RESUMO
We investigated the prevalence of retinal vascular occlusion and intraocular bleeding and compare their risks in patients undergoing anticoagulant therapy, either with non-vitamin K-antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) or warfarin. We performed a cohort study (January 2015 to April 2018) in 281,970 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) using health claims in the nationwide database of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment service of Korea. A Cox-proportional hazard regression was used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) for retinal vascular occlusion or intraocular bleeding. The HR of retinal vascular occlusion was estimated to 1.59 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-1.86) for NOAC users compared to that with warfarin users. Among the various types of NOACs, all NOACs showed higher risk of retinal vascular occlusion than did warfarin. For intraocular bleeding, the HR was estimated to be 0.86 (95% CI, 0.75-0.98) for NOAC users compared with that with warfarin users. The risk of retinal vascular occlusion was higher in NOAC users than in warfarin users, while the risk of intraocular bleeding was lower with NOAC therapy. NOACs were not found to be as effective as warfarin for retinal vascular occlusion, but safe in terms of intraocular bleeding.
Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Hemorragia Ocular/epidemiologia , Oclusão da Veia Retiniana/epidemiologia , Varfarina/efeitos adversos , Administração Oral , Idoso , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Hemorragia Ocular/induzido quimicamente , Feminino , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Masculino , Prevalência , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , Oclusão da Veia Retiniana/induzido quimicamente , Varfarina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate subfoveal choroidal thickness and subanalyze Haller and Sattler layers in eyes with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC), uninvolved fellow eyes, and eyes of healthy controls using enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography. METHODS: Ocular findings and clinical features of 31 eyes with CSC, 24 fellow eyes and eyes of 30 healthy controls were analyzed retrospectively from October, 2014 to March, 2015. Subfoveal choroidal thickness was measured using enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography, and the thicknesses of Haller and Sattler layers were analyzed. RESULTS: Mean subfoveal choroidal thickness and mean thickness of Haller layer were significantly greater in CSC than in fellow eyes (P = 0.043 and P = 0.036, respectively) and in normal control eyes (P < 0.001 each), and those of fellow eyes in CSC patients were significantly thicker than those in normal control eyes (P = 0.018 and P = 0.017, respectively). The thickness of Sattler layer did not differ significantly among these groups (P = 0.519). CONCLUSION: Subfoveal choroidal thickness and the thickness of Haller layer were increased not only in affected but also in uninvolved fellow eyes of CSC patients. Nonvascular smooth muscle cells of the choroid may play a role in the pathophysiology of CSC, in response to increased sympathetic tone.