Photographic Assessment of Intermittent Exotropia Using a Translucent Cover.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the validity of the photographic assessment with a translucent cover that is clinically available for the evaluation of intermittent exotropia. METHODS: Photographs of 270 patients who cooperated for the prism and alternate cover test (PACT) were reviewed. Full-face images were obtained with a digital camera while a translucent cover was placed in front of either eye. The change in distance from the medial canthus to the nasal limbus with occlusion was measured and the photographic angle was estimated by three independent ophthalmologists based on representative photographs. These two measurements were correlated with the angle measured using the PACT, and clinical features related to the discrepancy between the photographic angle and the angle measured with the PACT were determined. RESULTS: Patients with intermittent exotropia of 27.0 ± 6.1 prism diopters (PD) showed a 4.5 ± 3.3 mm exodrift and an estimated angle of 29.0 ± 4.3 PD on the photographs with occlusion. The exodrift distance and photographic angle were positively correlated with the angle of PACT (r = 0.256, P < .001 and r = 0.546, P < .001, respectively). Of the 47 patients with a discrepancy of greater than 8 PD, 38 patients (80.9%) were regarded as having a photographic angle that was larger than the angle of PACT, which was more common in older patients, in those with a small distance angle, and when taking off the spectacles. CONCLUSIONS: Photographs with a translucent cover can reveal the latent components of intermittent exotropia. However, the photographic angle might differ from the real angle, particularly in older patients with a small angle and with the spectacles off. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2021;58(5):331-338.].

Reducing the Costs of an Eye Care Adherence Program for Underserved Children Referred Through Inner-City Vision Screenings.

PURPOSE: We previously reported costs and outcomes of the Children's Eye Care Adherence Program (CECAP1), a social worker intervention designed to improve adherence to eye care for underserved children in urban Philadelphia. Using cost findings from CECAP1, we revised the intervention to reduce costs. The aim of this study was to evaluate costs and effectiveness of the revised intervention (CECAP2). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Records of children needing ophthalmic follow-up after 2 community-based vision screening programs were reviewed. We modified CECAP1 to prioritize children more likely to visit, decreased phone calls and scheduling attempts, better documented children already followed by other doctors, and constricted our geographic catchment area for better accessibility. Cost was calculated using time spent executing CECAP2 by our salaried social worker. Effectiveness was defined as the percentage of patients completing at least 1 follow-up visit within the recommended time frame. RESULTS: Of 462 children referred to CECAP2 from our in-school and on-campus screening programs, 242 (52.4%) completed subsequent recommended eye examinations, a proportion identical to our prior report (52.3%). Social worker time per patient was 0.8 hours; a significant reduction from the previous 2.6 hours (P < .01). Cost per patient was $32.73; a significant reduction compared to the previous $77.20 (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Programmatic changes to reduce social worker intervention time and target potential patients by likelihood to attend along with constriction of the catchment area led to reduced costs by more than 50%, without impairing CECAP effectiveness.