RESUMO
Glaucoma is a condition affecting one or both eyes with raised intraocular pressure (IOP). IOP should be reduced to prevent progression of visual field loss. This study investigates the cost-effectiveness of bimatoprost compared with latanoprost as first-line monotherapies in the treatment of glaucoma in Austria, Finland and France. On the basis of a single multicentre, randomised, investigator-masked controlled trial, a 6- and 12-month cost-effectiveness model was designed following the treatment recommendations from the European Glaucoma Society. Treatment changes due to insufficient IOP reduction and adverse events were included. The cost-effectiveness analysis showed that the need for adjunctive therapy was the major cost driver. On the basis of evidence from the randomised, investigator-masked clinical trial (RCT), the cost-effectiveness analysis found that bimatoprost was a cheaper and a more effective treatment strategy compared with latanoprost. This was true for all three countries and all IOP targets between 13 and 20 mmHg. The cost-effectiveness result may be generalised to a European setting and perspective.