trends in insurance coverage. Data from 2015 to 2020 were used to identify differences in patient characteristics and postoperative complications using ICD-10 codes. Multivariate analyses were performed using 2015 to 2020 data to account for potential confounders. RESULTS: From 2004 to 2020, the proportion of patients with MA increased from 7.9% to 34.4%, while those with TM decreased from 83.7% to 54.0%. Of the 697,317 patients who underwent primary elective TJA from 2015 to 2020, 471,439 (67.6%) had TM coverage and 225,878 (32.4%) had MA coverage. The cohorts were similar in terms of age and sex. However, a higher proportion of Black patients (8.29% compared with 4.62%; p < 0.001) and a lower proportion of White patients (84.0% compared with 89.2%; p < 0.001) were enrolled in MA compared with TM. After controlling for confounders, patients with MA had higher odds of surgical site infection (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04 to 1.47; p = 0.031), periprosthetic joint infection (aOR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.18; p = 0.006), stroke (aOR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.31; p = 0.026), and acute kidney injury (aOR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.11; p < 0.001), but lower odds of urinary tract infection (aOR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.90 to 0.98; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: From 2004 to 2020, the number of patients utilizing MA increased markedly such that 1 in 3 were covered by MA in 2020. From 2015 to 2020, patients who were non-White were more likely to have MA than TM, and the MA group had a higher rate of several postoperative complications compared with the TM group. As TM claims data inform health-care policy and clinical decisions, this change portends future challenges, including limitations in arthroplasty registry research, an increase in the administrative burden of surgeons, and a potential worsening of social disparities in health care.

Discharge to Inpatient Rehab Does Not Result in Improved Functional Outcomes Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Monitored rehabilitation has long been considered an essential part of the recovery process in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the optimal setting for rehabilitation remains uncertain. We sought to determine whether inpatient rehabilitation settings result in improved functional and patient-reported outcomes after primary TKA. METHODS: All patients undergoing primary TKA from May 2007 to February 2011 were identified from our institutional total joint registry. Propensity score matching was then performed, resulting in a final cohort of 1213 matched pairs for discharge destination to either home or a rehabilitation facility (inpatient rehab or skilled nursing facility). Length of stay, need for manipulation, 6-month complications, and 2-year Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Lower Extremity Activity Scale, 12-item Short Form Health Survey, and Hospital for Special Surgery knee expectations surveys were compared. RESULTS: Patients discharged to a rehab facility were noted to have a shorter hospital length of stay (5.0 vs 5.4 days). Patients discharged to inpatient rehabilitation reported more fractures at 6 months postoperatively. However, no differences in manipulation rates, 2-year outcome scores, or changes in outcome scores were found between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Inpatient rehabilitation settings did not result in lower complications at 6 months or improved functional or patient-reported outcomes at 2 years compared to discharge directly to home when patients are propensity matched for age, living situation, comorbidities, baseline functional status, and insurance status. This finding has important cost implications and calls into question whether the healthcare system should allow otherwise healthy patients to use inpatient rehabilitation services postoperatively after primary TKA.

The increased total cost associated with post-operative drains in total hip and knee arthroplasty.

In a consecutive series of 536 unilateral primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and 598 unilateral primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), the use of a post-operative drain was associated with $538 additional cost per THA, and $455 for TKA. The use of a drain increased hospital length of stay (LOS) for THA, but not for TKA. In both groups, the use of a drain increased estimated blood loss (EBL) and increased the amount of allogeneic blood transfused. Over the 10-week period, drain use was associated with a total cost of $432,972 for our institution. Data from this study would favor a selective approach to the use of drains in primary joint arthroplasties.