The impact of hepatic and splenic volumetric assessment in imaging for chronic liver disease: a narrative review.

Chronic liver disease is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can fully visualise the liver and adjacent structures in the upper abdomen providing a reproducible assessment of the liver and biliary system and can detect features of portal hypertension. Subjective interpretation of CT and MRI in the assessment of liver parenchyma for early and advanced stages of fibrosis (pre-cirrhosis), as well as severity of portal hypertension, is limited. Quantitative and reproducible measurements of hepatic and splenic volumes have been shown to correlate with fibrosis staging, clinical outcomes, and mortality. In this review, we will explore the role of volumetric measurements in relation to diagnosis, assessment of severity and prediction of outcomes in chronic liver disease patients. We conclude that volumetric analysis of the liver and spleen can provide important information in such patients, has the potential to stratify patients' stage of hepatic fibrosis and disease severity, and can provide critical prognostic information. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This review highlights the role of volumetric measurements of the liver and spleen using CT and MRI in relation to diagnosis, assessment of severity, and prediction of outcomes in chronic liver disease patients. KEY POINTS: Volumetry of the liver and spleen using CT and MRI correlates with hepatic fibrosis stages and cirrhosis. Volumetric measurements correlate with chronic liver disease outcomes. Fully automated methods for volumetry are required for implementation into routine clinical practice.

Comparison of Long-Term Healthcare Cost and Utilisation of Nonoperative and Surgical Management of Thumb CMC Arthritis.

Background: Thumb carpometacarpal joint (CMC) osteoarthritis is the most symptomatic hand arthritis but the long-term healthcare burden for managing this condition is unknown. We sought to compare total healthcare cost and utilisation for operative and nonoperative treatments of thumb CMC arthritis. Methods: We conducted a retrospective longitudinal analysis using a large nationwide insurance claims database. A total of 18,705 patients underwent CMC arthroplasty (trapeziectomy with or without ligament reconstruction tendon interposition) or steroid injections between 1 October 2015 and 31 December 2018. Primary outcomes, healthcare utilisation and costs were measured from 1 year pre-intervention to 3 years post-intervention. Generalised linear mixed effect models adjusted for potentially confounding factors such as the Elixhauser comorbidity score with propensity score matching were applied to evaluate the association between the primary outcomes and treatment type. Results: A total of 13,646 patients underwent treatment through steroid injections, and 5,059 patients underwent CMC arthroplasty. At 1 year preoperatively, the surgery group required $635 more healthcare costs (95% CI [594.28, 675.27]; p < 0.001) and consumed 42% more healthcare utilisation (95% CI [1.38, 1.46]; p < 0.0001) than the steroid injection group. At 3 years postoperatively, the surgery group required $846 less healthcare costs (95% CI [-883.07, -808.51], p < 0.0001) and had 51% less utilisation (95% CI [0.49, 0.53]; p < 0.0001) annually. Cumulatively over 3 years, the surgical group on average was $4,204 costlier than its counterpart secondary to surgical costs. Conclusions: CMC arthritis treatment incurs high healthcare cost and utilisation independent of other medical comorbidities. At 3 years postoperatively, the annual healthcare cost and utilisation for surgical patients were less than those for patients who underwent conservative management, but this difference was insufficient to offset the initial surgical cost. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

A Geospatial Analysis of Hand Trauma Care: A Statewide Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic hand injuries often present with high acuity, but little is known about the influence of geospatial and socioeconomic factors on the timely delivery of care. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used the Michigan Trauma Quality Improvement Program database, a state-wide registry with 35 level I or II trauma centers. Adult patients sustained hand trauma requiring urgent operative treatment between 2016 and 2021. Zip codes of injury location were linked with the corresponding percentile score on the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a comprehensive measure of neighborhood disadvantage. Multiple regression analyses were used to determine associations of patient, injury and geospatial characteristics with the odds of sustaining acute hand trauma and time to operative treatment. RESULTS: Among 1,826 patients, the odds of sustaining acute hand trauma based on the ADI followed a bimodal distribution. Female sex, smoking, obesity, work-related injury and residence in a minor city were associated with increased odds, while younger age, comorbidities, and rural residence were associated with decreased odds. For 388 patients who underwent surgery within 48 hours, time to treatment was significantly increased in the highest ADI quintile, for patients who underwent fracture fixation, and for those with severe global injury severity. Multi-system injuries, moderate global injury severity and direct admission to an orthopaedic service were associated with shorter times to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in areas with greater neighborhood disadvantage may experience delayed operative care after acute hand trauma. This study highlights the importance of considering underserved populations and geospatial factors when determining the allocation of hand surgery resources. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III.

REPORTED PRICES FOR HIGH VOLUME HAND SURGERY IN THE ERA OF PRICE TRANSPARENCY: IMPLICATIONS FOR FUTURE POLICY ITERATIONS.

BACKGROUND: In 2021, the United States enacted a law requiring hospitals to report prices for healthcare services. Across several healthcare services, poor compliance and wide variation in pricing was found. This study aims to investigate variation in reporting and listed prices by hospital features for high-volume hand surgeries including Carpal Tunnel release, Trigger Finger Release, De Quervain Tenosynovitis Release, and Carpometacarpal Arthroplasty. METHODS: The Turquoise Health price transparency database was used to obtain listed prices and linked to hospital characteristics from the 2021 Annual American Hospital Association Survey. This study used descriptive statistics and generalized linear regression. RESULTS: The analytic cohort included 2,652 hospitals from across the US. The highest rate of price reporting was in the Midwest (52%, n=836) and lowest in the South (39%, n=925). Compared to commercial insurers, ($3,609, 95% CI: $3,414 to $3,805) public insurance rates were significantly lower (Medicare: $1,588, 95% CI: $1,484 to $1,693, adjusted difference = -$2,021, p<0.001, Medicaid: $1,403, (95% CI: $1,194 to $1,612, adjusted difference = -$2,206, p<0.001). Listed rates for self-pay patients were not statistically different from commercial rates. CONCLUSIONS: Although pricing for high volume elective hand surgeries is frequently reported, a high proportion of hospitals do not report prices. These data highlight the need for future transparency policy to include pricing for high-volume hand surgery to give patients the ability to make financially informed choices. These results are a valuable aid for surgeons and patients to promote financially conscious decisions.

Evaluating treatment response following locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A review of the available serological and radiological tools for assessment.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive primary malignancy of the liver and is the third most common cause of cancer-related global mortality. There has been a steady increase in treatment options for HCC in recent years, including innovations in both curative and non-curative therapies. These advances have brought new challenges and necessary improvements in strategies of disease monitoring, to allow early detection of HCC recurrence. Current serological and radiological strategies for post-treatment monitoring and prognostication and their limitations will be discussed and evaluated in this review.

Cardiac Risk Stratification in Liver Transplantation: Results of a Tiered Assessment Protocol Based on Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) confers increased perioperative risk in patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT). Although routine screening for CAD is recommended, there are limited data on the effectiveness of screening strategies. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of a 3-tiered cardiac risk-assessment protocol that stratifies patients based on age and traditional cardiac risk factors. We peformed a single-center, prospective, observational study of consecutive adult patients undergoing LT assessment (2010-2017). Patients were stratified into low-risk (LR), intermediate-risk (IR), or high-risk (HR) cardiac groups and received standardized investigations with selective use of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE), computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA), and coronary angiography (CA). Primary outcomes were cardiac events (CEs) and cardiovascular death up to 30 days after LT. Overall, 569 patients were included, with 76 patients identified as LR, 256 as IR, and 237 as HR. Cardiac risk factors included diabetes mellitus (26.0%), smoking history (47.3%), hypertension (17.8%), hypercholesterolemia (7.2%), family (17.0%) or prior history of heart disease (6.0%), and obesity (27.6%). Of the patients, 42.0% had ≥2 risk factors. Overall compliance with the protocol was 90.3%. Abnormal findings on TTE, DSE, and CTCA were documented in 3, 23, and 44 patients, respectively, and 12 patients were not listed for transplantation following cardiac assessment (1 LR, 2 IR, and 9 HR). Moderate or severe CAD was identified in 25.4% of HR patients on CTCA following a normal DSE. CEs were recorded in 7 patients (1.2%), with 2 cardiovascular deaths (0.4%). Cardiac risk stratification based on traditional cardiac risk factors with the selective use of DSE, CTCA, and CA is a safe and feasible approach that results in a low perioperative cardiac event rate.

Quality Measures in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Identifying Metrics to Improve Care.

BACKGROUND: Specific measures tailored to the properties of individual procedures will ensure the appropriate evaluation of quality. Because postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) is becoming increasingly common, a review of the literature is timely to identify potential breast reconstruction-specific measures that can be applied by institutions and national healthcare organizations to improve quality. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase for studies examining the quality of care for patients undergoing PMBR. Data extracted from the articles include basic study characteristics, the number of quality metrics, type of quality metric (defined by Donabedian model), and the domain of quality (defined by the National Academy of Medicine). RESULTS: A total of 2,158 articles were identified in the initial search, and 440 studies were included for data extraction. The most common type of quality measure was outcome measures (91%), and the least common measure was structure measures (1%). The most common metrics were operative time (41%), hospital type (28%), and aspects of the patient-provider interactions (20%). Additionally, we found that timeliness and equity were least common among the 6 National Academy of Medicine domains. CONCLUSIONS: We identified metrics utilized in the PMBR, some of which can be further investigated through high-level evidence studies and incorporated into policy. Because many factors influence surgical outcomes and breast reconstruction is driven by patient preferences, an inclusion of structure, process, and outcome metrics will help improve care for this patient population. Moreover, nonpunitive initiatives, specifically quality collaboratives, may provide an avenue to improve care quality without compromising patient safety.

Critical Assessment of Surveys in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Surveys are a fundamental research tool used in the field of plastic surgery. Although inherent biases within surveys have been recognized, the extent to which this problem exists in the plastic surgery literature remains unknown. The authors aim to (1) determine the extent to which common survey biases occur in plastic surgery surveys and (2) identify areas of improvement for survey researchers. METHODS: The authors conducted a systematic review of surveys in the plastic surgery literature from 1997 to 2017. After applying their inclusion and exclusion criteria, two reviewers examined a total of 199 studies containing a survey. A modified checklist based on the published literature was used to determine the presence, type, and severity of biases in plastic surgery surveys. RESULTS: The mean percentage of biased questions in each survey was 24 percent. The most common biases were moderate- (12 percent) and low-impact biases (10 percent). Specifically, the most common biases were forced choice questions (6 percent), horizontal responses (6 percent), and double-barreled questions (1 percent). Only 13 percent of the articles that fit the authors' inclusion criteria contained a full-length survey. CONCLUSIONS: Although surveys in plastic surgery do not contain high-impact biases, the authors have identified areas of improvement for surveys used in this specialty. The authors found that the surveys contain biases in question structure and the survey design, which can be improved through minor revisions to the question stem or responses. Moreover, journals should require researchers to submit a full-text survey for research transparency.