Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Epilepsy Res ; 177: 106748, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34521043

RESUMO

Seizure clusters (SCs) are episodes of consecutive seizures that occur within a short period. The treatment patterns of rescue medications (RMs), as well as the burden of SCs, have not been assessed. A systematic literature search on Embase.com (in PubMed and Embase), supplemented with keyword-based and bibliographic searches, identified 44 articles for disease burden, three treatment guidelines, and three articles for treatment patterns. Common SC definitions were ≥3 seizures/24 h, ≥2/24 h and ≥2/6 h. The rate of SCs in prospective studies ranged from 21.7 %-42.5 %. The frequency of status epilepticus (SE) was higher in SC patients. SCs were associated with higher seizure frequency, higher risk of treatment resistance, and lower likelihood of seizure remission. Quality of life (QoL) was lower in children with SCs than in those with isolated seizures. Seizure-related hospitalization was more common in SC than non-SC patients. SCs adversely affected the productivity of patients and their caregivers. In outpatients with SCs, RMs were prescribed to 24.6 %-89.6 % and utilized by 15.6 %-44.5 %, with rates being higher in children. Key reasons for RM under-utilization were lack of seizure action plans, poor physician-patient communication, and concerns with administration route. In conclusion, SCs are associated with a higher risk of SE, treatment resistance, and low rate of seizure remission. They adversely affect patient and caregiver QoL and work productivity. However, RMs are under-prescribed, and there is an urgent need to improve recognition of SCs, improve use of seizure action plans, and remove barriers to RM use.


Assuntos
Qualidade de Vida , Convulsões , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Criança , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Humanos , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Convulsões/tratamento farmacológico , Convulsões/terapia
2.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord ; 8(5): 831-839.e2, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32184080

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Diagnostic-quality portable color Doppler ultrasound (PCD) offers convenient point-of-care venous reflux disease (VRD) diagnosis. Philips Lumify (Philips N.V., Best, The Netherlands), a high-fidelity broadband linear array transducer (4-12 MHz frequency), connects through a web-enabled smartphone or tablet to cloud software and offers B-mode and color Doppler imaging without pulsed wave Doppler capability. The aims of the study were to compare hand-held acoustic Doppler (HHD) vs PCD diagnostic performance using conventional duplex ultrasound (DUP) as the "gold standard" for VRD assessment, to assess effects of body mass index (BMI) and disease severity on diagnostic performance of HHD and PCD, and to determine whether PCD offers any diagnostic improvement over HHD in VRD assessment. METHODS: There were 241 patients (65 male, 176 female; mean age, 55.5 ± 15.5 years; mean BMI, 32.2 ± 7.9 kg/m2). DUP (447 legs), PCD (262 legs), and HHD (217 legs) studied the great saphenous vein at above-knee (AK) and below-knee (BK) levels. A phlebologist performed HHD, whereas PCD and DUP were performed sequentially (PCD first) by an experienced technologist and interpreted independently. PCD was done blinded to DUP results. DUP findings were analyzed blinded to HHD and PCD results. Venous reflux was dichotomously assessed as <2 seconds and >2 seconds. RESULTS: HHD improves from moderate to good sensitivity from AK level (68%) to BK level (94%) but suffers poor specificity that declines significantly from AK level (50%) to BK level (12%; P < .05). HHD positive predictive value exceeds its negative predictive value (NPV) and remains unchanged from AK level (71%) to BK level (72%). HHD NPV remains consistently poor at AK (48%) and BK (42%) levels. PCD has similar sensitivity from AK level (69%) to BK level (74%), better AK level (79%) vs BK level (58%) specificity (P < .05), similar positive predictive value for AK (76%) and BK levels (78%), and better NPV for AK level (72%) vs BK level (53%; P < .05). BMI range (<30 kg/m2 vs ≥ 30 kg/m2) did not influence diagnostic performance of HHD and PCD significantly. HHD and PCD specificity was higher for Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology (CEAP) class <4 compared with CEAP class ≥4 (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The relative diagnostic performance of HHD and PCD is highly dependent on insonation level. PCD advantages compared with HHD are marginally greater specificity at AK and BK levels and better NPV at AK level. Compared with HHD, PCD's disadvantage is lower sensitivity at BK level. Both HHD and PCD have higher specificity at AK level than at BK level. Overall, PCD offers only moderate sensitivity and specificity, making it inadequate for exclusion of significant venous reflux. Neither obesity nor CEAP class significantly influenced the general diagnostic performance of PCD or HHD.


Assuntos
Testes Imediatos , Veia Safena/diagnóstico por imagem , Transdutores , Ultrassonografia Doppler em Cores/instrumentação , Ultrassonografia Doppler/instrumentação , Insuficiência Venosa/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Fluxo Sanguíneo Regional , Sistema de Registros , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Veia Safena/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência Venosa/fisiopatologia , Adulto Jovem
3.
Neurology ; 66(11): 1730-1, 2006 Jun 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16769949

RESUMO

Using data from video-EEG monitoring, the authors studied whether ictal eye closure was a reliable indicator of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES). Among the 52 patients with PNES, 50 consistently closed their eyes, while 152 of the 156 patients with epileptic seizures (ES) opened their eyes during seizures. These findings suggest that ictal eye closure is a highly reliable indicator for PNES, while ictal eye opening is an indicator of ES.


Assuntos
Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Transtornos da Motilidade Ocular/diagnóstico , Exame Físico/métodos , Transtornos Psicofisiológicos/diagnóstico , Convulsões/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos da Motilidade Ocular/etiologia , Transtornos Psicofisiológicos/complicações , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Convulsões/complicações , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA